ATAR Notes: Forum

Archived Discussion => 2009 => End-of-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Accounting => Topic started by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 02:30:01 pm

Title: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 02:30:01 pm
how did everyone else go?i personally think it was definitely easier than vcaa 08
there were a few tricky questions and i have my question booklet that i'll post up later i've written down most of my response next to it and u guys can compare it and tell me what i did wrong or stuffed up as well as urself

edit : exams up mind u after what u guys said im not that confident stuffed up like 3-4 now lol

(http://i35.tinypic.com/20p5641.jpg)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/ny66nm.jpg)
(http://i38.tinypic.com/mt2ozs.jpg)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/zlqc5h.jpg)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/e7gwpj.jpg)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/30i9i77.jpg)
(http://i36.tinypic.com/5nn4a9.jpg)
(http://i34.tinypic.com/2m3iwqf.jpg)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 02:34:53 pm
what did you do for the posters and ball question? product cost it or remove from selling price?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: sdhains on November 05, 2009, 02:37:31 pm
what did you do for the posters and ball question? product cost it or remove from selling price?

I got this question wrong. The posters are selling expenses therefore are only included when the stock is valued at NRV. So you subtract the $5 poster expense from the balls which were valued at NRV.

How many marks do you think I will lose if i did everything else right, but treated the poster expense as a product cost?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 02:39:31 pm
So did I. According to my Accounting teacher it might not be entirely incorrect.

My point is that why would they tell you 90 are remaining at the end?

Okay so if we got this wrong, reckon we could get one of the three marks?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 02:41:16 pm
oh shit i just added it to 90 out of the 100 of pro junior balls might've gotten it entirely wrong the figure i got for values of stock is 10530
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 02:47:12 pm
I think you will get a mark for the pre junior total 1 for the pro senior total and one for the pro leather total
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: lilyrose on November 05, 2009, 02:47:24 pm
did you have to include the import duties?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: andrew4443 on November 05, 2009, 02:49:35 pm
So did I. According to my Accounting teacher it might not be entirely incorrect.

My point is that why would they tell you 90 are remaining at the end?

Okay so if we got this wrong, reckon we could get one of the three marks?

The whole '90 remaining' thing confused me, but it really came down to the fact of whether the posters were necessary to get the balls in the condition to sell. My arguement being that they were only necessary to sell the item, so they are only used in calculation of NRV
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 02:50:49 pm
Do you think there's room for alternative interpretations?

If that's 3 marks gone.....FML.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: PepsiMax on November 05, 2009, 02:51:05 pm
It says that posters are purchased as required.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Nelle on November 05, 2009, 02:51:50 pm
I got stock writedown of $800 due to including the import duties as a product cost, therefore increasing the unit cost to $65.
Then the NRV would have been $55 due to the subtraction of the $5 that was a cost necessary for the sale.

I don't know if that is incorrect, did anyone get the same?  
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: phanphy on November 05, 2009, 02:52:36 pm
What did you guys get for Stock Write Down? (Same qn)

I got 800
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: andrew4443 on November 05, 2009, 02:53:37 pm
Do you think there's room for alternative interpretations?

If that's 3 marks gone.....FML.
Possibly, it was pretty ambiguous.

I got 800 as well Phanphy
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: chris1991 on November 05, 2009, 02:53:42 pm
Yes i got a SWD of 800 as well. Import duties shouldve been treated as product costs
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 02:56:14 pm
Yeh i think $800 was correct. However do you think if you, as i have listed:

Pro Junior: Right Amount
Pro Senior: Right Amount
Pro Leather: Wrong Amount (Due to incorrect Stock Write Down)

and then carried that mistake down to the General Jorunal entry, how many marks would it cost? Would consequentials apply?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 02:56:52 pm
I got $800 too.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: phanphy on November 05, 2009, 02:57:31 pm
Yeh i think $800 was correct. However do you think if you, as i have listed:

Pro Junior: Right Amount
Pro Senior: Right Amount
Pro Leather: Wrong Amount (Due to incorrect Stock Write Down)

and then carried that mistake down to the General Jorunal entry, how many marks would it cost? Would consequentials apply?

you should get 2/3 for that qn. I did the same
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: jay1993 on November 05, 2009, 02:58:51 pm
I got stock writedown of $800 due to including the import duties as a product cost, therefore increasing the unit cost to $65.
Then the NRV would have been $55 due to the subtraction of the $5 that was a cost necessary for the sale.

