ATAR Notes: Forum

VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: Mr. Study on February 05, 2012, 05:41:21 pm

Title: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 05, 2012, 05:41:21 pm
Hey,

Thought I would start this topic, so I can tackle my problems with Methods!

Essential Math Methods

Question 1: f(x)=3x^2+x-2. Find {x:f(x)>0}
Could someone explain what this means: {x:f(x)>0} and then show me how to solve it?

Question 2: (http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/MM-Q1.png)
I can transpose other log equations to find x but this one has me stumped, as it's not the usual equation for me. (If that makes sense.  :-[)

Question 3: (http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/MM-q2.png)

Question 4: (http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/MM-q3.png)
Its suppose to be f circle g and not the word fog. I have never seen the circle symbol used before in math. xD

Question 5: (http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/MM-q4.png)

If someone explains Question 1 dont worry about Question 5.

Thanks!!
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Greatness on February 05, 2012, 05:52:35 pm
1) It means find the values of x for which the function is greater than 0. There are probably a few ways to do this, you can tell its a positive parabola so the values of x which are positive are the left side of the left x intercept and the right side of the right intercept - if that makes sense to you. lol
2) x= 10^2  because log b (a) = p so a=b^p
3) skip lol
4) i think it's a composite function... lol really cant remember
5) its asking for when the derivative is greater than 0
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 05, 2012, 05:59:02 pm
1. Ahh!! I get it! I was thinking of some other things and NOT of it being positive.
2. Ah, I was thinking of doing it like that but I wasn't too sure it was the correct way of showing working out.

3. xD

4. Out of curiousity, What is a composite function?
5. So would I do f'(x)=6(x-1).
    Then let f'(x) = 0
    So it looks like 0 < 6(x-1)
                           0  < x-1
                            1 < x
Am I on the right track?? I didn't do enough of these types of problems last year. :(

Just incase. No need for Questions 1 and 2 now. Yay!

Whoops. Thank you for the help swarley. :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Greatness on February 05, 2012, 06:18:49 pm
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_composition you'll learn it some stage of the year, i hated them.
5. looks good :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 05, 2012, 06:23:39 pm
5. It does??? Wow.

Thank you so much for your help swarley. :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Greatness on February 05, 2012, 06:32:42 pm
5. It does??? Wow.

Thank you so much for your help swarley. :)
Yeah i think so.... Altho i havent touched any math since exams... Hopefully most of what i've said is right :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 06, 2012, 07:09:10 pm
Heres my question:

I cant really draw the cubic graph on paint/microsoft but heres all the information.

Maximum turning point: (-1,6)
Minimum T.P: (1,4)
Y-Intercept: (0,-1)

Find {x:f'(x)>0}. We are also not given the cubics equation. :(

I checked the answers but it is {x:x<-1} u {x:x>1}. I am not too familiar with that way of writing so could someone also explain what it essentially means?

Thanks!  :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: pi on February 06, 2012, 07:40:22 pm
Removed last post, just realised my mistake (a big one!), will repost soon


edit: I give up, someone else find an equation to the cubic. For me, the y-int does not add up :( I think I've forgotten all of methods lol! Ignoring the y-int, the equation can be given by: ... I think. But that doesn't add up to the info, sorry Mr. Study :(
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Phy124 on February 06, 2012, 08:50:01 pm
Heres my question:

I cant really draw the cubic graph on paint/microsoft but heres all the information.

Maximum turning point: (-1,6)
Minimum T.P: (1,4)
Y-Intercept: (0,-1)

Find {x:f'(x)>0}. We are also not given the cubics equation. :(

I checked the answers but it is {x:x<-1} u {x:x>1}. I am not too familiar with that way of writing so could someone also explain what it essentially means?

Thanks!  :)
Given those turning points, I don't think the y-intercept can be -1? (I'm with you Rohit ;))

Let's pretend it says the y-intercept = (0,5)

We want to find when f'(x) >0 (When the graph is increasing)

Given the stationary points and our intercept, our graph will look like this https://www.desmos.com/calculator/kb0hymstlt (The equation Rohitpi worked out)

Therefore, it is increasing from (-oo,-1) then decreasing (-1,1) and increasing again from (1,oo)

We only want when it is increasing so

(-oo,-1) and (1,oo)

Which can also be written as

{x:x<-1} and {x:x>1}

If anyone else can find a logical solution that doesn't involve changing what is given then by all means call me out :P
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: b^3 on February 06, 2012, 09:13:47 pm
Agreed that the y-intercept is pretty screwed up. Also to add to Phy124's graph
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/nsivedqhna
f'(x)>0 when that tangent has a positive gradient, i.e. when it is not between those two green lines, try moving the slider for the value of a and having a look at what happens
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 06, 2012, 09:15:26 pm
Heres the image, I probably should've uploaded it but I couldn't find mine CD.
(http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/mmessentialmaths9bq7.png).

Thank you all for the help, I actually get it now!! :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: b^3 on February 06, 2012, 09:17:18 pm
Heres the image, I probably should've uploaded it but I couldn't find mine CD.
(http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/mmessentialmaths9bq7.png).

