ATAR Notes: Forum
Archived Discussion => 2010 => End-of-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: meefz on November 08, 2010, 04:23:16 pm
-
Aiiitteeee so its all over.
Nways what do u reckon ill get with:
Exam 1: 34-36
Exam 2: 65-69
SACS: 92% average part of a pretty strong cohort
-
Similar situation for me...
-
WTF are you me?
That's exactly what I'm predicting my scores to be and that was my SAC score for the year. ;D
Hopefully we can pull off a 40, 41?
-
I'ld say that a really high A and a low-mid A+, so bang on 40?
-
how about
rank 1 in a strong cohort
38/40 in exam 1
~75/80 in exam 2
-
Aiiitteeee so its all over.
Nways what do u reckon ill get with:
Exam 1: 34-36
Exam 2: 65-69
SACS: 92% average part of a pretty strong cohort
Depending on the difficulty of the exam I'd say ~40-41
-
Over 40 without a doubt...
-
If anyone can bothered;
SACs - 95%
Exam 1 - 39/40
Exam 2 ~ 72/80
-
how about
rank 1 in a strong cohort
38/40 in exam 1
~75/80 in exam 2
It looks like ~45-46 (depending on if your Sac marks can be bumped up with #1 rank)
-
If anyone can bothered;
SACs - 95%
Exam 1 - 39/40
Exam 2 ~ 72/80
A friend of mine achieved similar scores last year (41-42). If the state does really badly, you might be looking at ~43-44
-
what about
rank 2 in a strong cohort with a 94% sac score
40/40 in exam 1
76-78/80 in exam 2
-
If anyone can bothered;
SACs - 95%
Exam 1 - 39/40
Exam 2 ~ 72/80
A friend of mine achieved similar scores last year (41-42). If the state does really badly, you might be looking at ~43-44
OMG, that's a relief.
I did Methods last year and that was PISS EASY compared to this year, I kid you not.
-
How about this:
Sacs 90% (strong cohort)
Exam 1: 31/40 ( :-[ )
Exam 2: 72/80
-
Can someone please predict mine?
Exam 1: 28-31/40
Exam 2: 56-60/80
SACs: Rank 3 in average cohort.
-
what about
rank 2 in a strong cohort with a 94% sac score
40/40 in exam 1
76-78/80 in exam 2
Probably ~47-49. But it depends on how Mr. Rank #1 performs - he can bring down the entire Cohort's Sac marks.
-
How about
sacs average A
30/40 exam 1
30/80 exam 2
any chance of 35
-
can some 1 predict mine too?
mid A+ for sacs
36/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
-
How about this:
Sacs 90% (strong cohort)
Exam 1: 31/40 ( :-[ )
Exam 2: 72/80
To be brutally honest, you're awesome Exam 2 mark (relative to the state) probably saves you from the Exam 1 mark
I'd say ~37-39 - if the state did really badly, it might even crack 40 :)
-
Can someone please predict mine?
Exam 1: 28-31/40
Exam 2: 56-60/80
SACs: Rank 3 in average cohort.
Probably Mid thirties - I'd say ~35+
-
How about
sacs average A
30/40 exam 1
30/80 exam 2
any chance of 35
To be honest, with that exam 2 score, probably not. The mean usually hovers around 44. So maybe you could crack 30 if you're luck. Probably ~29
-
How about this:
Sacs 90% (strong cohort)
Exam 1: 31/40 ( :-[ )
Exam 2: 72/80
To be brutally honest, you're awesome Exam 2 mark (relative to the state) probably saves you from the Exam 1 mark
I'd say ~37-39 - if the state did really badly, it might even crack 40 :)
Lolol I don't see how you were being brutal there, that score makes me happy!
thanks
-
can someone help predict my scores?
89/100 sacs
34-36 exam 1
60-65 exam 2
DDD:
thankss
-
can some 1 predict mine too?
mid A+ for sacs
36/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
With those scores (especially because Exam 2 is weighted far more than Exam 1), you're probably looking at high 40s. Maybe ~47-48
-
sacs: 93%
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 65/80
thanks
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
easy 46, if not higher....
sacs wont have too detrimental an effect with your incredible exam 2 score...
-
40/40
and
72-77/80 ?
ranked about 30th (out of 300) in the strongest cohort in the state 8)
Lol. What cohort is that? MHS?
I'm not sure how you're SAC ranking would impact your score - because there are 30 students above you who could've f***ed up the exam.
But purely on those exam scores alone, I'd say ~44-45
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
easy 46, if not higher....
sacs wont have too detrimental an effect with your incredible exam 2 score...
