Could someone help me as to why Q14 answer is D?
Because it's a 7-median smoothed maximum wind speed, you take the data point for the 4th day and 3 days before and after that. That means that the one in the middle, vertically, is the data point for day 1 which is ~30yep - i plused 3points before the 4th day (including the 4th day) and 3 points after that... and then divided by 7 = approx 32....... what did I do wrong?
Could someone help me as to why Q14 answer is D?
Shouldn't question 8 be D? (Core)
Shouldn't question 8 be D? (Core)
Shouldn't question 8 be D? (Core)
Shouldn't question 8 be D? (Core)
Y-intercept is where x = 0
yep - i plused 3points before the 4th day (including the 4th day) and 3 points after that... and then divided by 7 = approx 32....... what did I do wrong?
Shouldn't Q13 be E as the data value for day 21 is higher than the data value of day 1, so therefore it should have irregular fluctuations with an increasing trend.Yeah i put down E aswell
Shouldn't Q13 be E as the data value for day 21 is higher than the data value of day 1, so therefore it should have irregular fluctuations with an increasing trend.I applied the same reasoning as you and got E as well.
That's MEAN smoothing, not MEDIANohh ok (misread that) - thanks 🙂
Yeah i put down E aswell
Did anyone else get C for networks?what question for networks?
Can someone explain Q7 CORE
how is the variable number of moths(less than 250, 250-500,more than 500) an ordinal value?
i thought they were both nominal variables
what question for networks?
How was question 16 (Core) A, doesn't make sense. I chose D btwthis involves correcting for seasonality:
Shouldn't question 8 be D? (Core)
Why is the answer question 23 D?Assuming the interest rate increases 0.51 each time - this means that #20 interest rate = 28.93...
Hey everyone! I'm Brady, the Further Maths lecturer for ATAR Notes. I'll gradually be putting up my suggested solutions for the exam. Take them with a grain of salt (interpret that how you will), as they will be subject to a bit of editing! Hope you're all happy with the exam.
Suggested Answers
(anything starred is subject to change)
Core:SpoilerQ1. D
Q2. B
Q3. D
Q4. D
Q5. B
Q6. E
Q7. E
Q8. B
Q9. A
Q10. A
Q11. D
Q12. D*
Q13. B*
Q14. D
Q15. D
Q16. A
Q17. A
Q18. D
Q19. C
Q20. D
Q21. E
Q22. B
Q23. D
Q24. B
Matrices:SpoilerQ1. B
Q2. E
Q3. C
Q4. C
Q5. A
Q6. D
Q7. A
Q8. A*
Networks:SpoilerQ1. B
Q2. C
Q3. A
Q4. D
Q5. C
Q6. E
Q7. D
Q8. B
Modules will be here in a minute!
Here's my answers for Graphs and Relations:Spoiler
- B
- C
- B
- E
- D
- C
- C
- D
Correct me if I am wrong.
Geometry and measurement:
1. D
2. D
3. C*
4. B
5. C
6. B
7. E*
8. C*
Geometry and measurement:Spoiler1. D
2. D
3. C*
4. B
5. C
6. B
7. E*
8. C*
my answers are all the same except for networks Q8 which i got C for. anyone else??ahhh - nope I got D, could someone explain this Q8 (networks)?
My answers were similar but I got B for Q3 and A for Q8, not sure how you got C's for them....?yeah I got B for Q3 and A for Q8 as well....
Here's my answers for Graphs and Relations:Spoiler
- B
- C
- B
- E
- D
- C
- C
- D
Correct me if I am wrong.
Here's my answers for Graphs and Relations:Spoiler
- B
- C
- B
- E
- D
- C
- C
- D
Correct me if I am wrong.
Just a few questions concerning the solutions here-
Why is Core question 2 B, I thought the whole point of upper and lower fencing was to modify the boxplot and the 5-point summary, so why wouldn't the answer be C?
Also, why is Core question 6 E?
And for networks for question 7, how is C a correct statement? Like why is the answer D?
Assuming the interest rate increases 0.51 each time - this means that #20 interest rate = 28.93...
