From your source
'Nevertheless, given the consistent effect of vitamin C on the duration and severity of colds in the regular supplementation studies, and the low cost and safety, it may be worthwhile for common cold patients to test on an individual basis whether therapeutic vitamin C is beneficial for them. Further therapeutic RCTs are warranted.'
Good enough for me, all of you are too busy trying to debate with me than actually answerinf the OPs question. Please provide something more effective than vitamin c or don't say anything at all lol. Water isn't better than vitamin c that's for sure.
Now because on here is very misinformed about pulp and it's nuriotinal values I'm happy to link them to an article which should clear up confusion
http://thewaterygourmet.blogspot.com.au/2010/02/is-orange-juice-with-pulp-better-for.html?m=1
Well that should just about cover everything good luck OP and all users reading this these and I hope you remain healthy and cold free. I'm going to go for a nice refreshing glass of OJ myself and hopefully ward of another cold for another year while simultaneously quenching my thirst.
Yeah, but you spoke about therapeutic vitamin C, which that source said this about: Regular supplementation trials have shown that vitamin C reduces the duration of colds, but this was not replicated in the few therapeutic trials that have been carried out.
I've already said that regular supplementation reduces the duration of colds, soooo?
But this is good, in one corner you've got a group of reasonable people with the biggest meta-analysis of its kind behind them, in the other you've got an incorrigible upstart with a chiropractic journal from 1999 and a fucking blog to make their case.
Not even going to bother with the pulp argument. You're just determined to argue whatever it is. Honestly at this point I could say the earth is round and you'd find a way to say it's flat.