ATAR Notes: Forum
Archived Discussion => Mathematics and Science => 2012 => End-of-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: Phy124 on November 07, 2012, 04:47:22 pm
-
Sorry about the delay, I see some solutions are up already. Too bad I had an exam this morning, not to worry :P
Here are some solutions I typed up for the first methods exam, hope you all did well, if not you've always got exam 2 to make up for it! :D
note: I've added a potential marking scheme that VCAA may use. However, this is not necessarily accurate.
1. a) Differentiate the function using the chain rule:
(1)
Possible methods:
where 
^3(2x-5))
where
(Same as above but u = g(x))
b) Differentiate using the quotient rule:
(1)
(1)
Using the quotient rule on the formulae sheet: )
2. ^3} \ dx)
(1)
(1)
Using ^n \ dx = \frac{(ax+b)^{n+1}}{a(n+1)}, n \neq -1)
3. For inverse swap x and y
(1)
(1)
(Note: You will probably be deducted one mark for not stating "for inverse swap x and y" or similar)
4. a) The mean is given by the sum of the product of
and the )
(1)
(1)
b) The probability that Daniel receives only one call on each of the days is  \times \Pr(x=1) \times \Pr(x=1))
(1)
c) Note: This question is quite ambiguous and I'm sure will cause some controversy. However, this is my interpretation of the question, due to it being worth 3 marks.
We want to find the combinations such that Daniel receives four calls over two days. We are told, however ambiguously, that Daniel has already received at least 1 phone call on each of the days.
The combinations possible are:
- 1 call on Monday, 3 calls on Wednesday
- 3 calls on Monday, 1 call on Wednesday
- 2 calls on Monday, 2 calls on Wednesday
The probability of the three combinations is the sum of the 3:
(1)
The probability that he receives one call on each days is:
(1)
Therefore the overall probability is:
(1)
5. a)
(http://content.screencast.com/users/phy124/folders/Jing/media/760f9290-3730-40be-8e5e-cae83ad9b704/2012-11-07_1525.png)
Correct graph shape (1)
Correct and labelled intercepts (1)
Correct and labeled endpoints (1)
b) i. Transformations as follows:
 \rightarrow (x,-y) \rightarrow (x + 5,-y))
Therefore the point
will become
(1)
ii. As shown before:
 \rightarrow (x + 5,-y))
 = (x+5),-y))




Sub into equation:
-3| + 2)


Alternatively:
(1)
(1)
6. a)  = a\sin(x))
}{\cos(x)} = a\frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)})
 = 1)
(1)
is a solution which occurs when  = \sqrt{3})

(1)
b)  = \sqrt{3})

is the other x-coordinate for intersection. (1)
7.
, 
Using logarithmic laws:
^2) - \log_e(x) = \log_e(2x+1))
^2}{x}\right) = \log_e(2x+1))
(1)
Taking the exponential of each side:
(1)
^2 = 2x^2 + x)


(x-4))

However 
(1)
8.a)  = q)
 = \Pr(100<X<106))
(1)
 = q - \frac{1}{2})
(1)
b)
(1)
(1)


(b+5))

However 
(1)
9. a) Use product rule given on formula sheet:
(or the other way around)
(1)
b) ) = \sin(x) + x\cos(x))
 = \frac{d}{dx}(x\sin(x)) - \sin(x))
 \dx = x\sin(x) - \int \sin(x) \ dx)
(1)
(1)
(1)
10. a) i.  = e^{-mx} + 3x)
Differentiate and solve to equal zero for stationary point:
(1)


Taking logarithm of each side:
 = \log_e\left(\frac{3}{m}\right))
)
)
^{-1})
(1)
ii. We want to find the values of
for which the value of
for which
is greather than zero i.e. >0)
We have 
And  \ \text{for all} \ m>3)
Therefore
(1)
b. The interpretation of this question is that the line of the tangent to the graph
at the point
will go through the point )
Firstly find the gradient of the tangent:
One point we know the tangent goes through is
, another can be found by substituting
into the original equation )
(1)
We can now use the equation:
(where m is the gradient)
 = (-me^{6m}+3)(x-(-6)))
We want it to go through the point (x,y) = (0,0) so
(1)

e^{6m} = 0)
has no solutions, so solve for 


(1)
-
For question 5a) would I lose marks if I didn't include the co-ordinates of the cusp?
Since technically it is not an axis intercept nor an end point..
-
i think you're working out the wrong antiderivative for question 2, the function is 1/(2x-1)^3 and also question 3 should have a cube root in it. other than that looks fine except Q4c which i still dont know who to believe so ill just wait until december 17th for that
-
Nice! :D
You know for q. 9b) it was worth three marks, where what would the third mark be awarded for?
-
i think you're working out the wrong antiderivative for question 2, the function is 1/(2x-1)^3 and also question 3 should have a cube root in it. other than that looks fine except Q4c which i still dont know who to believe so ill just wait until december 17th for that
LOL, I went to my old notes to get the formula to show and accidentally took the question from below the formula :P - Thanks
Nice! :D
You know for q. 9b) it was worth three marks, where what would the third mark be awarded for?
Thank you, the search function said I had 39 (1)'s and I couldn't work out where the other mark was supposed to go :P
I edited it. However, it's pretty hard to guess where they will and won't award marks. I'm sure if a few of the other past students had input the scheme could be a lot more accurate.
-
Thanks for fixing it! Ok I may have just lost one mark for that q. Cause I think i got step 2 right, but when I went to step 3, i misred the first pi as an x :o I wrote (1/2)x -pi/12 -sqrt(3)/2 and thought the thing they were looking for was somewthing with an x plus a constant which was my -pi/12 -sqrt(3)/2 ... :'(
-
Taking logarithm of each side:
 = \log_e(0))

(1)
log_e(0) is undefined, not 1 haha. log_e(1) = 0 :p
The problem is:
-e^6m + 18 = -6me^6m + 18
5e^6m = 0.
If you do this though it works:
-e^6m + 18 = -6me^6m + 18
(-e^6m)(1) = (-e^6m)(6m)
1 = 6m
m = 1/6
Might want to just give your answers that little tweak! The rest is great though, thanks :)
-
 = \log_e(0))

Might want to just give your answers that little tweak! The rest is great though, thanks :)
LOL oh wow... I worked out what the answer had to be on inspection and must've just forced myself to it :P I assume I read  = e^0)
It should have read
rather than
(or whatever I had) anyway.
-
I wonder if anyone did that on the exam
-
It wouldn't be all that surprising under exam conditions, but let's hope they didn't after doing all that previous working :P
-
Shouldn't question 1a be to the power of 3 instead of 2?
-
Yeah
-
Shouldn't question 1a be to the power of 3 instead of 2?
Yep, typo, thx.