I don't know if that is incorrect, did anyone get the same?  

I did exactly the same :)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 02:59:10 pm
Yeh that's what i thought, and if the mistake is carried through then it is not penalised again, so really its only worth one mark.
Not a bad outcome considering such a bad mistake.
I suppose that is the advantage of showing working in accounting.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: dukesofmelbourne on November 05, 2009, 03:08:44 pm
yeh i got 800 too

what did ppl for for the sale and purchases return?
i ran out of lines :S
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 03:10:04 pm
same, did you need one extra line?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 03:11:41 pm
I Had:

OCT 20:  Sales Returns
             GST Clearing
                   Debtors Control
                   - Name
             Stock Control
                   Cost of Sales
OCT 22: Creditors Control
            - Name
                   Stock Control
                   GST Clearing

Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: JadeR on November 05, 2009, 03:12:33 pm
Is someone going to post their answers? I am stressing about how I went!
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: dukesofmelbourne on November 05, 2009, 03:13:50 pm
same
but they left one line to short so i was confused
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 03:14:59 pm
It was actually quite stupid because you couldn't group similar accounts as the transactions were on different days.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 03:16:00 pm
exam's up guys one the first page
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: phanphy on November 05, 2009, 03:17:07 pm
I got stock writedown of $800 due to including the import duties as a product cost, therefore increasing the unit cost to $65.
Then the NRV would have been $55 due to the subtraction of the $5 that was a cost necessary for the sale.

I don't know if that is incorrect, did anyone get the same?  

you got the right answer but wrong working.
have to minus 7 from each customs duty.

but right answer (Y)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: andrew4443 on November 05, 2009, 03:20:11 pm
What did everyone say for the question about liquidity?

I said the net effect would be worse liqudity for the firm as although QAR and WCR increased (increasing liquidity) this was only marginal compared to the large increases in stock and debtors turnover (which worsens liquidity)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: boogabrain4 on November 05, 2009, 03:33:02 pm
yes same andrew...even though WCR increased a lot, QAR didn't, and DTO and STO were dramatically worse, so that means that the reason WCR is a lot better is cos of all the Debtors and Stock that they have (which they aren't able to turn into cash) which is listed as Current Assets, so i said it didn't improve
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 03:33:39 pm
I said that debtors turnover and stock turnover are more to do with the firm's efficiecny asnd are not direcltly linked with the liquidity of the business like working capital ration and quick asset ratio. then blah blah blah.

Aslong as my theory is ok, i'd say around 85-88/90 depending on consequentials
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: boogabrain4 on November 05, 2009, 03:38:07 pm
I said that debtors turnover and stock turnover are more to do with the firm's efficiecny asnd are not direcltly linked with the liquidity of the business like working capital ration and quick asset ratio. then blah blah blah.

Aslong as my theory is ok, i'd say around 85-88/90 depending on consequentials

dto and sto are linked very closely with liquidity, no?
if they can't collect debts/turnover stock, how are they going to get cash to pay creditors, wages etc?!
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 03:39:35 pm
Stock isn't included in quick asset ratio and it still increased, if only marginally.
And debtors by definition, as it is included in the quick asset ratio, can be readily turned into cash.

Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: YT_17 on November 05, 2009, 03:40:40 pm
quention 1.2 part and quention 1.5 part were confusing.......maybe for others not.....but i found it did confuse me
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: sophx on November 05, 2009, 03:41:32 pm
effect of depreciation expense on cash flow? it was none right? :S
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: PepsiMax on November 05, 2009, 03:41:45 pm
For another key indicator, I stated 'Creditors Turnover Ratio'.

I was stuck for answers, but I thought that the CTR gave a fairly good indication of a business' liquidity.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: unknown12 on November 05, 2009, 03:43:00 pm
Yeh i don't know, i think that liquidity question is going to be hard to mark
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: sdhains on November 05, 2009, 03:43:49 pm
effect of depreciation expense on cash flow? it was none right? :S
I said that it does not directly effect cash flows and that depreciation is an example of an expense which is not a cash payment. However, as it detracts from profit, claiming depreciation expense can have a positive effect on cash flow as the more expenses claimed the less profit one needs to claim to the tax office. So ultimately claiming depreciation means you dont need to pay as much tax.