Danny, tag team me.
-
SS as in raw or scaled?
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
Looking at around 47-48 easy
-
Exam 1 : 36/40
Exam 2 : 75ish/80
Sacs: 96%, rank 1 in a strong cohort
Would I be able to crack the 45?
-
How about this:
Sacs 90% (strong cohort)
Exam 1: 31/40 ( :-[ )
Exam 2: 72/80
To be brutally honest, you're awesome Exam 2 mark (relative to the state) probably saves you from the Exam 1 mark
I'd say ~37-39 - if the state did really badly, it might even crack 40 :)
Lolol I don't see how you were being brutal there, that score makes me happy!
thanks
brutally honest
-
SS as in raw or scaled?
Raw as in WWE RAW smackdown
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
easy 46, if not higher....
sacs wont have too detrimental an effect with your incredible exam 2 score...
Danny, tag team me.
Are the answers up yet or exam up yet? :S
-
i assume you guys are talking in terms of raw scores rather than scaled scores right??
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
-
can someone help predict my scores?
89/100 sacs
34-36 exam 1
60-65 exam 2
DDD:
thankss
~34-35
-
Exam 1 : 36/40
Exam 2 : 75ish/80
Sacs: 96%, rank 1 in a strong cohort
Would I be able to crack the 45?
the 36 could hurt, will probably be a low A+, the 75 will save you though, it'll be a mid-high A+...
45-47 is about where ur looking...
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
You will get a 50 if you got those scores.
-
can someone have a go at mine please:
Exam 1: 30/40
Exam 2: 50/80
SACs : 75/100
Ranked shit in a shit cohort
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
42-43...
-
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78-79/80
Sac is only A-A+ in a very strong cohort
I wanna get at least 42 :(
These were similar to my results last year. The SAC marks may bring you down though :(
Nevertheless, considering the difficulty of the exam, I'd say ~48
-
SS as in raw or scaled?
Raw as in WWE RAW smackdown
kewl :D
hoping to get around
Exam 2: ~65-70/80
Exam 1: 40/40
sac marks are pretty good in a relatively strong cohort
-
can someone have a go at mine please:
Exam 1: 30/40
Exam 2: 50/80
SACs : 75/100
Ranked shit in a shit cohort
low 30's....
-
Exam 1 : 36/40
Exam 2 : 75ish/80
Sacs: 96%, rank 1 in a strong cohort
Would I be able to crack the 45?
Maybe. It looks like a ~42-43
-
How about
SACS: 89% and ranked 4th in a strong cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 70/80
?
-
can someone have a go at mine please:
Exam 1: 30/40
Exam 2: 50/80
SACs : 75/100
Ranked shit in a shit cohort
~32-35
-
chavi we gotta be on par !
-
can someone have a go at mine please:
Exam 1: 30/40
Exam 2: 50/80
SACs : 75/100
Ranked shit in a shit cohort
low 30's....
thankyou thats all i want
-
How about
SACS: 89% and ranked 4th in a strong cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 70/80
?
42-43ish...
-
chavi we gotta be on par !
Dyeni. Dyeni. Oh Dyeni. Stop stop. No srsly. Dyeni!!!!
I just hit parity
-
how about
exam 1: 35~36/40
exam 2: 67~72/80
Sacs rank 2: 93%
-
How about
SACS: 89% and ranked 4th in a strong cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 70/80
?
Low forties. Maybe ~43
-
how about
exam 1: 35~36/40
exam 2: 67~72/80
Sacs rank 2: 93%
39-40...
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
-
SACS: Rank 1, 99/100
Exam 1: 35-36/40
Exam 2: 76/80
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
i reckon more like 42-43...
-
SACS: Rank 1, 99/100
Exam 1: 35-36/40
Exam 2: 76/80
45...
-
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 99/100 (number 1 but i dont know why im not 100 :S)
-
Exam : 38
Exam 2: 60
Average in strong cohort
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
i reckon more like 42-43...
Sac ranking and marks could hurt. The 10 marks off Exam 2 is a big bumber. Still sticking with ~41
It would be interesting to compare our estimations with their results on Dec 14, ey Dyeni? :)
-
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 99/100 (number 1 but i dont know why im not 100 :S)
38-39...
-
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 99/100 (number 1 but i dont know why im not 100 :S)
~37-38
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
i reckon more like 42-43...
Sac ranking and marks could hurt. The 10 marks off Exam 2 is a big bumber. Still sticking with ~41
It would be interesting to compare o
ur estimations with their results on Dec 14, ey Dyeni? :)
for sure chavi davi! im looking at 99.7.... still .25 off u :p
-
Exam : 38
Exam 2: 60
Average in strong cohort
~34-36
-
Sacs: 95% ranked top 10
Exam 1: 33-36
Exam 2: 66-72
chance at 40???
thanks heaps
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
i reckon more like 42-43...
