Answers will be uploaded in this post when the exam is over.
thought the exam was alot easier than last year's exam 2, although the situation and the pressure really propelled its difficulty higher than it really should have been for mealot easier than last years????
alot easier than last years????
thought the exam was alot easier than last year's exam 2, although the situation and the pressure really propelled its difficulty higher than it really should have been for me
thought the exam was alot easier than last year's exam 2, although the situation and the pressure really propelled its difficulty higher than it really should have been for me
exam 2 was way better than exam 1!!!
Hopefully my performance on this exam helps me out with my exam 1 score. can a high A in exam 1 and a A plus in exam 2 still pull a low 40??
rank 1, in a weak cohort
I got 70/80 for last year's exam under exam conditions, whereas i don't think i can even break 60/80 for this exam...Are you the inverse of a normal person??
I disagree with you all. Yesterday was much easier than today. Yesterday I'd most likely get A+, but today? Nope.
Are you the inverse of a normal person??That's so punny.
That's so punny.Hey Dinwell, did you Dowell?
Hey Dinwell, did you Dowell?No, but NOTHING REALLY MATTERS anyway.
exam 2 was way better than exam 1!!!
Hopefully my performance on this exam helps me out with my exam 1 score. can a high A in exam 1 and a A plus in exam 2 still pull a low 40??
rank 1, in a weak cohort
Compared to yesterday's exam - yes, SO much more doable. Probably landed at least 10% higher than it too. Kind of surprised that there wasn't a question like the Ferris Wheel one from last year - but that's fortunate.
Also, how did anyone approach that sampling question? The one where you had to find the least value of n. (It's kind of cheesy that they had named population as adults from Mathsville and Statsville, or whatever they're called)
But that last page, woaAAHH, I grabbed answers out of no where. (What was the area between inverse of g, x-axis and that other line? I got 1 square unit, wtf)
Compared to yesterday's exam - yes, SO much more doable. Probably landed at least 10% higher than it too. Kind of surprised that there wasn't a question like the Ferris Wheel one from last year - but that's fortunate.I also got 1 square unit lol fairly certain it's wrong though
Also, how did anyone approach that sampling question? The one where you had to find the least value of n. (It's kind of cheesy that they had named population as adults from Mathsville and Statsville, or whatever they're called)
But that last page, woaAAHH, I grabbed answers out of no where. (What was the area between inverse of g, x-axis and that other line? I got 1 square unit, wtf)
No, but NOTHING REALLY MATTERS anyway.:( sorry to hear that, good luck for everything else.
p> 1/n. P=x/n. Therefore x>1what question is this??
what question is this??
what question is this??
what question is this??
What was the area between inverse of g, x-axis and that other line? I got 1 square unit, wtf
Anyone got a copy of the exam?Check forum copyright rules on the exam 1 thread.
uhh someone asked how to do the P hat question but deleted it...damn then i didnt get that? are you talking about the smallest number of n, for p hat to be greater than 0.99
I got 1/8 :oI got 1/8 for the area between the two functions (not the very last question), but not for that question.
Has everyone sat the exam? Or are there still people doing it at a later date?Everyone has to sit it at the same time. Otherwise there would be risk of cheating.
That wasn’t easy but I feel like it was so much better than last years!
Did anyone else get 41 for the number of trials and what did people get for the very last question?
Has everyone sat the exam? Or are there still people doing it at a later date?I got 39
That wasn’t easy but I feel like it was so much better than last years!
Did anyone else get 41 for the number of trials and what did people get for the very last question?
I got 39Same. I think you had to make Pr(X>1) > .99 so 1-Pr(X=0)-Pr(X=1)>.99. Then solve for n
Thoughts on A+ cutoff?
Same. I think you had to make Pr(X>1) > .99 so 1-Pr(X=0)-Pr(X=1)>.99. Then solve for ni did exactly this? but didnt get 39?i got somewhere near high 20s i cant remember exactly what
i did exactly this? but didnt get 39?i got somewhere near high 20s i cant remember exactly whatHmm. Did you end up solving
damn then i didnt get that? are you talking about the smallest number of n, for p hat to be greater than 0.99
i did exactly this? but didnt get 39?i got somewhere near high 20s i cant remember exactly what
You got 27 because you did x>=1 instead of x>1.but i did pr(x=0) plus pr(x=1)? thats odd you guys are right probably a calculating error on my behalf
Just gonna drop in, for that question I got n = 39 or something. I'm confident with the answer but I'm not sure if I used a valid method, I created function(n)=binomialcdf(defined with n parameter as max and amount), then subbed in random values of n until it's just above 0.99. This is basically the equivalent of putting it onto a spreadsheet and observing for the value of n.How did you write it out on the exam? Did you use calculator notation?