I may have been going to far with this ..
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nikinoo on November 05, 2009, 03:48:00 pm
effect of depreciation expense on cash flow? it was none right? :S

yeh i said that depreciation does not directly effect the cash flow as it is a consumption of economic benefit in the form of a decrease in assets (delivery van), therefore decreasing net profit as an increase in depreciation expense..
cant remember the end.. but thats it =)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: mtwtfss on November 05, 2009, 03:48:40 pm
I just said something about how its only an assumption made to allocate the expense of owning the asset over the period of its working life, thus doesn't actually effect cash flow. however it may when the business comes to sell the asset.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 03:53:36 pm
1.1.2 - was it $12375 accum depn? and $3625 loss?

2.3.2 - what was actual and budgeted rent revenue? i had $24.8k and $24k
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Nelle on November 05, 2009, 04:08:44 pm
1.1.2 I got the same as you :)

2.3.2 I said a $1000 difference as the rent revenue changed in August, resulting in five months of $2200 rent revenue.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nikinoo on November 05, 2009, 04:11:16 pm
i have no qualms about it, i don't think i lost 1 mark.
You muppets can continue quarreling like uneducated pigs...but you lost marks...and i didnt
i know how to stop fights! just ace the exam! like i did.

nobody cares =)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 04:11:43 pm
stfu lc3
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 04:12:31 pm
1.1.2 I got the same as you :)

2.3.2 I said a $1000 difference as the rent revenue changed in August, resulting in five months of $2200 rent revenue.

yeah i was going to do that too but it said 'commencing with the payment due on Aug 31'
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: charley on November 05, 2009, 04:17:15 pm
i have no qualms about it, i don't think i lost 1 mark.
You muppets can continue quarreling like uneducated pigs...but you lost marks...and i didnt
i know how to stop fights! just ace the exam! like i did.

Hope you lost shitloads of marks and anyway this is a discussion what you said not a disccussion!

for the last question is interest cover ratio an answer and did anyone else notice that this year they didn't actually ask for any narrations and that the didn't stipulate that GST IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS QUESTION for budgeting?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 04:21:49 pm
i wrote cash flow indicator lolol

Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 04:22:43 pm
LC3, you are so rude and uncouth - we are NOT uneducated pigs, just students who really care about their grades. How dare you insult us?

I am sure that it is the over confident people like you who do not appreciate the complexities of exams. Trust me, I did tonnes of practice exams, have rank 1 in a very, very good school and yet I appreciate the tricky parts of the exam.

So get rid of your ego and arrogance and be a bit nicer.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: rlobo1 on November 05, 2009, 04:54:14 pm
i have no qualms about it, i don't think i lost 1 mark.
You muppets can continue quarreling like uneducated pigs...but you lost marks...and i didnt
i know how to stop fights! just ace the exam! like i did.


i'll smash u u arrogant sack of shit
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Noblesse on November 05, 2009, 04:56:09 pm
Guys, ignore LC3

He is obviously trolling.

Nobody knows that they lost zero marks after the exam, nobody.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: YT_17 on November 05, 2009, 04:58:33 pm
WOW....u got 50 last year......that is so good
Guys, ignore LC3

He is obviously trolling.

Nobody knows that they lost zero marks after the exam, nobody.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nikinoo on November 05, 2009, 05:35:35 pm
oh wow =|
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: mtwtfss on November 05, 2009, 05:37:28 pm
Guys, ignore LC3

He is obviously trolling.

Nobody knows that they lost zero marks after the exam, nobody.

Jamison you're obviously not at school anymore
get off this forum and get a life

go play with balls with ya stick
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: mtwtfss on November 05, 2009, 05:37:58 pm



and what school do you go to? cause i doubt its any good
[/quote]
It's the best.

kinda...
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Noblesse on November 05, 2009, 05:48:51 pm
Guys, ignore LC3

He is obviously trolling.

Nobody knows that they lost zero marks after the exam, nobody.

Jamison you're obviously not at school anymore
get off this forum and get a life

Oh no, my life is crashing down around me.

