Hey there
This is very general advice, but it's helped me immensely! In an 'issue spotter' question, try following the IRAC method.
I = spot the ISSUE.
Write a heading stating what the issue is. For example, if you're doing Torts and it involves a battery claim, write "Battery" as a heading so the examiner knows exactly what you'll be talking about. For each issue write a new heading - again so the examiner can follow your answer.
R = state the RULE.
Here you identify the relevant cases you've studied which provide the rule/answer to the fact scenario provided. Simply write out the rule of the case, and then reference the case after the statement. For example "the tort of battery requires a positive, voluntary act, as a defendant is liable for their actions but not their inaction - Ines v Wylie 1844".
Also, if the fact scenario isn't exactly the same as the case you've just referenced, look for other cases which cover the additional facts of the scenario provided, as other cases may provide exceptions to the general rule.
A = APPLICATION of the rule to the fact scenario.
Simply apply the rules you've mentioned to the fact scenario provided.
C = Conclusion.
A short conclusion based on the rules and application of those rules to the fact scenario. For example, "If Mr. X were to take action for
he would most likely be successful/unsuccessful".
Hope that helps!