Between 66-69/80
lol why am I the only one who found today's exam harder than last years :-X
Does anyone recall what the probability was for the 'find value of n' question?its 39. just checked my calculator, its definitely 39
How did you write it out on the exam? Did you use calculator notation?
What did people get for the distance PQ?I got around 1.910. Was it 3 d.p.?
What did people get for the distance PQ?1.91m but other people got 1.90 so I'm not sure
What about the values of a for which f(x) had no solutions? (Last part of question 1)I got a>root(14)+3
I got a>root(14)+3
I also got 1 square unit lol fairly certain it's wrong thoughI'm seeing a lot of people get 1 squared unit for that one, including myself. for the area between g(x) and its inverse I got 1/4 however.
1.91m but other people got 1.90 so I'm not sureyeah i got 1.91
Edit: 1.90835472m
I got a>root(14)+3i got this with another answer,
i got this with another answer,Pretty sure the other answer was a<3-sqrt(14) or something.
i got this with another answer,Did you also say a<3-root(14)? I think you had to exclude that because p(x) has more than 1 turning point with those values.
Pretty sure the other answer was a<3-sqrt(14) or somethingyeah :)
Anyone manage to figure out question 20 of MC?
Pretty sure the other answer was a<3-sqrt(14) or something.
I did the same but I just realized it's wrong as a>0
Didn't it say that a was any real number? I thought it a>1 since that's the condition if we want just 1 turning point.
How are people saying yesterdays was harder??????? Did we get different exams???? With the exception of the last question yesterday, today’s one was ten times harder.I reckon today's exam 2 was harder than any of the previous years methods exam 2's
1.91m but other people got 1.90 so I'm not sure
Edit: 1.90835472m
Didn't it say that a was any real number? I thought it a>1 since that's the condition if we want just 1 turning point.
Ooooh maybe, but I think having a<0 would reflect the entire graph causing there to be more than one intersection right? not sure
Yeah a cant be negative if there's one intersection but also it can't be between 0 and 1.
Anyone manage to figure out question 20 of MC?
]
Yeah a cant be negative if there's one intersection but also it can't be between 0 and 1.
When will the full solutions be up? Should’ve written down what I got for the mc but ran out of time even to finish the exam :(
I'm working on them as fast as I can! I should get them up in the next 2 hours :)
I'm working on them as fast as I can! I should get them up in the next 2 hours :)Did you think this exam was harder than the last couple of years?
How did you guys get 1/8 for the question (on the second last page I think?) finding area? I got a different answer although 1/8 was one of the answers I got using a method.Do you mean for the area of inverse of g and the x=(whatever) line? Or the bounded area between g and its inverse? For the first one I got 1, for the second one I got 1/4
And for the three-mark question finding distance PQ, was there any other method that was less time-consuming than finding the coordinates of Q than using the distance formula? The distance formula felt like it has been used so much in these two exams.
Hi was wondering if someone could predict my study score31-34 depending on distribution this year, cohort strength etc
Finished at the 50th percentile for Units 3 and 4
First Exam- 22/40
2nd exam- 50/80
Thanks in advance
Anyone manage to figure out question 20 of MC?
Do you mean for the area of inverse of g and the x=(whatever) line? Or the bounded area between g and its inverse? For the first one I got 1, for the second one I got 1/4
VCAA 2018 Methods Exam 2 SECTION A Provisional Solutions
Solutions by Daniel Traicos at TWM Publications
Have had lots of requests for this. I'm still working on Section B. Please be patient :)
Neither, I think. It was the bounded area between two functions... f(x) and h(x)? h(x) was a straight line I think
VCAA 2018 Methods Exam 2 SECTION A Provisional SolutionsBrilliant, thanks!