Then, 7500 - 7233.83 = 266.17 (the total amount paid) minus the #20 interest rate of 28.93 (266.17 - 28.93) = 237.24
Hope it makes sense, someone else might be able to explain it better....
Could you please explain why Q8 is D? I got C. Thanks
I get how you got that answer but it asked for the payment which remains the same each time, so 100, as that is what the other ones are. Did anyone else think this?At the top it says "The interest rate for this investment remains constant, but the payment may vary" - so on the 20th payment to reach the $7500, the payment was higher while the interest rate stayed the same......
For Q2 the upper and lower fencing helps you determine outliers but the 5 figure summary is determined from the set of data values and these values are still the same, just some of them are outliers. The minimum and maximum values of the data set CAN be outliers which is why it's B.
For Q6 it has to be E because it's the only option that compares the same number of moths (more than 500) and demonstrates how the percentage that contained this amount of moths varies depending on the trap, supporting the contention. To support the association you have to compare the same class of number of moths across 2 or more of the trap types.
Sorry cant help with the networks one! Didn't do that module
My answers were similar but I got B for Q3 and A for Q8, not sure how you got C's for them....?
ahhh - nope I got D, could someone explain this Q8 (networks)?nevermind. just had a proper look at it and its B
At the top it says "The interest rate for this investment remains constant, but the payment may vary" - so on the 20th payment to reach the $7500, the payment was higher while the interest rate stayed the same......
Question 7 (Geometry) is really confusing. Can someone actually show working out to why the answer is E.nah man says in the q that the payment can change i think. so find interest, add to total 19 and take from 7500 to get your payment
Just a few questions concerning the solutions here-C is correct because if there are 8 edges then there could definitely be and isolated vertex. Bipartite graphs are what you use when allocations need to be made. hope this helps
Why is Core question 2 B, I thought the whole point of upper and lower fencing was to modify the boxplot and the 5-point summary, so why wouldn't the answer be C?
Also, why is Core question 6 E?
And for networks for question 7, how is C a correct statement? Like why is the answer D?
Geo and measurement
1.D
2.D
3.B
4.A*** (i thought radius was 10)
5.C
6.C
7.C
8.A
I got A for question 8 (geometry and measurement) through calculating the area of the triangle which connects the middle of the circles and calculating the area of each segment in this triangle (hard to explain) then got the area of the shaded region through subtracting both figures.
My decimals may be imprecise, but to show that it is not C:
Pick point A: (1.1, 7.6)
m=2 and n=5 so
Z = 2 * 1.1 + 5 * 7.6 = ~40.2
Pick point C: (3.8, 4.4)
Z = 2 * 3.8 + 5 * 4.4 = ~29.6
Because Z for point A is higher than for point C, C is not the answer. (Was looking for the minimum value and nothing false was observed)
To show that D is the answer:
Point D: Z = 2*7.8 + 6*12.4 = ~90
Point B: Z = 2*4.4 + 6*15 = ~98.8
So the maximum value when m=2 and n=6 is not at point D because 98.8 > 90. (Looking for the maximum and it is not at point D)
So the answer is D.
How’d you get A for Q4. Isn’t it B?
nah man says in the q that the payment can change i think. so find interest, add to total 19 and take from 7500 to get your paymentI think you misinterpret my question. I was referring to question 7 in geometry section, not financial maths.
I thought the radius is 10 LMFAO. i got it wrong.
But what is the answer for question 6 geo. i got C
Question 6 is B
I thought the radius is 10 LMFAO. i got it wrong.
But what is the answer for question 6 geo. i got C
I got B.
Which is done by creating a triangle to the surface of the water with a hypotenuse of 10cm and a verticle length of 8cm. Using Pythagoras we can find the radius of the water by doing 10^2 - 8^2 = 36. Square root 36 giving 6.
Answer is B
Question 7 (Geometry) is really confusing. Can someone actually show working out to why the answer is E.
