ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Science => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Chemistry => Topic started by: crayolé on September 20, 2010, 05:42:00 pm
-
Alright, it's that time of year again ;]
So before i start going kenhung ( :smitten: )on your asses by spamming up this board with individual question threads I thought I might stick it all in here for everyones convenience ;]
Much appreciation and many karmas coming your way
First up
How would one go about finding the enthalpy change of H1?
-
Hi, hopefully you have the answers, but what i would probably do (someone correct me if i'm wrong/let me know if this is right with answers) is considering you are forming C + 4H, and atomisation of Hydrogen is H2--> 2H, is times that figure by 2 = 717*2, and then add the atomisation of carbon because there is only 1, and thennn since you are breaking down methane add that too, to get 1726kj/mol
And the rule of thumb is if bonds break it is endothermic, and so it would be =+1726kj/mol
-
Cheers ;]
Okay, For this question, i have all the concentrations and stuff right its just my equilibrium constant equation that I can't get right.
So in this closed system, the products are [Cl2] and [CO] right? So they should be the numerator with the [CoCl2] being the denominator.
The answers do it the other way around though?
Also, would the reduction reaction during the corrosion of Fe(s) use the
O2 +4H+ +4e- ----> 2H2O
or
O2 +2H2O +4e- ----> 4OH-
-
Cheers ;]
Okay, For this question, i have all the concentrations and stuff right its just my equilibrium constant equation that I can't get right.
So in this closed system, the products are [Cl2] and [CO] right? So they should be the numerator with the [CoCl2] being the denominator.
The answers do it the other way around though?
Also, would the reduction reaction during the corrosion of Fe(s) use the
O2 +4H+ +4e- ----> 2H2O
or
O2 +2H2O +4e- ----> 4OH-
The equilibrium constant should be derived from the given reaction. The question does say that phosgene gas is the product of the reaction:

The reduction reaction would be
since oxygen gas and water is required for corrosion, to provide the electrons.
-
Cheers guys, heres a couple more to bug you about.
Just got semi-fucked over with NEAP 09, need these questions answered ;3
Okay, so for the first one.
For the cathode reaction, is O2 + 4H+ + 4e- -----> 2H2O correct also?
Second one, Can someone please run through the method on how to derive individual half reactions from a full one?
Cheers
-
For the cathode reaction, is O2 + 4H+ + 4e- -----> 2H2O correct also?
No, that isn't right.
Where is the source of H+? You have to look at what reactants are available to you.
Second one, Can someone please run through the method on how to derive individual half reactions from a full one?
I usually look at the oxidation number changes in the reactants. From there, you can see if reduction/oxidation has occurred, and you can write half equations easily (just in the normal way).
So, for the anode, look for oxidation. Oxidation is an increase in oxidation number, which occurs with zinc.
-
Thanks fady ;]
For this one, there's the question and I've also included the answer
So let me get this right, if an iron electrode is used as the anode, we would see the reaction
instead.
but this reaction is beneath the
in the electrochemical series
Is it possible for an electrolytic cell to go from a non-spontaneous reaction to a spontaneous one just like that?
EDIT: thanks Studyinghard
-
If there is a power source present it doesnt matter if its a spontaneous or non spontaneous reaction it will be still classified as a electrolytic cell so you cant call it a galvanic reaction/cell.
-
According to my teacher, you balance oxygen with water for an acidic cell, then if it is an alkaline cell, you neutralize the H+ with OH-. If it is neutral, then just O2 + 4e- > 2O2-
-
According to my teacher, you balance oxygen with water for an acidic cell, then if it is an alkaline cell, you neutralize the H+ with OH-. If it is neutral, then just O2 + 4e- > 2O2-
my tutor explained a bit differently. He followed the original steps for balancing redox reactions and then told us to add OH- ions to which ever side that didnt have the OH- ions and then combine them with H+ to form water. (if there were any H+ present)
-
Cheers guys, heres a couple more to bug you about.
Just got semi-fucked over with NEAP 09, need these questions answered ;3
Okay, so for the first one.
For the cathode reaction, is O2 + 4H+ + 4e- -----> 2H2O correct also?
Second one, Can someone please run through the method on how to derive individual half reactions from a full one?
Cheers
But would that work for this question?
-
Thanks guys.
Just for clarification, can spontaneous reactions still occur in an electrolytic cell?
And theres another question that I'm stumped on, not sure if its because of the wording or what but I just can't seem to get my head around it
Water and the iron(II) ion are both able to act as either an oxidant or a reductant during a chemical reaction. Select the equation representing a reaction that would be expected to proceed substantially to the right spontaneously.
