ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Specialist Mathematics => Topic started by: superflya on January 02, 2010, 10:12:53 pm
-

Mod Edit: Fixed up incorrect LaTeX
-
Recognition...
-
If inspection fails.
Let 
Then how do you integrate
(long divide)
-
thanks gerry
getting stumped at the after the long division part TT :S
-

The antiderivative of
is
-
legend :)
-

express
in terms of n
hence, show 
Mod Edit: Merged triple post into one.
-

express
in terms of n
hence, show 
Mod Edit: Merged triple post into one.
+\tan^{n-2}(x)\,dx)
(1+\tan^2(x))\,dx)
\sec^2(x)\,dx)
Let \Rightarrow \frac{du}{dx} = \sec^2(x))
})
 du=\int_0^1 u^{n-2}du)

Hopefully I didn't make any mistakes, stupid computer keeps on freezing for like 10-15 seconds each min or so.
-
thats right ;)
ur too quick for it TT :P
-
cool, do you still need help on the U_6, i think it should be fairly straightforward if you understood how to do the other part :)
-
i got the answer but cood u show me ur workings, i probs used triple the amount of necessary steps :P
the essentials explanations are really getting to me, they show u s***t all

u use the double angle formulae for that right? i can do it using the books jibbed methods but how wood u do it?
:)
-
 dx = \int \left(-\frac{1}{2}\left(\cos(2x)-1\right)\right)^2 dx)
Is that how you did it? I also used double angle formula, it is the only spesh method.
Or you can use complex numbers... but that's outside the spesh course.
won't work for this one
-
yea i ended up with that integration but took a while.
wanted to finish the 2 chapters on antidifferentiation and its apps in 2 days but doesnt look lyk happening :P
-
yea i ended up with that integration but took a while.
wanted to finish the 2 chapters on antidifferentiation and its apps in 2 days but doesnt look lyk happening :P
Yeah it sure does, but it is right :) Good work!
-
partial fractions look so tempting in the next exercise but ceebs finishing this lol.
-
partial fractions look so tempting in the next exercise but ceebs finishing this lol.
Gogo the night is still young my friend!!!!!!
-
haha my sleeping patterns are effed so here we go
-
yea i ended up with that integration but took a while.
wanted to finish the 2 chapters on antidifferentiation and its apps in 2 days but doesnt look lyk happening :P
IMO that is the funnest part of Spesh since I had never seen it before I touched the Spesh book.
-
true it is pretty fun but some questions require a hell of a lot of work
-
how wood i integrate cosec^2(x-pi/2) dx
didnt know the code for cosec on latex :P
-
Make a substitution then use
-
how wood i integrate cosec^2(x-pi/2) dx
didnt know the code for cosec on latex :P
 dx = \int \sec^2\left(x) dx = \tan(x))
Make a substitution then use 
/0's way is also good, it is good to remember that 'rule' however try to manipulate your expressions into ones you already know.
-
i feel lyk an idiot :P
thanks guys
-
Ah yeah TT's way is better it's more simplified
-
-
Then substitute
-
ahh got it :) thanks
-

why dont i ever get a substitution that works?
-

Try now?
-
lifesaver :)
btw howd u break it down to that, ive tried n failed :P
-
lifesaver :)
btw howd u break it down to that, ive tried n failed :P
Long division.
Let
-
got it. thanks ;)
-
why cant i do this >.<

sin inverse?
-
In general if you see anything of the form
, try the substitution
, 
Let
with
, then 
)



+C)
+C)

With
try
, 
With
try
,  \cup [\pi, \frac{3\pi}{2}))
-
That's a perfectly reasonable approach, another approach would be noticing that the x in the numerator is the derivative of x^2 upto a constant, which suggests the substitution u = x^2.
-
why cant i do this >.<