I think I lost 7 marks, can I still get above 40? What would be the highest I could get assuming I get above 90% on the second exam? My average for sacs is 92%. I am freaking out 😭 Can someone please put me out of my misery and give an estimate?
I lost max 7 and min 6I’m so upset. Further was like the subject I was counting on to pull me through to a decent atar 😭😭.
same boat
I’m so upset. Further was like the subject I was counting on to pull me through to a decent atar 😭😭.
I think I lost 7 marks, can I still get above 40? What would be the highest I could get assuming I get above 90% on the second exam? My average for sacs is 92%. I am freaking out 😭 Can someone please put me out of my misery and give an estimate?
I think I lost 7 marks, can I still get above 40? What would be the highest I could get assuming I get above 90% on the second exam? My average for sacs is 92%. I am freaking out 😭 Can someone please put me out of my misery and give an estimate?
So my question is!
Based on various sources that confirm all of Brady's current answers for Core/Matrices/Networks
Im sitting on a 38/40 (Rip my networks understanding xD)
Is it still possible to get a 50?
Im rank 1, My teacher has told me that all the marks hes sent through to VCAA has been 100%
If I managed to get 59/60 or full marks is that enough for a 50?
Thanks! :D
Calculator says ~47
"it has been reported that you can only lose one mark over both exams if you want a 50. From there onwards, any mark lost is approximately a study score lost until about 45, where things become slightly more relaxed."
"from what I've heard, one mistake on the exam essentially means one mark off your study score."
"dropped 1 mark in exam + 94% SACS = Dropped 4 S.S"
More helpful anecdotes here
Calculator says ~47
"it has been reported that you can only lose one mark over both exams if you want a 50. From there onwards, any mark lost is approximately a study score lost until about 45, where things become slightly more relaxed."
"from what I've heard, one mistake on the exam essentially means one mark off your study score."
"dropped 1 mark in exam + 94% SACS = Dropped 4 S.S"
More helpful anecdotes here
How is the answer for Networks Q6 is E? Isn't the answer D? (4 ways to make an Eulerian trial possible?)You've got three in the middle from the middle vertex to each of the 3 odd degree vertexes
Ah cheers
So the absolute maximum I can achieve would be a 48 given I don't drop another mark?
Given that, this years exam is much harder than last would bellcurve for 48-50 be maybe an extra mark down as opposed to previousyears?
Yeah this year's exam 1 is a hell of a lot more difficult than last year's (I dropped only 1 mark on both the sample and actual 2016 exams, as opposed to potentially 3 marks this year). So the A+ cutoff will likely be much less than 36/40, and so you'd be good with losing a mark or two for a 50 and many more for a 48+
I lost max 7 and min 6Yea I lost 7 marks too, is there anyway of getting a 40 raw ??
same boat
yep - i plused 3points before the 4th day (including the 4th day) and 3 points after that... and then divided by 7 = approx 32....... what did I do wrong?
I don't know a huge amount about study scores, but looking at the 2016 scaling report it seems that the cutoff to get an A in exam 1 was 33 marks out of 40. While it will most likely change this year, you'll probably get an A or a B for this exam, which is really great! As far as I know you can still get a pretty good study score for further, as long as you do well in the second exam.Thank you :)
I'd recommend looking over your mistakes from this exam and putting them in your bound reference. This weekend do lots of practice exams, checkpoints questions, or you could even look over previous practice exams you've done and work through your mistakes. Even if you feel like you didn't do that well in this exam there's still Monday. Work as hard as you can and do your best, it'll pay off!!! Good luck friend :)
So is it confirmed that 13 is B? If so, could someone explain why it can’t be C?
Losing 7 marks on exam 1 equates to a score of 66/80. That puts you in the top 18.4% of students for the 2016 exam 1.38. Oh my god noooo 😭😭 My whole atar is going down by so much more than I anticipated 😭 thanks anyway for calculating it. Let me just go dig myself a hole and bury myself in it now 😭
Without knowing your rank, and assuming you get a very good score of 90% for exam 2 (only 8%of students got above 86% on exam 2 in 2016) I can estimate your SS in 2016 to be: Very Low A+ , Very Low A , Mid A+ = 38
Hey everyone! I'm Brady, the Further Maths lecturer for ATAR Notes. I'll gradually be putting up my suggested solutions for the exam. Take them with a grain of salt (interpret that how you will), as they will be subject to a bit of editing! Hope you're all happy with the exam.Why's network Q8 B, how would you work it out?