Sac ranking and marks could hurt. The 10 marks off Exam 2 is a big bumber. Still sticking with ~41
It would be interesting to compare o
ur estimations with their results on Dec 14, ey Dyeni? :)
for sure chavi davi! im looking at 99.7.... still .25 off u :p
Dyeni mate. mate. I need a copilot. Don't underestimate yourself!! (I guess you aced the UMAT anyway, so you'll get into med regardless of ATAR right?)
-
Sac rank 5th ~ 84% in an average cohort
Exam 1 - 34/40
Exam 2 - 72/80
thanks appreciate :P
-
Sacs: 95% ranked top 10
Exam 1: 33-36
Exam 2: 66-72
chance at 40???
thanks heaps
Maybe at the top end of your estimations. Not sure what the Sac marks could do.
I'd say with the range you've given, ~37-41
-
Sacs: 90% (fairly strong cohort)
Exam 1: 38
Exam 2: 70
~40-41
i reckon more like 42-43...
Sac ranking and marks could hurt. The 10 marks off Exam 2 is a big bumber. Still sticking with ~41
It would be interesting to compare o
ur estimations with their results on Dec 14, ey Dyeni? :)
for sure chavi davi! im looking at 99.7.... still .25 off u :p
Dyeni mate. mate. I need a copilot. Don't underestimate yourself!! (I guess you aced the UMAT anyway, so you'll get into med regardless of ATAR right?)
thats the plan :P
-
Sac rank 5th ~ 84% in an average cohort
Exam 1 - 34/40
Exam 2 - 72/80
thanks appreciate :P
Probably ~38-40
-
what about
25/40
50/80
ranked pretty shit in a strong cohort?
-
Sac rank 5th ~ 84% in an average cohort
Exam 1 - 34/40
Exam 2 - 72/80
thanks appreciate :P
39-40...
-
what about
25/40
50/80
ranked pretty shit in a strong cohort?
3..
-
What would I get if I got 34-36/40 for exam 1
And 69-73/80 for exam 2?
96% average on SACS, weak cohort. >.>
-
Sac's 98.5/100 rank 1
40/40
68-70/80
-
what about
25/40
50/80
ranked pretty shit in a strong cohort?
low thirties
-
Sac's 98.5/100 rank 1
40/40
68-70/80
43-44..
-
Unit 3 and 4 SACs 60-70%
Exam 1: 25%
Exam 2: 25%
-
What would I get if I got 34-36/40 for exam 1
And 69-73/80 for exam 2?
96% average on SACS, weak cohort. >.>
~42 Not sure how the Sacs will play out. . .
-
What would I get if I got 34-36/40 for exam 1
And 69-73/80 for exam 2?
96% average on SACS, weak cohort. >.>
~42 Not sure how the Sacs will play out. . .
Yeah same. Thanks. :]
-
Unit 3 and 4 SACs 60-70%
Exam 1: 25%
Exam 2: 25%
25% corresponds to
Exam 1: 10/40
Exam 2: 20/60
I'd say low-mid twenties. Maybe ~25
-
Sacs: 93 (but will be entered in at about 97/8)
Exam 1:40
Exam 2: 70-72
Cohort is good top end, solid middle, shit bottom.
-
Sacs: 93 (but will be entered in at about 97/8)
Exam 1:40
Exam 2: 70-72
Cohort is good top end, solid middle, shit bottom.
~43-35 Depending on the state average for Exam 2.
-
is thirty possible.
20 give or a take a couple of marks/40
45-50/80
average ranking in average cohort
-
Sacs: 93 (but will be entered in at about 97/8)
Exam 1:40
Exam 2: 70-72
Cohort is good top end, solid middle, shit bottom.
~43-35 Depending on the state average for Exam 2.
35?? that low????
-
Sacs: 93 (but will be entered in at about 97/8)
Exam 1:40
Exam 2: 70-72
Cohort is good top end, solid middle, shit bottom.
~43-35 Depending on the state average for Exam 2.
35?? that low????
i think he meant 45 :P
-
Sacs: 93 (but will be entered in at about 97/8)
Exam 1:40
Exam 2: 70-72
Cohort is good top end, solid middle, shit bottom.
haha, that makes more sense, if i can pull of a 45 id be stoked, especially after a shit 2nd exam
~43-35 Depending on the state average for Exam 2.
