According to what Professor Dickson (the guy that is in charge of actuarial studies at UoM), when I asked him about the Master of Actuarial Science, he said that that course only gives you exemption from Part 1 of the exam.
So if what he said is correct, you're better off doing a B.Com (Honours) in actuarial studies because then you've got exemption for Parts 1 & 2.
But I only asked him in person so my credibility is low. Remember, this is uni. Only the written mode can be used as official evidence.
I disagree, getting an extra year ok work experience is wayyy more attractive to an employer than part two, they don;t have many ppl to choose from anyway.... (this is not just my opinion i've been told this by several graduates)
That's what I don't get though.
Sure work experience is great but would employers want to invest a person with a postgrad degree in actuarial studies? Firstly, with a Master in Actuarial Science, if it's true that it doesn't give you exemption to part 2, then that means you'll need to part 2 and 3. But with a B.Com (Hons), you've already got exemption to part 1 and 2, you've only got the final run to go before you become "fully qualified" if you get what I mean.
But in your defence, you could argue that with an undegrad degree, you've already got what it takes to get into the workforce tog et work experience, that is depending on what that undergrad degree was.