Solutions by Daniel Traicos at TWM Publications
Have had lots of requests for this. I'm still working on Section B. Please be patient :)
ahhh yeah I think I got 1/8 for that one too. The two areas were both 1/16 I'm pretty sure
That was tough. It felt a lot easier than Exam 1, but still hard for me. Might be the pressure talking, but I thought that was harder overall than previous years (probably because I ran out of time and missed out on 4 precious marks), although the difficulty may have been similar The style of questions, especially most of multiple-choice, felt unconventional. Also lots of asking for decimals? (did anyone get 39 for the smallest value of n in the probability q because I just trial+errored a method i wasn't sure of)i got 39 also
Could someone predict study scorehigh 30s,
Exam 1: 34/40
exam 2 between 60 and 65 out of 80
high 30s,exam 1 score is good?! and exam 2 is not bad i think low 40s
is there any chance of a raw 25 with these scores or is it all gone now?You might be able to get 29-30 raw (assuming you meant 38/80 for exam 2)
Exam 1 - 16/40
Exam 2 - 38/40
You might be able to get 29-30 raw (assuming you meant 38/80 for exam 2)
wow that would be incredible if accurate, and yeah I meant 38/80 for exam 2don't quote me on that haha, it's just a prediction
Odd prediction, I know.~40-42 raw
Rank 10-20 Strong cohort with 90% average.
exam 1: 29/40
Exam 2: 70-75/80
Shot at 40?
How am I looking for a 40?~40-45 raw
Exam 1: 34-36/40
Exam 2: 70-75/80
With rank 1 in a decent cohort
Guys predict SS sacs 80% Exam 1: 30 ish and exam 2 60ish37 raw assuming you mean 30/40 and 60/80
Aren't these prediction posts more relevant in the study score prediction thread?haahahah im too afraid to go there with my exam 1 score
Aren't these prediction posts more relevant in the study score prediction thread?
If i averaged around 64% for SACs (Hard SACs) and got 28-30 out of 40 for Exam 1 and around 50-60 for exam 2, what study scores would i be looking at (hopefully between 22-28)22-28? 30/40 and a 60/80 will easily net a 35-37
But isnt exam 2 out of 120??No, exam 2 is out of 80.
I made an account just to vent and create an outlet for my mental anguish post-Methods :(You would get around a 29 raw, and yes, this exam's mcq questions were brutal
I need a study score of 25 or above for ALL the courses I want to do which I thought was going to be achievable until... today. I found exam 1 hard and am expecting ~15/40, found exam 2 more accessible but the difficulty of the MC questions messed up my positive mindset so I wouldn't be surprised if I bombed that as well. Might I add that I just found out my calc was in degrees THE WHOLE TIME? YEAH. Marks for the entire bridge question? Gone. I feel sick while typing this. I'm expecting ~40/80 at best.
Is there any hope for me to get a score of raw 25 or above? I'm currently ranked average in a very strong cohort (sucks to be dragging all my mates scores down but that's the price I have to pay for being forced to do a subject I detest as a prereq :-\). My school's SACs do get scaled up but I guess there's a slim chance of moderation saving my grades considering I bombed both exams.
I'm sorry for being so whiny in this post, it's just that I just have no one else to talk to about this because I'm so ashamed if I'm being quite frank.
No, exam 2 is out of 80.
In total, both exams add up to 120.
But isnt exam 2 out of 120??exam 2 is out of 120 (60 before doubling) in further, not methods
What study score do you think i would get if i got 25/40 for Exam 1 and 42/80 for exam 2You've gotta be kidding. Stop with the SS predictions. vox nihili literally just said to...
The multi choice was honestly a breeze up to about Q18, honestly you just needed good algebra skills to do well. I don't really get what people mean when they say it was unconventional questions. I would've thought maths was maths and it didn't have its own style o.0Not everyone is as smart as you then, and it's not good to boast if you found it easy
What Raw Study Score for Methods am I looking at?34 raw
SACS: Averaged 74%
Exam 1: 25/40
Exam 2: 55/80
The multi choice was honestly a breeze up to about Q18, honestly you just needed good algebra skills to do well. I don't really get what people mean when they say it was unconventional questions. I would've thought maths was maths and it didn't have its own style o.0
Could someone please predict:~45-46 raw
Exam 1: 36-37/40
Exam 2: 76/80
The multi choice was honestly a breeze up to about Q18, honestly you just needed good algebra skills to do well. I don't really get what people mean when they say it was unconventional questions. I would've thought maths was maths and it didn't have its own style o.0
Not everyone is as smart as you then, and it's not good to boast if you found it easy
Given this thread is about discussing the exam i'd say it's perfectly fine to describe one's opinion on the difficulty of the exam. In my opinion the multiple choice was indeed pretty standard up till 18. You have your typical domain and range questions, tangent line questions, period questions, transformations, find integral for an area questions etc. Probability was notably weak on MC. I'd highly advise any future students to pay attention to questions that tend to reoccur. A lot of MC questions are pretty predictable if you do the questions from the last few VCAA exams.Can you please stop quoting my post for no reason? Honestly I made a fair point when i said that True Dat shouldn't boast if he found it easy when there would be others (including myself) who found this exam harder than usual. Also when you said that alot of the mc questions are predictable from past papers, this exam was alot harder, and i've done quite a few vcaa exam 2's and the mcq's were a lot more demanding and different to the past years vcaa exam 2's.
