Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 29, 2024, 01:39:57 am

Author Topic: Electrostatics - direction of integration  (Read 4957 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Electrostatics - direction of integration
« on: July 04, 2010, 06:46:05 am »
0
If you have a line of charge with charge density and you want to find the electric field at a perpendicular distance z from the midpoint, you get



Then you integrate from one end of the line of charge to the other. (e.g. )

Obviously if you reverse the integral terminals you get the negative of your original answer, but physically, why should reversing integral terminals even matter?

After all, the physical interpretation of the integral is just summing up the little s over the line, what does it matter which direction you do it in? And importantly, how do you know which is the correct direction to sum up the s?

mark_alec

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
  • Respect: +30
Re: Electrostatics - direction of integration
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2010, 12:41:19 pm »
0
For an (infinite) line of charge, you should get the result (using a cylindrical gaussian surface) that

I'm not sure what you are trying to integrate along, if you do it along an equidistant path from the line charge then the integral should be zero (as the potential is constant).

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Electrostatics - direction of integration
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2010, 11:00:07 pm »
0
To know why, you have to be careful with your definition of an integral from a BIGGER to SMALLER terminal. Take a look at this sum. so the dq's are those differences, you need these to be positive, in other words and so you are going forwards.

In either case, you integrate towards the way which the axis is pointing.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

Cthulhu

  • Guest
Re: Electrostatics - direction of integration
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2010, 12:15:32 am »
0
Just because I cbf making a new electrodynamics thread:

can somone check this answer for me?

Quote
Find the electric field inside a sphere which carries a charge density proportional to the distance from the origin,
, for some constant .
So...... We can use


The charge inside the sphere is

Where is just an integrating variable.


And the electric field is the same in all points on the sphere so we can say

and so


or



amirite?

edit: fixed the last line.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2010, 01:26:07 am by Cthulhu »

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Electrostatics - direction of integration
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2010, 03:46:38 am »
0
When integrating over a sphere I think

(Funny, I did a very similar problem for homework except that and we had to find the enclosed charge.)
« Last Edit: August 12, 2010, 03:49:56 am by /0 »

Cthulhu

  • Guest
Re: Electrostatics - direction of integration
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2010, 11:02:15 am »
0
When integrating over a sphere I think

(Funny, I did a very similar problem for homework except that and we had to find the enclosed charge.)

haha. Funny how i forgot I'd already answered the question and was just typing it out again from memory.

I guess it should be