16 is wrong, since mechanical energy is creating electrical energy ie generator. Then using Lenz Law current is Y -X so B
Actually, the loudspeaker is an application of the motor effect.
Actually, the loudspeaker is an application of the motor effect.
Correct me if wrong, but I though 16 was A because mechanical movement creating electrical energy (generator) and the right side of coil would be north to attract to south and reduce motion (Lenz's Law), and by right hand grip rule would be A?
I agree, there was no power supply, and the cone is pushed providing a current, therefore it is a generator. I disagree with the current direction though- we are looking at conventional current, so the thumb should point to the left, and the fields go from the north to south, therefore towards the center, therefore current should be going down on the front side, and travel from X to Y (conventional). So I would say A is the correct answer. (Hope it is anyway). I think the initial answer C is correct for the elevator- we experience weightlessness as the elevator slows, which implies a lower downwards acceleration, therefore it should not fall as fast.
Elevator is also incorrect
If the magnets were in the same direction, it would be stronger, but the magnets have their poles near each other- so the fields would be very small and only go from N to S in small contained areas- hence very minimal interaction with coil.
How is 10/(5.2x10^4) = 0.1 mT ?
Yeah it should be around 1.92*10^-4 T, they probably put 5*2 in calculator thinking the dot was a multiplication.
I agree, there was no power supply, and the cone is pushed providing a current, therefore it is a generator. I disagree with the current direction though- we are looking at conventional current, so the thumb should point to the left, and the fields go from the north to south, therefore towards the center, therefore current should be going down on the front side, and travel from X to Y (conventional). So I would say A is the correct answer. (Hope it is anyway). I think the initial answer C is correct for the elevator- we experience weightlessness as the elevator slows, which implies a lower downwards acceleration, therefore it should not fall as fast.
Fuck I'm from VCE - took a quick look at your exam and holy shit its wayyyy harder than VCE physics holy fuck
Just a q: q23b the field applied has to go upwards coz the electron is moving to the right - so current is going to the left (conventional current) , electric field going into page so the force is going downwards (using RH Slap)? So to make sure it doesnt go downwards the field has to go upwards?
(like im just learning here not questioning solutions or anything :P)
Would Q17 be A? As the elevator is slowing down as it reaches the TOP floor therefore time in flight would be shorter?
Time of flight is irrelevant here. The elevator is still moving up BUT slowing down, the ball is NOT slowing down along with the elevator. Because the ball isn't slowing down it'd actually move up relative to the elevator which is slowing down. Hence the dotted line above the solid line.
Imagine you are in an elevator, when you first take off from the ground, you experience a stronger downwards 'gravity'- just like a rocket ship taking off, this would cause the path shown in A. Just as you decelerate when you reach the top, imagine you are in the elevator, you get the fluttering feeling in the stomach, this is due to the feeling of lowered 'gravity', or a lower perceived weight. This lower weight means the flight will be longer. Pretty confident on this one. As for 15, I found this one hard... I think it should be A, I agree with the solutions, after lots of last minute research last night- light strikes the n or p type semiconductor around the boundary, creates the electron, hole pair (by exciting the electron out of the valence band), then the pn junction local electrical field pulls the electron towards the n type and the hole towards the p type. The light isn't changing the voltage, it is simply facilitating the electric field of the depletion zone achieving this.
Imagine you are in an elevator, when you first take off from the ground, you experience a stronger downwards 'gravity'- just like a rocket ship taking off, this would cause the path shown in A. Just as you decelerate when you reach the top, imagine you are in the elevator, you get the fluttering feeling in the stomach, this is due to the feeling of lowered 'gravity', or a lower perceived weight. This lower weight means the flight will be longer. Pretty confident on this one. As for 15, I found this one hard... I think it should be A, I agree with the solutions, after lots of last minute research last night- light strikes the n or p type semiconductor around the boundary, creates the electron, hole pair (by exciting the electron out of the valence band), then the pn junction local electrical field pulls the electron towards the n type and the hole towards the p type. The light isn't changing the voltage, it is simply facilitating the electric field of the depletion zone achieving this.But in doing so it creates a potential difference, so why not c). It just seems in a solar cell the potential difference is more important than the pairs. If both happen why is only A the answer.
Time of flight is irrelevant here. The elevator is still moving up BUT slowing down, the ball is NOT slowing down along with the elevator. Because the ball isn't slowing down it'd actually move up relative to the elevator which is slowing down. Hence the dotted line above the solid line.
Just wondering if u guys plan on answering any of the options topics? Thnx :)
But in doing so it creates a potential difference, so why not c). It just seems in a solar cell the potential difference is more important than the pairs. If both happen why is only A the answer.
hm my thoughts:
1. the multiple choice was hard. since im dumb i didnt know if voltage is stepped up or down for q1 but i guessed it right i think. Also the circular motion question freaked me out and I didn't know how to do it and did some weird calculations and still managed to get 5.9?? Also yep. fell for the speaker question and chose the wrong answer.