Short answer was great too. Good mix of easy, difficult and challenging questions.
Yep, perhaps thread should be renamed to study score prediction methods haha. These ain't stopping.
sorry about that hahaha i guess everyone is jusy anxious about their scores
Maybe the extended response parts but the M/C felt a bit weird and different to standard
I found the multiple choice super challenging but no one else that I talked to had a problem with it. I leave multi-choice till the end so I had to guess some of the answers because I was running out of timeMulti-choice was definitely harder than usual
Moving back on track, what did everyone do with the question of:
Find the area between g^-1(x), the x axis, and x=2a/3?
Was this the third last? I believe it was just 2 minus an integral. I got 1 square unit.Same. I plugged in random values of a and it kept spitting out 1 square unit so I was like this can't be right but at least it's not spitting out a negative area.
Guys, difficulty is subjective. People can think the exam is easy if they want, but there’s no need to make the rest of us feel like dumbasses. Sometimes I think people on atarnotes forget that there are ‘average’ students lol... And the thing is the majority of students fall under that category. Afterall only 9% of today’s test takers will get a 40+...
Same. I plugged in random values of a and it kept spitting out 1 square unit so I was like this can't be right but at least it's not spitting out a negative area.Got 1 unit^2 aswell. I think it was 2-integral from 0 3/a of g(x)
Guys, difficulty is subjective. People can think the exam is easy if they want, but there’s no need to make the rest of us feel like dumbasses. Sometimes I think people on atarnotes forget that there are ‘average’ students lol... And the thing is the majority of students fall under that category. Afterall only 9% of today’s test takers will get a 40+...
Guys, difficulty is subjective. People can think the exam is easy if they want, but there’s no need to make the rest of us feel like dumbasses. Sometimes I think people on atarnotes forget that there are ‘average’ students lol... And the thing is the majority of students fall under that category. Afterall only 9% of today’s test takers will get a 40+...
Just wondering if anyone had the extended response answers?Atarnotes user Dantraicos is writing them currently on behalf of TVM Publications and they will likely be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow :) You can find multiple choice answers on page 7 if you wish.
Atarnotes user Dantraicos is writing them currently on behalf of TVM Publications and they will likely be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow :) You can find multiple choice answers on page 7 if you wish.Hey Lear. What did you get for the final question? Area between the inverse and g(x) I believe. Also, do you remember what you did for the final probability question? The one that asks for the probability a non year 12 is elite?
Hey Lear. What did you get for the final question? Area between the inverse and g(x) I believe. Also, do you remember what you did for the final probability question? The one that asks for the probability a non year 12 is elite?
Just offering my 2 cents. The guys at my school had two separate interpretations, Pr(elite|non year 12) or Pr(elite intersection non year 12). So for the first one it was 0.0227 and the other interpretation was 0.019... We aren't sure which is correct though.Thanks Daniel. I did the conditional one (I think?) but while I was doing it I was torn between the two.
My MCQ answers are the same as crouchie and Dantraicos.
Below are my Extended Response answersSection B Question 11a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h i
1h ii
1h iii
Did you intend to just quote yourself?LOL no idk why I did that. Removed it.
My MCQ answers are the same as crouchie and Dantraicos.a = 0 for 1f
Below are my Extended Response answersSection B Question 11a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h i
1h ii
1h iii
was a=2 or a=0 for the last part of question 1 of short answer?a = 0 for 1f
I got absolutely destroyed by both methods exams, ended up with a 34 thanks to sweet sweet SAC scaling.hmmmm what you get in english?
And in two years I'll be a doctor. *
One.exam.doesn't.change.your.life.
You'll be fine everyone.
