ATAR Notes: Forum
General Discussion => Sport => General Discussion Boards => Australian Football (AFL) => Topic started by: taiga on September 25, 2010, 05:31:05 pm
-
There goes ANOTHER 4 hours of no exams next week
-
lawl i posted in th other...
<Repeat>
EPIC DRAW
EPIC
ii'm SPEECHLESS.
-
same hahaha but if they repeat a game as good as this then ill be happy to spend those hours watching again ^_^
-
THIS THREAD IS FOR DICUSSING THE GRAND FINAL ONLY.
HOW SAINTS MANAGED THE DRAW:
#1 Lenny Hayes from 50m out.
#2 Goddard's leap with 6m left in the fwd 50
#3 Travis Cloke's left foot
Who else thought Goddard should've won Norm Smith?
-
Their faces were priceless.
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTfhIIEgoREMNs9rGFG77MC3CwjD_ioOoN90oPgpuRIOpOFgbs&t=1&usg=__co0eowi8TASiDIohEm5MCfPt-Os=)
EVERYONE. Even the crowd. Bahahahahaha.
Who else thought Goddard should've won Norm Smith?
The commentators kept going on about him as well...
-
Hayes:
18 kicks
14 handballs
5 marks
3 hit outs
12 tackles <<<================
1 goal
1 behind
Goddard:
18 kicks
13 handballs
5 marks
5 hitouts
5 tackles
2 goals
-
Yeh but Goddard's screamers were worth 2x marks. Seriously though, I hope they don't change the rule. It's hilarious for everyone (except for y'know, the players.)
-
Not hilarious for EVERYONE; its AWESOME for the betting companies...more money...on a side note; what happens to the money? do the bookies keep it all?
-
^^ Would imagine the bet is refunded if a 'Draw' is not offered to bet on.
-
Bookies keep it. Draw was paying 34:1 apparently, would have been good to put $10 on that.
I picked Hayes for norm smith though so :)
-
^^ Would imagine the bet is refunded if a 'Draw' is not offered to bet on.
Or they could be making TONS of money if a "Draw" is offered to bet on... Gambling sucks.
-
(http://images.slatterymedia.com/images/thumbs/800/2010/09/25/218669.jpg)
Just posting this up for no reason whatsoever...
And again...
(http://images.slatterymedia.com/images/thumbs/800/2010/09/25/218679.jpg)
-
In reality the odds of a draw are way worse than 34:1, but yeah, they would have made a KILLING.
-
Bookies keep it. Draw was paying 34:1 apparently, would have been good to put $10 on that.
You sure? My dad said he got like ~60% of his bet back apparently. I think the companies just want you to go back and bet again.
-
Bookies keep it. Draw was paying 34:1 apparently, would have been good to put $10 on that.
You sure? My dad said he got like ~60% of his bet back apparently. I think the companies just want you to go back and bet again.
Yeah, I thought on a draw you get half of the dividend because you like half won and half lost.
-
Bookies keep it. Draw was paying 34:1 apparently, would have been good to put $10 on that.
You sure? My dad said he got like ~60% of his bet back apparently. I think the companies just want you to go back and bet again.
Yeah, I think that's a goodwill gesture because of next week...during the season you wouldn't get cash back if there was a drawn game
-
gg harry taylor. He tipped the draw on before the game last night.
-
gg harry taylor. He tipped the draw on before the game last night.
yeh i know!!! so freaky lol