Curse you internet, curse you!
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: sdhains on November 05, 2009, 06:00:43 pm
Can anyone confirm if Gearing ratio is or isn't a key indicator that could be used when assessing business liquidity?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nikinoo on November 05, 2009, 06:03:48 pm
i said gearing.. but im not sure if it's right.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 06:44:19 pm
LC3, you are so rude and uncouth - we are NOT uneducated pigs, just students who really care about their grades. How dare you insult us?

I am sure that it is the over confident people like you who do not appreciate the complexities of exams. Trust me, I did tonnes of practice exams, have rank 1 in a very, very good school and yet I appreciate the tricky parts of the exam.

So get rid of your ego and arrogance and be a bit nicer.

Ilovemathmeth, look at your predicted scores for this year
by posting them you are the arrogant pig
you did lots of practice exams cause you have no life
and what school do you go to? cause i doubt its any good

ahahahahaha thats hilarious!! mac.rob isn't good enough for prince chris?

i'll have a better life than you in the future!! you can have all the life you want now! =P

hmmm no they are just my ambitions. how are they are arrogant? i got good enough last year. maybe im just hopeful.

i think you're a jealous, immature person and vcenotes is much better without you!
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 06:45:49 pm
i also said something that the only reason WCR improved is that the business hasa  large amount of stock and debtors on hand, its not selling stock/collecting cash from debtors well. its not improving etc etc
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 06:46:25 pm
yep the rote learning clearly got me the 49 in methods, A+ on chem exam and A+ on acc exam. Clearly guys, that's rote. and of course, with zero effort.

in case you dont know, LC3, vcaa doesn't really believe in rote. Shame you employ it in your study endeavours, it wont benefit you. You need to understand things. I can see you lack ability in that area, you clearly cannot understand that you need to be nice to others in order to gain some respect on this forum.

get a life, LC3. We dont care if you messed up on Accounting, dont shove your frustrations on others and be offensive.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 06:48:03 pm
and people indicate their past scores not to be arrogant but to possibly be of help to other people on this forum. people like to help each other here, not make offensive, irrelevant comments about other members.

thanks.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: tg_luong on November 05, 2009, 06:59:05 pm
I don't understand how people can get 50's. lol.

its insane! good work though :P

For the price of the basketballs, was it $20 yeah? or $18? because i wrote $20 each but my teacher after said it was $18. Can anyone give me a DEFINITE answer that is 100% guaranteed?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 05, 2009, 07:04:13 pm
i wrote $20 because i included both the labelling of the balls as well as the freight. i think it should be ok.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 07:07:34 pm
i put down $20 as well.

inv price 15
freight 2
logo 3
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: ben4386 on November 05, 2009, 07:12:05 pm
wd guys on completing accounting, for those going to monash, i guarantee you will get at least a D for introductory accounting and finance, all entries are recorded in the general journal, you dont learn special journals til sem 2 lol
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 07:27:07 pm
wd guys on completing accounting, for those going to monash, i guarantee you will get at least a D for introductory accounting and finance, all entries are recorded in the general journal, you dont learn special journals til sem 2 lol
lol what's that suppose to mean?introductory accounting is hard coz u learn special journals at semester 2?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: sdhains on November 05, 2009, 07:47:34 pm
wd guys on completing accounting, for those going to monash, i guarantee you will get at least a D for introductory accounting and finance, all entries are recorded in the general journal, you dont learn special journals til sem 2 lol
lol what's that suppose to mean?introductory accounting is hard coz u learn special journals at semester 2?
D is for Distinction
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: ben4386 on November 05, 2009, 07:51:21 pm
the introductory accounting is a joke for ppl who have done accounting, D is for distinction, you will find it piss easy, its a shame they used to have a unit that required accounting 3/4 as a pre req
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 05, 2009, 08:23:10 pm
what was net profit and net cash from operating?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: geeza23 on November 05, 2009, 10:35:18 pm
oh haha pardon me i thought its ranked A B C D E my bad
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: victorrrX on November 06, 2009, 11:37:04 am
1.1.2 - was it $12375 accum depn? and $3625 loss?