*second humble brag, my mediocrity in methods didn't even stop me from landing in the top 10% of my Biomed cohort for maths. Seriously, one exam does not change your life.
1g looks wrong as well?? my heart is racing right now please help?
a = 0 for 1fHey sine, did you think exam 1 and 2 this year was harder than usual?
otherwise it looks good!
a = 0 for 1f
1g seems correct to me.
a = 0 for 1f
otherwise it looks good!
a = 0 for 1f
hmmmm what you get in english?
1g looks wrong as well?? my heart is racing right now please help?
1g looks wrong as well?? my heart is racing right now please help?1g looks fine.
Guys how do you already know the answers when we haven't done the exam yet??Because we did it today? Are you sure you had the date right for your methods exam buddy?
Guys how do you already know the answers when we haven't done the exam yet??
Guys how do you already know the answers when we haven't done the exam yet??Great troll.
Hey sine, did you think exam 1 and 2 this year was harder than usual?I haven't done the exams fully yet so not the best person to deteremine the difficulty of the exams but from just looking over the exams and seeing what needs to be done to get to the answer I would think exam 1 was slightly tougher than usual and exam 2 looked to be normal difficulty (similar to 2014-2015).
Actually if a=0, then stationary points exists for x=1,x=0, x=-2not sure what you mean but
because we now have x=1,-1- (1^1/2), -1 + (1^1/2) which become x=1,-1 - 1, -1 +1
I haven't done the exams fully yet so not the best person to deteremine the difficulty of the exams but from just looking over the exams and seeing what needs to be done to get to the answer I would think exam 1 was slightly tougher than usual and exam 2 looked to be normal difficulty (similar to 2014-2015).Hey Sine. If 2014-2015 is considered normal difficulty. Where does 2016 and 2017 lie on the difficulty scale?
not sure what you mean but
a only = 0 for 1f.
When you move onto the other questions a is any real number
I haven't done the exams fully yet so not the best person to deteremine the difficulty of the exams but from just looking over the exams and seeing what needs to be done to get to the answer I would think exam 1 was slightly tougher than usual and exam 2 looked to be normal difficulty (similar to 2014-2015).Lol there's no way this was comparable to 2014-2015, 2014 and 2015 were dead easy, even 2016 and 2017 were reasonable, this years exam 1 and 2 were completely fucked
not sure what you mean but
a only = 0 for 1f.
When you move onto the other questions a is any real number
My MCQ answers are the same as crouchie and Dantraicos.
Below are my Extended Response answersSection B Question 11a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
1g
1h i
1h ii
1h iiiSection B Question 22a
2b
2c
2d i(http://oi68.tinypic.com/2i06a93.jpg)
2d iiSection B Question 33a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3fSection B Question 44a
4b i
4b ii
4c i
4c ii
4c iii
4d i
4d ii
4e
4f
4g
Hey Sine. If 2014-2015 is considered normal difficulty. Where does 2016 and 2017 lie on the difficulty scale?On the tougher side of things - I think 2013, 2016, 2017 are probably the hardest three exams.
Lol there's no way this was comparable to 2014-2015, 2014 and 2015 were dead easy, even 2016 and 2017 were reasonable, this years exam 1 and 2 were completely fuckedman under normal conditions i would smash out exam 1 and exam 2s with relative ease. scoring easily in the above 45 range. under timed conditions, im a complete idiot. i think your perception is skewed due to the latter. (not to be rude, im sure your smarter than me) exam 1 was in my opinion the hardest exam 1 in any vcaa exam, same with exam 2 2017. i hope your ruminative state post exams is just you being a perfectionist and that you aced both if not exam 2 in methods. even if you didnt. it doesnt matter :)
Yep, it was to the nearest square metre. Whether that answer is accepted will be determined on the assessor's day (which I think will be Saturday)
Was 3C to the nearest whole number or was it alright to leave it in 550-900/π sqr units?