sin inverse?
x is on top of the fraction so it can not be sin inverse.
Let 
so 
so
-
That's a perfectly reasonable approach, another approach would be noticing that the x in the numerator is the derivative of x^2 upto a constant, which suggests the substitution u = x^2.
ah, of course! thanks ahmad
*facepalm*
-
That's a perfectly reasonable approach, another approach would be noticing that the x in the numerator is the derivative of x^2 upto a constant, which suggests the substitution u = x^2.
ah, of course!
*facepalm*
Too much 'Stewart Calculus' would be to blame. ;D
-
That's a perfectly reasonable approach, another approach would be noticing that the x in the numerator is the derivative of x^2 upto a constant, which suggests the substitution u = x^2.
ah, of course!
*facepalm*
Too much 'Stewart Calculus' would be to blame. ;D
Lol yes, now I'm a mindless integrating drone XD
-
In general if you see anything of the form
, try the substitution 
This is a quality suggestion, certainly something to look for. It's good to do integrals in many different ways, gives you an idea of what works and why. :)
-
thanks guys :)
-
differentiate
\cos ^{n-1}(x))
hence verify that
-
=sin(x ) *\frac{d}{dx} (cos^{n-1}(x))+cos^{n-1}(x ) * \frac{d}{dx}(sin (x)))
let u=cosx
=sin(x ) *\frac{d}{dx} (u^{n-1})+cos^{n-1}(x ) * \frac{d}{dx}(sin (x)))
 *\frac{du}{dx}*\frac{d}{du} (u^{n-1})+cos^{n-1}(x ) * \frac{d}{dx}(sin (x)))
 * (n-1) (cos(x))^{n-2} + cos^n x)
-1)*(n-1) (cos(x))^{n-2} + cos^n x)
cos^n(x) + (1-n)(cos^{n-2} (x)))
=ncos^n(x) + (1-n)(cos^{n-2} (x)))
=f'(x ) + (n-1)cos^{n-2} (x))
and now antidifferentiate both sides :)
-
I suggest you reading: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,7092.0.html. May help a bit.
-
sweet ;D
-
Hmmm...I've got some questions:
1. Why does 'Trinon's Guide to Anti-Derivatives through Derivatives' have:
We first multiply this equation by
so that we get
.
2. kamil, can you show the workings from
to your first equation?
Thanks. :)
-
 dx )
\right) = \log_e(x) + 1)
See any connections?
-
Anymore clues? lol :p
-
-
Ooh! I see..:) Thanks TrueTears.
-
last 6 or so questions of the final exercise of the integration chapter are a bi-tch :P
-
2. kamil, can you show the workings from
to your first equation?
Thanks. :)
product rule.
-
2. kamil, can you show the workings from
to your first equation?
Thanks. :)
product rule.
pretty obvious :P
-
Oh right. Imma bit slow today.. ::)
-
superflya, what textbook are you using?
-
superflya, what textbook are you using?
Essentials.
Yeah I answered for him :)
-
superflya, what textbook are you using?
Essentials.
Yeah I answered for him :)
yep ;)
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
all this time i assumed u finished skool brightsky. lol
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
all this time i assumed u finished skool brightsky. lol
all this time i assumed u finished skool superflya. lol
-
lolz! :D
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
all this time i assumed u finished skool brightsky. lol
all this time i assumed u finished skool superflya. lol
:O. beats me TT :P
-
lolz! :D
im still confused...are u in yr 12 this year??
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
all this time i assumed u finished skool brightsky. lol
all this time i assumed u finished skool superflya. lol
:O. beats me TT :P
im still confused...are u in yr 12 this year??
lol this is ridiculous :P
-
Lol, I have that book too. :)
hahaha, unfortunately.
all this time i assumed u finished skool brightsky. lol
all this time i assumed u finished skool superflya. lol
:O. beats me TT :P
im still confused...are u in yr 12 this year??
lol this is ridiculous :P
haha unfortunately :P
-
if the books answer is wrong with this one ill be so annoyed.
sketch and evaluate the following integral:

i got
-
if the books answer is wrong with this one ill be so annoyed.
sketch and evaluate the following integral:

