ATAR Notes: Forum
National Education => Tuition Companies and Services => Tuition and Education Services => VCE (and related) Businesses => Topic started by: Flaming_Arrow on April 27, 2009, 02:05:54 pm
-
Which are are the best for Physics and Accounting?
-
i heard access education is good for accounting. go to mythread in vce related businesses
-
For Physics, I know TSFX have some pretty good lectures especially when Greg takes them. But I was thinking of trying NEAP physics. Have you (or anyone) tried NEAP physics?
-
Whats the Uni Melb 1?...any idea?
where and when...
[email protected]
-
is access education for the best for accounting? what about NEAP or TSFX?
-
Whats the Uni Melb 1?...any idea?
where and when...
[email protected]
It's only for KLD scholars and UMEP people.
-
Which lectures are best for chemistry unit 3 revision?
-
Which lecturer in NEAP or TSFX does further electronics detailed study in Physics?
-
both...you just have to specify it
-
Soooooo.....botton line, what's best for Physics?
-
Do not go to Access Education, not really worth it. I tried TSFX for psychology and AE for PHysics. Physics was terrible.. i went to the one @ La trobe.. it was 90minute tram ride which ticked me off from MC. but i didnt know it was so far lol. anyways back on topic...
AE was terrible, they just went through the basic questions that people screw up on... i found the book they gave me potentially useless, my teacher hardly gives notes which makes him shat and AE wasn't any better. i shoulda just spent $35 for UNIT 3 Check Points books instead of AE.
TSFX is alot better but i did not attend the physics one. Thats just my opinion, i will attend the neap workshops in a few weeks time !
-
I disagree with the above. AE is good for the fundamentals, not for achieving 40+++++. It helps you with an overview, but if you want that extra bit of competitive edge, there's a reason why TSFX and NEAP charge twice as much.
-
Oh and Biology TSFX was also 7.5 hours long with 220+ pages of relevant notes,,
and my mate said NEAP was a mere 3 or 4 hours long with 80 pages
Yep, as I said in the other thread, NEAP's lectures are worse than TSFX's, but don't let the page numbers fool you. TSFX just has everything printed in massive font and massively spaced out so it spans a lot more pages. Personally this is a lot more time consuming to work through and it's really not concise at all. NEAP summarises all the necessary information within actually USEFUL data types such as tables and such instead of separating it out onto 6 pages with lists of info as TSFX does. TSFX definitely has more questions to work through though, but I think you should have a big enough stash of questions and practice exams anyway =\