2.3.2 - what was actual and budgeted rent revenue? i had $24.8k and $24k


It said "Rent (revenue) was increased from $2000 per month to $2200 per month commening with the August payment due on 31 August".
This means Rent Revenue earned for the month of August was $2200.
Therefore, Rent Revenue earned:
31 August - $2200
30 September - $2200
31 October - $2200
30 November - $2200
31 December - $2200
= $11000

$11000 + ($2000 x 7 months prior)
= $25000
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 06, 2009, 11:50:23 am
I got that too! =)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Fyrefly on November 06, 2009, 02:14:57 pm
the introductory accounting is a joke for ppl who have done accounting, D is for distinction, you will find it piss easy, its a shame they used to have a unit that required accounting 3/4 as a pre req

Mmm... this unit was mostly revision for me.

People who have done accounting, I would suggest you take this unit in a semester where you're also taking a couple of harder units... they'll balance each other out.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: mkpham on November 08, 2009, 06:25:49 pm
were the posters a product or period cost?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 08, 2009, 06:37:31 pm
i put it as a period cost
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: maine on November 08, 2009, 09:20:35 pm
Period, as they were not advertising for JUST the stock which had been damaged, it was just general advertiseing
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: rhjc.1991 on November 08, 2009, 09:40:17 pm
LC3 and chris.stafford are f***kers, had similar sort of trolls in my time ... bet you they get below 30

Don't worry Jamison, you make an awesome addition to vcenotes, keep up your good contributions.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: rhjc.1991 on November 08, 2009, 09:41:15 pm
also, I wouldn't say 45+ predictions are arrogant IF you have worked up to it
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 09, 2009, 12:21:01 am
I don't predict; I obsess and I only hope =)
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: spizaa #5 on November 11, 2009, 09:21:04 pm
ilovemathsmeth - he goes to a school much better than yours. please note that a school isnt measured by their vce results, but the admirable qualities the individuals possess upon leaving the school (our vce results are up there but not as good as yours due to your selection process)
schools like yours produce socially retarded braggarts (just look at your predicted scores) who pride themselves on elitism and churning out as many facts as they can remember just to beat the competition and if they drop a mark, they lose the plot because they know their parents will crack the ninetails on their back.

rlobo and mtwtfss - come here and say it. real heroes over the internet on a vce forum :| gonna get you far...
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 11, 2009, 09:35:14 pm
I don't tolerate insults towards my school. If you've got a problem with my school, keep it to yourself. My school is better than yours, because not only does it produce really good results but it has the most caring, wonderful students I know - people who are not like you. I must ask you, what admirable qualities you think you have, insulting my school for no apparent reason and sticking up for trolls or losers.

My school does NOT produce "socially retarded braggarts". You've just given me a lecture on how your school has such admirable qualities - does making offensive remarks about other schools come under these qualities? 

Are you blind? They're not PREDICTED scores, they're WHAT I WANT TO GET. Can't you read?? It says "hopeful scores". Not "predicted". Someone who predicts their scores must be very confident or very arrogant.

How DARE you insult our families? My school consists of a group of mature, self-motivated, hard working students. Unlike yours, who need to have their parents push them for every single SAC and grade. I think pushy parents must be very stressful. I'm quite sorry for you.

Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: laineytheman on November 11, 2009, 09:38:11 pm
so I think I got 82/90 hopefully. 40 is achievable?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: nbalakers24 on November 11, 2009, 09:54:40 pm
yeah man
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: spizaa #5 on November 11, 2009, 10:01:49 pm
haha your school is the best?  
im self motivated like all the boys at my school, but at the end of the day it is YOUR parents that whip you if you drop marks. not mine
your school WREAKS of arrogance just quietly.
and it is these admirable qualities that my school instils in me that make me nautious when i hear about your school and kids like you talking about vce - who cares if you dropped 3 marks and cant get a 50 have a fucking cry. there are more important things to life other than vce - you make it sound as if its a matter of life and death.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: laineytheman on November 11, 2009, 10:09:30 pm
^tbh I agree there. I get annoyed when people say 'I dropped 3 marks, kill me' or 'I wont get 50 now'.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: silva on November 11, 2009, 10:20:56 pm
haha your school is the best? 
im self motivated like all the boys at my school, but at the end of the day it is YOUR parents that whip you if you drop marks. not mine
your school WREAKS of arrogance just quietly.
and it is these admirable qualities that my school instils in me that make me nautious when i hear about your school and kids like you talking about vce - who cares if you dropped 3 marks and cant get a 50 have a fucking cry. there are more important things to life other than vce - you make it sound as if its a matter of life and death.
a-fucking-men
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: excal on November 11, 2009, 11:01:10 pm
ENOUGH

I do NOT want to sin-bin anyone during the exam period, but I will NOT hesitate if this continues. Consider yourselves warned.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 11, 2009, 11:31:54 pm
spizza#5

- you spelt 'nauseous' wrong as 'nautious'.