Guys how do you already know the answers when we haven't done the exam yet??Fun fact: the exam was today and so the answers are available :P
Yep, it was to the nearest square metre. Whether that answer is accepted will be determined on the assessor's day (which I think will be Saturday)FML haha
i dont get your 4 dii
Was 3C to the nearest whole number or was it alright to leave it in 550-900/π sqr units?
man under normal conditions i would smash out exam 1 and exam 2s with relative ease. scoring easily in the above 45 range. under timed conditions, im a complete idiot. i think your perception is skewed due to the latter. (not to be rude, im sure your smarter than me) exam 1 was in my opinion the hardest exam 1 in any vcaa exam, same with exam 2 2017. i hope your ruminative state post exams is just you being a perfectionist and that you aced both if not exam 2 in methods. even if you didnt. it doesnt matter :)I didn't come anywhere nearing exam 1 and 2, what made you think I did? This year's exam 1 was definitely the hardest exam 1 ever, but imo this year's exam 2 was also the hardest, and alot harder than last years exam 2
i dont get your 4 dii
I didn't come anywhere nearing exam 1 and 2, what made you think I did? This year's exam 1 was definitely the hardest exam 1 ever, but imo this year's exam 2 was also the hardest, and alot harder than last years exam 2to each their own. idk, we will have to wait for the grade distributions. after all a good maths student only listens to the numbers (cold hard statistics).
I'm just writing up question 5 now. I'm sorry this is taking so long. I had a 3-hour Engineering exam this morning and so I had to take a break. Solutions to Section B will be up soon :D
I didn't check this - neither do I, \(550-\frac{900}{\pi}\approx263.521\)...
to each their own. idk, we will have to wait for the grade distributions. after all a good maths student only listens to the numbers (cold hard statistics).I think I'm the only one who found last years exam 2 easier than today's. Oh well
Ik its not the required form, but do you think they would accept it? So annoying to think a mark would be lost there
4dii - Would it be sufficient to compare the proportions of both towns for the mark?I said 95% of the proportions of the statsville people were between (a,b) (i forgot the values) and the mathsland (or whatever it was called) population proportion is greater than that interval. Not sure if I'd get a mark for my response.
4dii - Would it be sufficient to compare the proportions of both towns for the mark?I wouldn't suggest so as, even if two population proportions are different, this may not indicate statistical significance (however, if a proportion is outside of a specified Confidence Interval, it could be considered statistically significant).
Reading through the solutions that have been posted so far has made me feel a lot better honestly. I don't even wanna begin to articulate the grief I felt walking out of the exam room after having left 3 questions on the last page blank. My time management for exam 2 went down the drain the minute I spent 5 mins too long on the multi section. C'est la vie :'(Lol. You only left 3 questions?
I said 95% of the proportions of the statsville people were between (a,b) (i forgot the values) and the mathsland (or whatever it was called) population proportion is greater than that interval. Not sure if I'd get a mark for my response.
Finally finished the exam 2 provisional solutions!
Get them here: https://atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=181368.msg1083392#msg1083392
Promise I won't delete these ones.
Thanks so much for this contribution; they're fantastic.
any chance we could get the mark allocations for each question? (as in what each question was worth, not what information resulted in the mark)
any chance we could get the mark allocations for each question? (as in what each question was worth, not what information resulted in the mark)Sure!
This is, unfortunately, also not likely to get the mark as you have misinterpreted the confidence interval - it doesn't mean that 95% of the population is necessarily inside that range.Hi for that same question, if i compared the sample sizes of the two towns do you think i might get a mark? Statsland had a sample size way bigger than Mathland..
If we took infinitely many samples, 95% of the Confidence Intervals constructed (provided they are all 95% CIs) would contain the actual population proportion (whilst 5% will not). This is effectively the reason why we can't compare the proportions from each town - we have the population proportion for Mathsland, but the sample proportion obtained for Statsland may not reflect the actual value (i.e. this particular CI may be one of the 5% that does not contain the actual population proportion). For these types of problems, it is imperative to keep in mind that the sample proportion is dependent on the sample obtained and is therefore a variable, where as the population proportion is constant
any chance we could get the mark allocations for each question? (as in what each question was worth, not what information resulted in the mark)That was 100% given to you with the exam...
I gave my answer to 3d in degrees and not radians, so gradient = 2.000.Wait... If 3d was the gradient question, it wasn't 2.00 degrees.
The question didn't specify whether they wanted it in radians, do you think this will still be accepted?
I got absolutely destroyed by both methods exams, ended up with a 34 thanks to sweet sweet SAC scaling.you're my inspiration brother, I actually love you. And yeah hopefully my sac scaling will help me out, i'm rank 1 and probably got A+ in exam 1 on Wednesday, but I got my actual ass handed to me Thursday methods exam 2. Like seriously, id be happy if I got 60-70%. In all my timed methods practice exams I never got below 80%. but this exam on the other hand was easily the craziest thing I ever had the misfortune to experience.