A. Fe (s) + 2 Fe3+ (aq) -----------------> 3 Fe2+ (aq)
B. 2 H2O (l) -----------------> O2 (g) + 2 H2 (g)
C. 2 H2O (l) + 2 Fe2+ (aq) -----------------> O2 (g) + 4 H+ (aq) + 2 Fe (s)
D. 2 H2O (l) + 4 Fe3+ (aq) -----------------> O2 (g) + 4 H+ (aq) + 4 Fe2+ (aq)
-
^ It's asking pretty much to refer to the electrochemical series and find a reaction between two reactants that can have a spontaneous reaction
ie: negative gradient when connecting the two reactants
look at A)
Fe(s) is a relatively strong reductant that can react with the relatively strong oxidant Fe3+(aq). They have a negative gradiant when connected, and so are spontaneous. So balance charges and check to see if that is the correct answer.
'to the right' is basically just in the forward direction so it doesn't really mean anything being there..
B-D If you look at reactions with H20, you can see that water is a weak reductant or a weak oxidant when it is on it's own (ie not with O2) and so will not be likely to react spontaneous as it will form a positive gradient with most reactants (that being it is not spontaneous), but check each of the above using the electrochemical series, balancing out charges and such to see if they are there.
Then you should get the correct answer, which though i haven't done the entire question seems to be somewhat obvious.
-
Cheers vexxyboy :smitten:
How would one go about separating this equation into two half-reactions?
 + Ag_{2}O(s) ---> ZnO(s) + 2 Ag(s))
-
Cheers vexxyboy :smitten:
How would one go about separating this equation into two half-reactions?
 + Ag_{2}O(s) ---> ZnO(s) + 2 Ag(s))
^^
Well, you can see that Zn ---> Zn0
And Ag2O ----> 2Ag
So just balance them by adding in the waters, H+ ions and electrons in the correct way.
Pretty sure that's it.
-
Thanks Vexx
For the first MC, the solutions says its C but I got D? I'm confused, in their '10 paper, they included the solids in the K value but they disregard it in this instance?
The full reaction is this
AgCl(s) + 2NH3(aq) ----> Ag(NH3)2(aq) + Cl-(aq)
For the second MC, the solutions say its A but would C also be a viable answer?
It would donate its proton to the NH3 ions thus causing a net back reaction and increasing the amount of Cl- and Ag+ thus less AgCl(s) would need be dissolved?
For the third MC - this sounds like a pretty stupid question (it probably is) but why cant it be assumed that
? Similar to how it is assumed
in acid reactions
-
would u like to add my name in the thread too :( i have a loota questions too :(
-
For the dissolution of silver chloride, technically the second equation refers to the formation of a silver-amine complex, not the dissolution of silver chloride. The mechanism is when amine is added, it removes some Ag+, thus driving the first equilibrium to the right, increasing Cl-. The solubility constant for AgCl will be maintained (Ag+ decreases and Cl- increases). The 'most' correct answer is A, though technically [AgCl] isn't a real quantity, and should be 1 and omitted from the equation.
For the second question, I don't see how A can work. An increased volume generally mean more salt can be dissolved, not an 'increase' in undissolved salt. Addition of Cl- might work for some cases, but generally when you have a low Ag+ concentration and there's little free Ag+, adding Cl- won't do much at all. (The competing equation with ammonia is quite strong, unless you add VERY concentrated NaCl, you won't really get the AgCl back.) I don't think any of the options are really correct.
For the third question, you can only assume that for weak acids because initially there's only water, no conjugate salts or H+ present. For most system however, you cannot assume the system is 'clean' initially, and there may be some products already present.
-
Cheers Mao, much appreciated ;]
Question 2
A student calibrated a solution calorimeter containing 100 mL of water using electrical apparatus. The specific heat capacity of water is 4.18 J °C-1 g-1. Assuming that the student’s measurements were reliable, which calibration factor is most likely for a well-insulated calorimeter?
A. 240 J K-1
B. 480 J K-1
C. 960 J K-1
D. 1418 J K-1
Also, are we supposed to learn fusion/fission reaction formulas and derive it's properties? (refer to attachment)
-
You would assume the calibration factor to be a tiny bit bigger than the amount of energy required to heat all the water by 1 degree, considering the calorimeter works by the water absorbing heat. Thus B.
As for fusion/fission, yeah, you are meant to know how to balance those equations. You are also meant to know fusion is exothermic up until Fe, and is endothermic after that. Fission is endothermic up until Fe, and is exothermic after that.