Suggested Answers
(anything starred is subject to change)
Core:SpoilerQ1. D
Q2. B
Q3. D
Q4. D
Q5. B
Q6. E
Q7. E
Q8. B
Q9. A
Q10. A
Q11. D
Q12. D
Q13. B
Q14. D
Q15. D
Q16. A
Q17. A
Q18. D
Q19. C
Q20. D
Q21. E
Q22. B
Q23. D
Q24. B
Matrices:SpoilerQ1. B
Q2. E
Q3. C
Q4. C
Q5. A
Q6. D
Q7. A
Q8. A
Networks:SpoilerQ1. B
Q2. C
Q3. A
Q4. D
Q5. C
Q6. E
Q7. D
Q8. B
Geometry and Measurement:SpoilerQ1. D
Q2. D
Q3. B
Q4. B
Q5. C
Q6. B
Q7. E*
Q8. A*
Graphs and Relations:Spoiler(Contributed by Deanator71)
Subject to change:
Q1. B
Q2. C
Q3. B
Q4. E
Q5. D
Q6. C
Q7. C
Q8. D
Why's network Q8 B, how would you work it out?
What's the answer for Core question 7?!
Hi, I’m hoping someone can help me. I did very well in my SACs throughout the year (98/100 total) and felt a lot of pressure about the exam today as this is my only good subject. I probably let the pressure get to me too much, I made some really, really, really dumb mistakes which I would normally never make and my total score was 36/40. Is my study score ruined? Is there absolutely any chance at all or still getting a 45? What would I need in E2? Thanks for your help :(
Question 13 of core, after placing the values of the time series into the calculator and producing the least squares regression line there is a positive gradient that suggests an increasing trend. It's not the largest gradient but the definition of an increasing trend is merely an increase over the long term which is clear here. Is this not true?Thought the same way. Shouldn't the answer be E then?
How is question 8 on matrices B? I got Ait is A
Thought the same way. Shouldn't the answer be E then?
So life is getting tough!
My SAC marks for math
CORE - 79%
FINANCE - 68%
MATRICES - 80%
NETWROKS - 62%
(ROUGH YEAR) - So for Exam one according to ATARNOTES i got 27/40...
Is their anyway for me to get a 32 or 33 STUDY SCORE???
My ranking is also not high, middle band
Hi everyone!what do you mean by this?
For Graph and relations question 7 is D as C gives the value of n as 200 which is outside the range of the full price.
What happens if you screw up in further exam 1 but do well in exam 2?Nothing inherently "happens" but you can definitely salvage/push your score up by doing very well on exam 2
For CORE question 19 and 20, are all interest only loans set out at perpetuities, so do their values always stay the same?The stem of the question says she pays the the intrest so what happens is the loan will increase via intrest in a month ($675) then she pays the amount that $675 hence going back to the original value of $225000 and this continually occurs.
Could someone explain the working for Q7 matrices
Could someone explain the working for Q7 matrices
Hey,
I am ranked 1st with a 100% SAC Average,
I scored 39/40 in Exam 1.
How many marks can I lose in Exam 2 and still pull off a 50?
Bump
Hey,
I am ranked 1st with a 100% SAC Average,
I scored 39/40 in Exam 1.
How many marks can I lose in Exam 2 and still pull off a 50?
none.Gotta take into account that this years exam was much harder than last years therein the cut offs will be less
Question 13 of core, after placing the values of the time series into the calculator and producing the least squares regression line there is a positive gradient that suggests an increasing trend. It's not the largest gradient but the definition of an increasing trend is merely an increase over the long term which is clear here. Is this not true?
Doing this also gives an r of less than 0.25 which means no relationship.