And in two years I'll be a doctor. *
One.exam.doesn't.change.your.life.
You'll be fine everyone.
*second humble brag, my mediocrity in methods didn't even stop me from landing in the top 10% of my Biomed cohort for maths. Seriously, one exam does not change your life.
you're my inspiration brother, I actually love you. And yeah hopefully my sac scaling will help me out, i'm rank 1 and probably got A+ in exam 1 on Wednesday, but I got my actual ass handed to me Thursday methods exam 2. Like seriously, id be happy if I got 60-70%. In all my timed methods practice exams I never got below 80%. but this exam on the other hand was easily the craziest thing I ever had the misfortune to experience. I actually want to kill myself after that catastrophe
VCAA 2018 Methods Exam 2 Provisional Solutions
Solutions by Daniel Traicos at TWM Publications
Interesting exam! Definitely some difficult ones!
My teacher said that a difficult exam 1 normally means an easier exam 2...How did you find yesterday's exam in terms of difficulty?
Show how muc he know bout normal distribution! :P
Well done Dan. I'm sure the community appreciates your effort.Wow, you two are absolute legends. Can’t thank you both enough.
So sorry I wasn't able to do mine in time, I'll work on mine over today/the weekend and put CAS screenshots (TI CX) for those using that.
Thanks again, you're a champ.
Wow, you two are absolute legends. Can’t thank you both enough.
Well done Dan. I'm sure the community appreciates your effort.
So sorry I wasn't able to do mine in time, I'll work on mine over today/the weekend and put CAS screenshots (TI CX) for those using that.
Thanks again, you're a champ.
How did you guys get 1/8 for the question (on the second last page I think?) finding area? I got a different answer although 1/8 was one of the answers I got using a method.
And for the three-mark question finding distance PQ, was there any other method that was less time-consuming than finding the coordinates of Q than using the distance formula? The distance formula felt like it has been used so much in these two exams.
Haha, exam 2s are just a killer to write up nicely. The CAS screenshots I think will really benefit people. Looking forward to reading your solutions soon. See you at spesh E1 :DAgreed. Very hard to write up nicely as the algebra can sometimes get so gnarly. And then the CAS screenshots can take up heaps of space, so have to find efficient ways to show steps (such as solve(derivative(f(x))=0,x) which is 1 step which normally takes 2).
Can somebody please explain how you were supposed to do question 5 on the short answer? I remember it saying something about an inverse of g, and when I put it in my calculator it gave me a strange result, the answers I've seen have just been basic integrals and such. How we're you meant to go about solving it? I got that 2a/3 x g(2a/3) was equal to 2, but I can't see how this helps. ThanksHere's how I thought about it:
Does anyone have a prediction of the a+ cutoff for exam 1 and exam 2 respectively?
Thanks
I predict the cutoffs will be:
Exam 1: 33-34 / 40
Exam 2: 67-68 / 80
Hi dantraicos...
Solutions look good. The only one you buggered up is 3f... You can't use trig rule as it is not a triangle, as the angle pi/90 is with the horizontal, not the point P... Otherwise everything else looks correct.
cheers,
Worm
Hi dantraicos...
Solutions look good. The only one you buggered up is 3f... You can't use trig rule as it is not a triangle, as the angle pi/90 is with the horizontal, not the point P... Otherwise everything else looks correct.
cheers,
Worm
Wait....crap. If a person used the triangle method do you think all 3 marks would be taken off?
Wait....crap. If a person used the triangle method do you think all 3 marks would be taken off?unlikely that you actually lose all 3 marks since assessors normally don't like to give out 0/3 when a student has actually written something down. If you have covered some methods concept in your working out you may be able to get 1/3.
exam reports are finally available 8)interesting that exam 1 8b only 3% got full marks on and the final question only 4%
exam 1
https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/exams/mathematics/2018/mm1_examrep18.pdf
exam 2
https://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/exams/mathematics/2018/mm2_examrep18.pdf
interesting that exam 1 8b only 3% got full marks on and the final question only 4%what % did you think would get full marks on 8b and 9d?
what % did you think would get full marks on 8b and 9d?didn't really think of it at the time but historically exam tends not to be that difficult. Usually the most difficult question is still answered correctly by ~10% of the cohort.
interesting that exam 1 8b only 3% got full marks on and the final question only 4%