- Most parents don't actually care what their children get so long as they know that they have done their best. I'm sorry that your parents whip you, as you obviously seem to have got such ideas from your own experiences.

- 'Admirable' - my foot.

- Your vocabulary is absolutely appalling, it shows how much of a loser you are - you don't need to use such language, especially on an educational forum. You don't belong here.

- LOL I'm gonna laugh at you the day you complain about an awesome mark. What a hypocrite...

- LOL, everything's more important than VCE...you wouldn't be on this forum if you really thought that =P HYPOCRITE.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: spizaa #5 on November 12, 2009, 12:08:44 am
- im never going to complain about an awesome mark
- i dont care how i spelt nauseous, you understand what i meant (once again, the arrogance of your school/assumed superiority)
- my vocab is far from appalling. i use one profanity and you make a generalisation (assumed superiority again)
- i have as much of a right to learn and access educational resources as you do, so dont say i dont belong here just because your a respected member and spend your saturday nites/non-studying time on here.
- vce isnt the be all and end all. im not saying that i dont want to do well, but what im saying is that i want to maximise my opportunities for success by obtaining some valuable pieces of info off sites such as this.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: ninwa on November 12, 2009, 12:44:53 am
spizaa: careful, your inferiority complex is showing through your comments about schools producing "socially-retarded braggarts" just because they do better in VCE than your school. Not everyone's ideas of "awesome mark" has to match up to your own. Something about that word beginning with d and ending with iversity?
 
You laugh at people for getting overly upset over losing minimal marks. Yet you are getting all worked up about a bunch of strangers on a VCE forum who have high expectations. Hypocrisy much?

And by the way, trying to insult people by insinuating that they have nothing better to do on Saturday nights than spend their time on VN kind of loses its effect if you are directing said insults on said site. :)

How DARE you insult our families? My school consists of a group of mature, self-motivated, hard working students. Unlike yours, who need to have their parents push them for every single SAC and grade. I think pushy parents must be very stressful. I'm quite sorry for you.

You make valid points, but don't be a hypocrite okay? :)

sorry for feeding the troll, I'm cranky tonight >_>
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: maine on November 12, 2009, 02:02:25 pm
And all of this relates to the unit 4 accounting exam how?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Fyrefly on November 12, 2009, 05:29:29 pm
And all of this relates to the unit 4 accounting exam how?

It does not.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 13, 2009, 11:58:57 pm
It's been 'shitting you' - nice to know, I didn't know parasites like you could experience normal bodily functions =P

Haha not really a clown, I think I'd get a better job than that...

You on the other hand seem fascinated by the world of 'shitting' - maybe you're looking at a cleaner role? Aww.

My "juvenile rants" have not been directed towards you, so frankly I think you should mind your own business. I wouldn't describe myself as "socially inept" thank you very much, I've got plenty of loyal friends and that makes me VERY social =). I also wouldn't describe myself as "stupid" particularly, because a) I do VCE and b) I do it at a good school and c) I got good scores from last year.

Clearly you're the one who is stupid =D
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: excal on November 14, 2009, 01:09:44 am
Goodbye, polskafc.

Nothing of value was lost.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Fyrefly on November 14, 2009, 04:04:31 pm

I<3MM... plz stop feeding the trolls... don't bite, you're better than that.
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 14, 2009, 09:35:28 pm
LOL =P I didn't know I was egging them on further!
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Fyrefly on November 15, 2009, 01:35:45 am
LOL =P I didn't know I was egging them on further!

Did you like the way I spiffy-fied your name?
Very cool, no?
Title: Re: the accounting 09 discussion thread
Post by: Ilovemathsmeth on November 15, 2009, 06:25:04 pm
Very! =D Looks cooler than the way I spelt it! =)