2. sigh. i shouldn't have looked at the answers. I told myself not to but then i did and I definitely regret it. The strangest thing was that I did the same working out for 30.a) as shown. but i didn't get that number..... I got a different value :/ so I must've done it wrong somehow....I probably would've been better off not knowing the answer (since I didn't even know if I did the question right but now I know i did it right but managed to get the wrong answer still) I didn't look at all the answers though, just some and then told myself to stop lol
3. I initially thought it was an alright exam. but the answers kind of gave me a reality check haha. I didn't see many mistakes out of the answers I glimpsed, but my mind tends to focus on what I did wrong rather than what I did right though :/
4. So for this exam I'm gonna go by my life motto of "expect the worst" ;D ;D
I agree, that is why I find this one hard (regarding Q15), but as for the most correct, is the light independently responsible for the creation of the voltage? No. It is the electric field that produces the voltage. What I mean to say, is some random bit of light could strike a p type semiconductor, and an electron - anti electron pair would form and then recombine- there would be no voltage. Hence it is not the light causing the voltage, but the electric field across the p n junction that already exists though. That is my take on it though... tough one.
Speaker question got me too; we can despair together ;) sounds like you did great on the whole in a hard section!
You'll get 2/3 just for the working, don't let it stress you! ;D
You will be fine; this was a tough exam and it sounds like you did really well on the whole. Don't stress, it's done now, just party! ;D
Quanta to Quarks Solutions (My Solutions?!):
I realised I mixed up weak and strong force in my paper haha, I fixed it hear though. I imagine a moderator can place these solutions in the official ones if they are happy with them.
Ai) Neutrons and protons. Protons are positive, neutrons negative.
c) Pauli = Pauli’s exclusion principle which used the three quantum numbers to provide an explanation of the unique states of electrons in their orbits (e.g. 2,8,18 etc.) Pauli explained the quantum arrangement of electrons in the hydrogen atom, making Bohr’s model more credible and justified.
Heisenberg = Matrix mechanics which supported Schrodinger’s probabilistic wave function- lead to the conceptualisation of the quantum probability cloud adaptation of the Bohr model. The Heisenberg Uncertainty principle implies an inaccuracy in measurement which lends further support to an uncertain interpretation of orbital positions and momentums.
Hahah woops- fixed above
e) Pretty standard question- you should mention his work in neutron bombardment experiments in which he discovered that slower thermal neutrons were more effective in producing fission. He worked in the Manhattan Project and created the first working nuclear reactor. This involved pioneering moderators like graphite and control rods made of cadmium or boron. This is reflected in modern nuclear reactors which have similar components. You can then talk about the impacts of nuclear reactors on society. E.g. clean energy and the production of isotopes (where I dumped my prepared isotopes, I did industrial and medical, and related this to their societal impact). You could also relate the discussion of the rate of nuclear reaction and controlled/uncontrolled reactions to nuclear weaponry + plutonium 239 production from nuclear reactors. Then you can discuss the pros and cons of nuclear weapons which are well documented. This was my take on the question :)
So judging by the little information offered by the raw marks database.....is a raw mark of say, 85% for this exam going to award a band 6? Lower? Higher?
17/20 FOR MULTIPLE CHOICE AND LEGIT ONLY STUDIED 2 1/2 DAYS.. Award plz 😂
For the working out of 30a, is the second work for correct working out? Since I can't remember I dont know if my mistake was somehow accidentally writing in the numbers wrong D:
Quanta to Quarks Solutions (My Solutions?!):
I realised I mixed up weak and strong force in my paper haha, I fixed it here though. I imagine a moderator can place these solutions in the official ones if they are happy with them.
Ughhh so mad at myself. Only looked at MC but already lost like 5 marks and I really did not like my answers for the rest of the paper. I was on track to get a band 6 but I think the highest I'll get is in the low 80's.
Didn't realise the loudspeaker wasn't connected to anything lol
Neither did I ;)
Don't worry, you know about Band cut-offs and stuff right? A mark in the 80's should still nab you a Band 6! ;D you just never know with this sort of thing, stay confident! ;D
Haha thanks Jamon, I do know about the cut offs but I'm always thinking the worst particularly since my friends found the exam fine. Just have to do my best for chem and then I'm done! ;D
I feel like question 20 is D, if it were DC it would be continuously clockwise, but with AC - the brushes dont change the sides every half turn . unless they do .
uh so for the 6 marker on discoveries that lead to new technologies. i put Bragg's experiment creating a better understanding of lattice structures within crystals which enabled the development of superconductivity to occur -> bcs theory -> MRI but idk if this is correct or i would get any marks?
