ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: Hielly on November 28, 2009, 11:46:47 pm
-
Need help on 11(d)(f)
(http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s89/helenn--/math-2.jpg)
thanks
-
Best way is to sketch the graph and find the x values.
For d) you should get
or 
for f) try this:


again sketch graph.
-
Best way is to sketch the graph and find the x values.
For d) you should get
or 
for f) try this:


again sketch graph.
so i did (3x-2)(x+1) greater than 0
so x=2/3 and x=-1
how do you know if its greater or less than? you can tell by drawing a graph and looking at it right?
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
-
Best way is to sketch the graph and find the x values.
For d) you should get
or 
for f) try this:


again sketch graph.
so i did (3x-2)(x+1) greater than 0
so x=2/3 and x=-1
how do you know if its greater or less than? you can tell by drawing a graph and looking at it right?
I assume you are talking about d)
If so yes it is just the x intercepts. Then you must find the values of x for which the graph is strictly larger than 0. This is easily seen from the graph.
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
Interesting, thanks!
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
This may be stupid, but from the two solutions for x, how do you pick out the general solution?
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
This may be stupid, but from the two solutions for x, how do you pick out the general solution?
ill take a guess :) since with case 1 the signs being used at the start are 'greater than' zero then you pick the answer that is greater than zero and for case 2 since the sign at the start being used is the 'less than' zero sign then you pick the answer that is less than zero
Edit: remember that i may be completely wrong tho!
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
This may be stupid, but from the two solutions for x, how do you pick out the general solution?
ill take a guess :) since with case 1 the signs being used at the start are 'greater than' zero then you pick the answer that is greater than zero and for case 2 since the sign at the start being used is the 'less than' zero sign then you pick the answer that is less than zero
Edit: remember that i may be completely wrong tho!
haha, I'll trust that you're correct. Thanks for the help!
-
I always found it easier to graph the function. For part (f), I'd draw in the line y = -2. I'd find where the function equals -2. Then judging from the graph, you can decide where the function is greater than -2 and less than -2.
Same applies for f(x) > 0, find where it equals zero then from the graph you can easily tell where it is greater.
How do I write in that maths font? I really like it!
-
How do I write in that maths font? I really like it!
You'll need to learn LaTex. It's like BB coding but google "LaTex" and you'll find some good resources.
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
This may be stupid, but from the two solutions for x, how do you pick out the general solution?
For case 1, anything larger than 2/3 is larger than -1. so x>2/3 is more general
For case 2, apply same logic.
-
A more algebraic way (albeit longer!) would be this:
for d)
(3x-2) > 0)
Case 1:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Case 2:
and 
and 
The 'general' solution here is 
Combine the 2 cases and you get
or 
Notice the use of "and" and "or" when splitting cases, it is crucial that you don't get mixed up with these 2 important words.
This may be stupid, but from the two solutions for x, how do you pick out the general solution?
ill take a guess :) since with case 1 the signs being used at the start are 'greater than' zero then you pick the answer that is greater than zero and for case 2 since the sign at the start being used is the 'less than' zero sign then you pick the answer that is less than zero
Edit: remember that i may be completely wrong tho!
Close guess but no cigar :P
What if we had (x+1)(3x-2) < 0
Case 1
x+1<0 and 3x-2>0
x<-1 and x > 2/3
Here there is NO general solution. (So you wouldn't pick the x<-1)
Case 2
x+1>0 and 3x-2<0
x>-1 and x<2/3
Now this case has the actual solution: -1<x<2/3
:)
This algebraic method is simply just to stimulate further thinking, graphing is the easiest way to go.
-
^ oh.. thanks for the correction :)