I think it would have to be quite a bit higher to be "best described" as E
what do you mean by this?I meant that full price is only for the first 150 pieces thus the cost of the 150 pieces comes out to be 370.
C is the total cost for n pies.
C = 0.8n + 250
C(200) = 0.8 * 200 + 250
C(200) = 410
He sells 150 at full price (x) and sells 50 at half price x/2 he wants to break even so cost of production = total cost sold for
410 = 150x + (50 *x)/2
410 = 150x + 25x
410 = 175x
x = 410/175
x = 2.34
so closest answer is $2.35 i.e. C
Yeah like I said, it is quite a small slope, but I think the term increasing trend is too subjective. As in what actually qualifies something to have an 'increasing trend' because my definition is what I stated earlier which is very vague....He's not talking about the slope, but rather the correlation coefficient is 0.25, which considered no correlation
I meant that full price is only for the first 150 pieces thus the cost of the 150 pieces comes out to be 370.The half-price pies still have the same costs as the full price pies, which is 410, since she has already made 200 pies
so 370/150=2.466 which is the break even point of the 150 pieces. So the answer should be D.
He's not talking about the slope, but rather the correlation coefficient is 0.25, which considered no correlation
To find the underlying trend, you should use smoothing rather than a linear regression line
The fluctuations are obscuring the underlying pattern in the time series, therefore smoothing is required
I know that, the slope is dependant on the correlation coefficient. But that is irrelevant, if you can tell me why precisely what qualifies a time series to have an increasing or decreasing trend. Because no where in the definition does it refer to the smoothed time series of any kind. Because to me if something is "increasing" over the period of time given it follows that it has an "increasing trend".
Are significant figures different to decimal places? eg. would the number 1.2345 to three significant figures be 1.235 or 1.23Yes. They are different. 3 sig figs is 1.23
The mean score last year was 50.9/80. You got 54/80. Also, this year's mean is almost certainly much lower than last year's, which means you will get in the low to mid 30s if you do equally well in exam 2. But for now, do as many previous exam 2s as possible in preparation for monday! Its still possible for you to get high 30s if you do well enough in itThank You! Makes me feel a bit better haha. Only aiming for a 32/33 so hopefully it works out :-)
Can someone explain question 5 on NETWROKS (maths exam), I got 4 but can't get question5. ALSO question6 netwroks please, i looked at the solutions but it still doesn't make sense, how do i handle these types of questions
Thanks
Questions 5 essentially asks the number of activities on the critical path(s). If you complete forward and backward scanning on the activity network for the question, you will find that activities C-F-H-M have the same EST and LST, and thus are on the only critical path. As any activity on the critical path cannot be delayed without increasing the project's minimum time, and that there are four activities on the critical path, the answer is 4 (C).i agree. question 6 was annoying at first but eventually got it
Question 6 made me muck up a few times. A good way to approach this question is to label the degree of each vertex, and it will result in the top, centre, and bottom two vertices being odd, making a total of four odd vertices. The question asks how many ways an edge can be removed to make an Eulerian trail. An Eulerian trail can only occur if there are two odd vertices. Removing any edge connecting two odd vertices will decrease their vertex to an even. (For example, removing the edge between the top vertex and centre vertex will decrease their vertex to 2 and 4 respectively). This will result in only two odd vertices left, allowing for an Eulerian trail to occur. In the graph, there are five edges connecting only the odd degree vertices, therefore there are 5 ways (E) to remove an edge for an Eulerian trail to be possible.
Hi,This questions seems to have been argued a bit. Which answer would you have chosen? I chose D because I think the rest can definitely be negative
Regarding my earlier query, are we now all agreed that seasonal indices can be negative and therefore D cannot be a correct answer to Core question 11?
Can we please discuss why question 13 is not C? To me it looks like there's a pattern that repeats every ~7 days. Must seasonality have perfectly equal width between every single crest and trough? I thought it can be approximately the same each time give or take 1 day, hence why i assumed it's seasonal with some random fuzziness in places, i.e. random fluctuations. How can you confidently, with 100% certainty, say it's B? See the attached image for my thought process.