Prompt: Should children as young as 14 years old be allowed to hold jobs?
Children of this generation are irresponsible and disruptive. Yet, the government allows children as young as fourteen years of age, to work. This is a rash, absurd decision to be made, hence why it should be overruled.
Children, at the age of fourteen, are still students attending school. Due to their jobs, come children tend to skip classes. Therefore, they also tend to fall behind in classes, resulting in them achieving low grades. Evidently, fourteen-year-old children must not have jobs as it is clear that it has a major effect upon their education.
Teenagers are not experienced enough to work. They have not undertaken any work experience. This could possibly leave shops or businesses unable to serve their consumers wither their products. Having unexperienced workers can also lead to damaging of equipment or potentially even a financial loss. Therefore, as children at the age of fourteen are inexperienced, it would not be suitable for them to be in a working environment.
It is evident that children as young as fourteen years of age, are not ready to work. Their inexperience contribute immensely to the idea that they should not work. Therefore, they are not suitable workers.