ATAR Notes: Forum

National Education => Admissions tests => GAMSAT => Topic started by: pi on March 24, 2012, 08:14:27 pm

Title: How was it?
Post by: pi on March 24, 2012, 08:14:27 pm
Did any AN-ers sit it today???


Hope you all did awesome! :D
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: paulsterio on March 24, 2012, 08:35:45 pm
I know that abes did!!

Maybe Russ, Stonecold...etc. might have sat it as well
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: pi on March 24, 2012, 08:45:09 pm
Pretty sure Russ sure is already MD...
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: paulsterio on March 24, 2012, 08:56:32 pm
Pretty sure Russ sure is already MD...

Really? D: Oh - I never knew that!
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: Peanuts11 on March 24, 2012, 09:00:46 pm
Just FYI, GAMSAT AUS in Washington concludes at 5AM AEST so please do not put the essay topics/questions until then.
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: Russ on March 24, 2012, 09:12:46 pm
I spent the day playing FIFA and most definitely not revising cardiology/sitting GAMSAT :( (or :) depending on how you look at it)
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: bridger on March 24, 2012, 10:47:54 pm
I thought Section 3 was quite hard. Was happy with the essays though and Section 1 wasn't too bad just that I had to rush the last 10 questions
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: jasrulz63 on March 25, 2012, 08:13:27 pm
Section 1 wasn't too bad, stock standard GAMSAT section 1 in my opinion, though there were a lot of long passages and only one cartoon. The material was a lot more medicine focused than normal too. Section 2 I felt was alright, the topics were quote good (nanny state, and love). Section 3 was the hardest one I've done, mainly because of time restraints. They didn't allow the use of calculators this year, then added in a lot of questions that involved you doing maths (dividing by decimals etc.), so it took some time. There wasn't as much organic chemistry as usual too.
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: stonecold on March 29, 2012, 12:23:21 am
Section 1 wasn't too bad, stock standard GAMSAT section 1 in my opinion, though there were a lot of long passages and only one cartoon. The material was a lot more medicine focused than normal too. Section 2 I felt was alright, the topics were quote good (nanny state, and love). Section 3 was the hardest one I've done, mainly because of time restraints. They didn't allow the use of calculators this year, then added in a lot of questions that involved you doing maths (dividing by decimals etc.), so it took some time. There wasn't as much organic chemistry as usual too.

This.  It was much harder than UK2011 IMO.  I failed it miserably.
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: Russ on March 29, 2012, 08:19:41 am
Didn't you also say that about UK2011?
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: golden on March 29, 2012, 08:34:34 am
Didn't you also say that about UK2011?

Didn't he also say that about his English Language score? Maybe his VCE?

Stonecold you should think that you can't get a Nobel Prize for something then you may end up with it =D.
Title: Re: How was it?
Post by: thushan on April 06, 2012, 09:16:37 am
No calculators and forced to divide by decimals? Harsh much...!