ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: kenhung123 on March 13, 2010, 06:15:15 pm
-
=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2}}=\frac{1}{x} )
As 
-
unless restrictions are applied.
-
But I thought the root of x^2 is the positive only?
-
i think its simplifyable .... i think u should try it on the CAS calculator to see if it simplifys for you or type that equation as equalling the one u think it would and if it says true then it is ..if it says false well then its false >< i ope u get what i mean
-
As 
>.< you would have lost tons of marks on last year's Methods exams if you did that
-
^ ???
-
huh
thered be two cases wouldnt there?
-
As 
>.< you would have lost tons of marks on last year's Methods exams if you did that
true!
modulus x does not just equal x :)
-
But I thought the root of x^2 is the positive only?
u sure?
-
According to heinemann..
-
Also I'd like to put this question out there (where is the fallacy?)
^2} = +\sqrt{9} = +3)
But
^2} = + (-3^2)^{\frac{1}{2}} = + (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3)
Thus 
[Think about multivalued roots!]
-
i think it it's saying when only applied to certain situations in applications .. such that you can't have a neg answer...
-
Oh and I forgot to say the fallacy is beyond methods, don't worry if you can't understand why, it is not very important in VCE maths :P
-
i think it it's saying when only applied to certain situations in applications .. such that you can't have a neg answer...
But....how do they expect us to assume that...
-
Yeah,

BUT you can have
-
^ ???
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/mathematics/methods/assessreports/2009/mm2_assessrep_09.pdf
Methods 2009 Exam 2 Assessor's report
Question 1 e i.)
Many students showed a poor understanding of the absolute value function and incorrectly simplified √(x2) to x.
-
I don't know man, that's what the textbook says
-
Yeah, make sure you can tell the difference between
AND
-
The text looks like the first one..
-
The text looks like the first one..
so u cant simplify it to
-
It says it =x not +/-x
-
What, it says
?
Well then it's wrong :)
-
Didn't you see the attachment?
-
books are written by humans
humans are not perfect
but practise makes perfect
but nobody is perfect
so why practise?
-
wow...pro~~~
i liked that~~~
0 motivation now..
no pressure ~~ !!
haha
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3,
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
^2} = (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3... = x...)
there was this sorta question on last years exam 1 and 2 i think...no wonder i stuffed up exam 1 XD
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
^2} = (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3... = x...)
Erm ... isn't it
(because of +ve square root?)
-
the reason in methods
is because the square roots are multivalued, thus the modulus get's rid of this misconception. You will learn more about it in uni.
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
^2} = (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3... = x...)
Erm ... isn't it
(because of +ve square root?)
not rly...
where would the fallacy be in my step then?
-
the reason in methods
is because the square roots are multivalued, thus the modulus get's rid of this misconception. You will learn more about it in uni.
we learn this in uni maths?...i dont look foward to it...:(
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
^2} = (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3... = x...)
Erm ... isn't it
(because of +ve square root?)
not rly...
where would the fallacy be in my step then?
No idea >.<
-
there isn't and both are right :)
-
THIS IS A FAIL TEXTBOOK FOR YOUR INFORMATION!!! :D
If x=-3, ^2} = 3 = -x)
no...
^2} = (-3)^{\frac{2}{2}} = -3... = x...)
Erm ... isn't it
(because of +ve square root?)
not rly...
where would the fallacy be in my step then?
Maybe need to follow BEDMAS
-
ok.
-
there isn't and both are right :)
LOL :D
Call it a draw this time ;)
(actually, is it ok to skip from
to
?
it should be right, but that seems to be where we diverge :P)
-
i didn't skip anything
-
isn't
defined as the positive root?
-
isn't
defined as the positive root?
Yeah, so the answer should be positive...
Oh whatever! :P
-
isn't
defined as the positive root?
definitions?
-
isn't
defined as the positive root?
definitions?
"Every non-negative real number x has a unique non-negative square root,
called the principal square root, which is denoted with a radical sign as
"
- Wikipedia
-
i wonder what kamil would say about this
-
quite frankly I don't really care. I'm more worried about the pedantic and elitist image of 'uni maths' that has probably scared future generations and may possibly cause loss of some great talent.
we learn this in uni maths?...i dont look foward to it... :(
-
I agree with /0, the case that
is not because the square roots are multivalued. If that was the case, it would be expressed as
[see how it's multivalued?] HOWEVER, this is not true.
The square root function is defined as the positive branch, the fact that it returns the absolute value is because
is not one-to-one, and whenever a negative value is substituted, a positive value is returned (hence, absolute).
But I thought the root of x^2 is the positive only?
^^ that statement is correct, hence you cannot say
, because this means the root could be negative (for
)
-
I agree with /0, the case that
is not because the square roots are multivalued. If that was the case, it would be expressed as
[see how it's multivalued?] HOWEVER, this is not true.
The square root function is defined as the positive branch, the fact that it returns the absolute value is because
is not one-to-one, and whenever a negative value is substituted, a positive value is returned (hence, absolute).
But I thought the root of x^2 is the positive only?
^^ that statement is correct, hence you cannot say
, because this means the root could be negative (for
)
YES thank you for confirmation :)
-
quite frankly I don't really care. I'm more worried about the pedantic and elitist image of 'uni maths' that has probably scared future generations and may possibly cause loss of some great talent.
we learn this in uni maths?...i dont look foward to it... :(
exactly, definitions are just definitions.