Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 29, 2024, 11:38:27 pm

Author Topic: Relativistic velocity question help  (Read 2925 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

006896

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Relativistic velocity question help
« on: July 01, 2021, 09:07:07 pm »
0
Hi!
Could someone please help with how to answer this question? I'm thoroughly confused. I'm sure we need to apply the Lorentz factor to the time and distance and then use v=s/t, but I'm sure how to do this.
Thank you!

fun_jirachi

  • MOTM: AUG 18
  • HSC Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1068
  • All doom and Gloom.
  • Respect: +710
Re: Relativistic velocity question help
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2021, 02:50:18 pm »
+2
If you're stuck, this is a good read. For small velocities we would assume it is 0.7c + 0.7c = 1.4c; but we know this is impossible as nothing can exceed the speed of light. However, as we approach the speed of light we have to take into account relative time dilation and length contraction, which makes velocity addition for small velocities obsolete.
Spoiler
HSC 2018: Mod Hist [88] | 2U Maths [98]
HSC 2019: Physics [92] | Chemistry [93] | English Adv [87] | 3U Maths [98] | 4U Maths [97]
ATAR: 99.05

UCAT: 3310 - VR [740] | DM [890] | QR [880] | AR [800]
Guide Links:
Subject Acceleration (2018)
UCAT Question Compilation/FAQ (2020)
Asking good questions

006896

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Relativistic velocity question help
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2021, 06:00:49 pm »
0
If you're stuck, this is a good read. For small velocities we would assume it is 0.7c + 0.7c = 1.4c; but we know this is impossible as nothing can exceed the speed of light. However, as we approach the speed of light we have to take into account relative time dilation and length contraction, which makes velocity addition for small velocities obsolete.
Thanks! Is there a way to do this question without using that formula? Surely we should be able to apply a Lorentz transformation maybe twice somewhere, to get the answer?
I'm not too sure how to do it myself, but any solutions would be helpful!