i got 
Let )
 dy\right] - \left[ \left(1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{6}\right) -\left |\int_{-\frac{\pi}{6}}^0 2\sin(y) dy \right | \right] = \frac{5\pi}{6} - \sqrt{3})
That required a lot of integrating along the
axis and sketching.
I guess an easier way is to do:
 = \sin^{-1}\frac{x}{2} + \frac{x}{\sqrt{4-x^2}})
Then integrate both sides and find the integral of 
-
>.< thanks TT .
-
nps, I see how you got your answer.
heh you did everything right, except at the end you added the area's together, however the question didn't ask for the area :P
It wanted the signed area haha
Since from -1 to 0 sin^-1 is negative, you gotta subtract it to find the signed area.
-
lol im a douce.
thanks again :)
-
Prove that if the diagonals of a parallelogram are of equal length then the parallelogram is a rectangle.
Argh, vector proofs! I'm a bit lost with how to start this one.
-
Hint:
-
Lol shoodve named it superflyas most awesome question thread :P
-
Prove that if the diagonals of a parallelogram are of equal length then the parallelogram is a rectangle.
Argh, vector proofs! I'm a bit lost with how to start this one.
Probs not the right way to do it, but....
Suppose you have a parallelogram
where the diagonals
.
Consider the triangles
and
:
Remember that opposite sides of a parallelogram are parallel.
(common),
(alternate angles are equal),
(alternate angles are equal) .
(ASA)
So
(corresponding sides of congruent triangles are equal)
Consider the triangles
and
.
(common),
(given)
(SSS)
So
(corresponding angles of congruent triangles are equal [/tex]
However,
(co-interior angles are supplementary)
Substitute
into the equation.


Substitute back into
.

Because co-interior angles are supplementary, that means
and
are both equal to
.
As the definition of a rectangle is a parallelogram with four interior right angles,
Hence if the diagonals of a parallelogram are equal, then the parallelogram is a rectangle.
-
Just to illustrate how vectors can trivialise geometry:
let
and
be two adjacent sides of the parralogram.
We have that


.(a+b)=(a-b).(a-b))



Thus
and
are perpendicular as required.
-
Just to illustrate how vectors can trivialise geometry:
let
and
be two adjacent sides of the parralogram.
We have that


.(a+b)=(a-b).(a-b))



Thus
and
are perpendicular as required.
lol, nice, I remember you showing me this longggg time ago :P
-
Thank you brightsky and kamil! :)
-
lol, nice, I remember you showing me this longggg time ago :P
lol serious, i can't remember ever doing this. I had to think a bit this time around.
-
^^ being a tad modest :P
-
Lol I didn't mean a bit literally :P
-
LOL ;D
-
find area enclosed by
&
& 
im not sure as to the order of equations that i have to subtract, its usually top part of area minus bottom but now theres right left and bottom?
Edit: got it -.-
-
find the point P on the line
such that
is parallel to the vector
-
What I did was:
Let P = (x,y) where x,y are a point on the line.
= (x,y) - (0,0) = (x,y)
. (3,1) = 1
 . (3,1) = 1 \rightarrow 3x + y = 1)
Now  + y = 1)


-
book says
:S
-
Assuming
is the x-ordinate of our point...
, now we get the gradient of that point and make it equal
because that is the gradient of the vector (worded wrong I assume, but that's what I was thinking heh)

Sub that back in
-
book says
:S
I found a much simpler way to solve it and don't listen to my method above.
The solution is easy.
First let's draw a line through the point (3,1) which is
and let's find where
intersects
. Why? Well because the point could always make the vector anti-parallel to (3,1).
So
&
So P = (-11,
)
-
-.- all the working and the solution was that straightforward \facepalms
legend quantum :)
-
the number of real solutions for
is?
-
the number of real solutions for
is?
-\cot ^{2}(x))
(since
)
graphs the curves
on calc and see how many intersections there are
-
thanks so much :)
-
the number of real solutions for
is?
-\cot ^{2}(x))
(since
)
graphs the curves
on calc and see how many intersections there are
well if ur gonna use the calc, you might as well use the solve function straight away and see how many ansewrs pop up (easier).
or u can do it in ur head by picturing y=x^4-x^3 = x^3(x-1) (quartic graphs look like a parabola and it passes 0 and 1) so when you draw a line y=1 , you can tell that it must cut 2 of the 'parabola arms'
-
yea just had a mindblank :P tiredness isnt helping.
-
}\ dx)
ishghwpao;hg;poahwhgw wtfffff?
-
}\ dx)
ishghwpao;hg;poahwhgw wtfffff?
I doubt we'd be asked to evaluate that.
Unless it asks for the definite integral, which you can do on the calculator.
-
Let
, then }{2 \sqrt{\tan(x)}} dx )
In terms of
, this is:

Hence,

Substitute that back in:
} dx = \int \frac{2u^2}{u^4 + 1} du )
Decompose it using partial fractions, should be a tad easier now.
-
this isnt a spesh question, found it and it looked interesting :P
gahh ive almost given up. ill try that brightsky ;)