For 30b, I would guess maybe one for identifying Back EMF/Lenz's law as a source of resistance in the coil, one for explaining what happens when the switch opens, and another for explaining how this effects the falling object. It is a pretty generous 3 marks (in my opinion).
That sounds good as part of an answer! Did you talk about generators and one other technology as well?
uh so for the 6 marker on discoveries that lead to new technologies. i put Bragg's experiment creating a better understanding of lattice structures within crystals which enabled the development of superconductivity to occur -> bcs theory -> MRI but idk if this is correct or i would get any marks?
I found the main section ok, but multiple choice and Quanta to Quarks were hard! I got really lost in the calculation for the option. What are people thinking for a band 6 cut off?
For Q20, this is actually the exact design of a "universal motor"- which was part of the Motors and Generators topic, so you can research that online if you wish. Basically, every time the AC switches, the magnetic solenoids also swap, which means the force is in the same direction. So essentially, the AC acts as a DC current.
I am pretty sure the answer to MC qu 17 is C, not A as suggested. An upwards deceleration is equal to downwards acceleration. As a= (v-u)/t, the increased value of acceleration means flight time is LESS, not greater. As horizontal range=velocity x time, the reduced time means horizontal range is also reduced, as illustrated in diagram C. :)
LMAO I MENTIONED BACK EMF hahaha for 30b.... thought i was wrong...
How well do you think we needed to explain the 3 technologies question? Cause my mind blanked and the only one i could think of was Maglev trains (discovery being superconductors) but I just said that they provided high speed transportation for society through superconductive magnets without explaining the specifics :O (i don't actually know the specifics, damn my brain couldn't function during that exam)
And also, this is probably really dumb for multiple choice question 8, the option D had more coils which means that the length of the wire is longer right? And the longer the wire, the greater the resistance.. Since V=IR and V is constant, a greater R would result in a lower I which means the galvanometer would deflect less wouldn't it? Idk whether the greater rate of change of magnetic flux is enough to exceed this (by doubling the velocity) which is why I chose option C :/ Is that some poor logic i had going on in the exam hahahah
Hey for the question on three technilogies, it asked HOW the discovery led to them, so we would have to mention how the discovery is applied right?
This is true! Hmm, how many lines did you have... 14! So you'd have to be brief in that effect. It seems like they want a "This is the discovery that was made and this is how it was made. This principle is applied in the technology in this way." Repeat 3 times.
I'd have written something like this for the generator, for example:
Faraday's experiments, which consisted of exposing coils to changing magnetic fields, established the idea of electromagnetic induction (the generation of an EMF when exposed to changing magnetic flux). This lead to the development of the electric generator, which uses induction to convert the kinetic energy of a rotor to electrical energy for external use.
Or, something like that. I interpret the question as needing to specifically mention HOW the discovery was made, because that is HOW it lead to the development of the technology. Then of course, as you say, a somewhat detailed mention of its application.
This is a weird question though; super broad, unlike anything I've seen in a Physics paper for quite a while! :)
EDIT: There is more than one way to skin a cat. Not taking my exact approach doesn't necessarily mean you can't score top marks!
Thank you Jamon!! One more question, does school play a big role in atar calculation, or is it your hsc performance more important??Your own cohort's performance decides how your internal marks get aligned. But only your own cohort; previous cohorts are useless in this calculation.
Hi guys, regarding Q23b shouldnt the direction of the magnetic field be out of the page inorder for the force to be up the page so that the electron travels undeflected, or am I really confused?
Hi guys, regarding Q23b shouldnt the direction of the magnetic field be out of the page inorder for the force to be up the page so that the electron travels undeflected, or am I really confused?
I got that too! But I was unsure about it.
Not quite! The electric field is going INTO the page, meaning the force on the electron is OUT of the page! I think you guys might have thought the initial field was a magnetic field, not an electric field? :)
For 25 A, how do you know using only the graphs that the relationship shown by team A is 'inverse-square' not simply inverse?
Ah, ok. I got that it was an electric field I just couldn't visualise how the field would effect it as I'd never dealt with an electric field in or out of the page, only down or up, so I just inferred the deflection like you would for a magnetic field. :/
For 25 A, how do you know using only the graphs that the relationship shown by team A is 'inverse-square' not simply inverse?
Hey Jamon!
We did question 10 in class and somehow our teacher said the correct answer is B. Our teacher said:
As we know the train is moving towards the right, the front door is now further away and the back door is closer. As the light is turned on the light travels at the same speed and same direction, the light will eventually reach door W first. Therefore W opens before Z.
I know you are right as well.
So the answer can be either C or B.
But which one is more correct?
Thanks