Thank you all for the help, I actually get it now!! :)
Makes sense then, (1,-4) not (1,4). But yeh in this case, you can see by the graph when the tangents will be positive, without having to find an equation.
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 06, 2012, 09:21:44 pm
Ah crap, Sorry about that!!!
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 17, 2012, 06:52:20 pm
Todays theme is Log questions. (Woo... :D).

(http://i1054.photobucket.com/albums/s481/BondJames5/logqs.png).

I'll try Latex next time. (Hopefully. :) ).

Thanks
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: pi on February 17, 2012, 07:00:20 pm
Probably made some stupid mistakes, but this is the way to go about them :)


1.





2.
Let


or
or
or

3.
Multiply both sides by


or
as
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 17, 2012, 07:06:10 pm
oO, You obliterated those questions easily... Thanks for the help Rohit
No one solve 3. I THINK I know what to do now. xD, NVM.
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: brightsky on February 17, 2012, 07:06:27 pm
e^x - 4e^(-x) = 0
e^x - 4/e^(x) = 0
e^(2x) - 4 = 0 (note that e^x cannot equal 0)
e^(2x) = 4
x = 1/2 * ln(4)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on February 18, 2012, 07:36:50 pm
Quartic's Question

1. . Is there any way to find the turning points WITHOUT a CAS calculator?
                                                                                                           _
2. Rewrite as hybrid. I get this far:
                                                                                                          |_.
I'm not too sure how to write the less/greater than for x.

Thanks. :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: monkeywantsabanana on February 18, 2012, 07:42:20 pm
Quartic's Question

1. . Is there any way to find the turning points WITHOUT a CAS calculator?
you derive it then equate it to 0, solve for x, sub it back into original equation to find the y.



Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Panicmode on February 18, 2012, 07:46:04 pm
Quartic's Question

1. . Is there any way to find the turning points WITHOUT a CAS calculator?
                                                                                                           _
2. Rewrite as hybrid. I get this far:
                                                                                                          |_.
I'm not too sure how to write the less/greater than for x.

Thanks. :)

2. Think about it in terms of where it "cuts" the negative region. Since is a positive quadratic, it will be positive for x < x-intercept 1 and x> x intercept 2. It will be negative between those values.





so it will be for and

and
for
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: b^3 on February 18, 2012, 07:50:58 pm
2. Rewrite as hybrid. I get this far:
                                                                                                          |_.
I'm not too sure how to write the less/greater than for x.

Thanks. :)
Now remember a mod makes whatever is inside it positive, so its is negative (y<0) then it will be made positive.

So when then you are just left with the positive of it, i.e. . When , it i s negative and being made positive hence we have .

So you have to work out when
Because it is not linear, we need to draw it out and visually work out when it is above 0. So intercepts are needed x(x-3)=0, x=0,3
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/bntqyrvf32

So it is above or equal to 0 when x<=0 and x=>3
So that is your domain for the
For it will be when its less then 0, so 0<x<3

Hope that helps :)

EDIT: Beaten.
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on March 07, 2012, 04:46:28 pm
. Gradient is 5 at (2,-2). Find a and b

This is what I have done:



Let


Let y=-2 and x=2 and sub into first equation.


I am not too sure what to do next. Also, If My working out is either wrong or I'm reasoning the wrong way, please say so. :)

Thank you.

EDIT: Just need my working out to be checked.

Find acute angle lying between and











I let m1=-3/4 and m2=2/3.


But I know we can't get tan^-1(negative number). So would someone be able to look through what I've done so far?

Thanks. :)
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: illuminati on March 07, 2012, 05:31:56 pm
. Gradient is 5 at (2,-2). Find a and b

This is what I have done:



Let


Let y=-2 and x=2 and sub into first equation.


I am not too sure what to do next. Also, If My working out is either wrong or I'm reasoning the wrong way, please say so. :)

Thank you.

EDIT: Just need my working out to be checked.

Okay so you have
dy/dx = 5
and then you go on to
5 = 2ax - bx^(-2)
you can sub in x = 2 here, because the gradient at x = 2 is 5
so you'll get
5 = 4a - b/4 ----> 20 = 16a - b
and then you have two simultaneous equations with a and b.
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: illuminati on March 07, 2012, 05:40:42 pm
Find acute angle lying between and











I let m1=-3/4 and m2=2/3.


But I know we can't get tan^-1(negative number). So would someone be able to look through what I've done so far?

Thanks. :)

You can tan inverse a negative.
You'll get ~-0.64 radians
Your angle is tan^-1(2/3) - tan^-1(-3/4), because if you recall, the angle between a line and the x axis is tan(theta) = m
So you can firstly find the angle your positive gradient line makes with the x axis, and then subtract the negative angle your negative gradient line makes
and you'll get the answer
Hope this helps :D
Title: Re: Mr. Study's 3 and 4 Questions
Post by: Mr. Study on March 07, 2012, 05:50:34 pm
Hey,

Thank you so much for that. :)

I had to change my calculator settings to do the tan inverse, otherwise it was a syntax error. :O