35?? that low????
i think he meant 45 :P
-
Okkk here are my deplorable estimations
Exam 1: 26/40
Exam 2: 53/80
Average Sacs in a strong cohort
is an ss of 32 still possible?
-
Okkk here are my deplorable estimations
Exam 1: 26/40
Exam 2: 53/80
Average Sacs in a strong cohort
is an ss of 32 still possible?
hard to say, anywhere between 28 and 35..
-
Sac's: 100%
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 76-78/80
Average cohort but 5 got all 100%.
45-47 SS?
-
SACS: Mid A+
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 68/80
Can 43 be done?
-
Probably not.... I'd say a 39/40.
-
SACS: Mid A+
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 68/80
Can 43 be done?
Wouldn't bet on it
-
my turn
SACS: Mid A
Exam 1: 35//40
Exam 2: 68/80
Is it still possible for me to get a 40 raw?
-
Okkk here are my deplorable estimations
Exam 1: 26/40
Exam 2: 53/80
Average Sacs in a strong cohort
is an ss of 32 still possible?
hard to say, anywhere between 28 and 35..
ew. a 28, really? oh wells, i should have studied -.-
but yeah, thanks for the prediction :)
-
Okkk here are my deplorable estimations
Exam 1: 26/40
Exam 2: 53/80
Average Sacs in a strong cohort
is an ss of 32 still possible?
hard to say, anywhere between 28 and 35..
ew. a 28, really? oh wells, i should have studied -.-
but yeah, thanks for the prediction :)
welkl the 26 will be a lucky B, the 53 could be a B as well, with average sacs... hmm actually maybe more like 33ish...
-
personally i tink some of you are predicting scores way too low
-
Okkk here are my deplorable estimations
Exam 1: 26/40
Exam 2: 53/80
Average Sacs in a strong cohort
is an ss of 32 still possible?
hard to say, anywhere between 28 and 35..
ew. a 28, really? oh wells, i should have studied -.-
but yeah, thanks for the prediction :)
welkl the 26 will be a lucky B, the 53 could be a B as well, with average sacs... hmm actually maybe more like 33ish...
ahhk cool, a 33 would be nice...as long as i didn't overestimate :S
-
okay i compared with itute
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78/80
Sacs High A to Low A+
Very strong cohort.
I was hoping for 42+
-
okay i compared with itute
Exam 1 : 38-39/40
Exam 2 : 78/80
Sacs High A to Low A+
Very strong cohort.
I was hoping for 42+
47~49 maybe even 50
-
My friend got
Exam 1 35/40
Exam 2 80/80
Sac Rankings Mid A+
Cohort VERY STRONG
What do you think he would get?
-
exam 1
36/40
exam 2 74/80
sacs 98 strong cohort.
-
My friend got
Exam 1 35/40
Exam 2 80/80
Sac Rankings Mid A+
Cohort VERY STRONG
What do you think he would get?
farkkk, 80/80 :O
-
I've never done this before, but:
Exam 1: 39-40/40
Exam 2: 75-78/80
Sacs: 99% average.
Average cohort.
-
I've never done this before, but:
Exam 1: 39-40/40
Exam 2: 75-78/80
Sacs: 99% average.
Average cohort.
46~50
-
34/40
65/80
about 20th in SACs out of 80 from a pretty strong cohort
Thanks.
-
My friend got
Exam 1 35/40
Exam 2 80/80
Sac Rankings Mid A+
Cohort VERY STRONG
What do you think he would get?
farkkk, 80/80 :O
yeah he got owned by the cone of death
but raped victoria jones and everything LOL
-
33-35 for exam 1
71-73 for exam 2
I don't know about the SACs, our school tells us what we get out of 10, so we can't work out our study scores or something like that <_<
But pretty much one of the top students :)
-
33-34/40 exam 1
probably about 60-65/80 for exam 2
sacs: Low A+/high A, large strong cohort (private school)
What does everyone think - maybe 35+ raw?
-
Could i get some help please
Completely F****ed exam 1: 20/40
Exam 2: 47/80
Top 30% in a medium cohort B+ SAC average
Please tell me its atleast a 32
-
(32 or 33)/40
72/80
A-A+ SACS - strong cohort around top 30ish from 150
any indication would be greatly appreciated:)
-
exam 1
36/40
exam 2 74/80
sacs 98 strong cohort.
anyone?
-
exam 1
36/40
exam 2 74/80
sacs 98 strong cohort.
anyone?
45+?
-
what will this get me?
sacs 89%
Exam 1: 33/40
Exam 2: 60/80
-
Could i get some help please
Completely F****ed exam 1: 20/40
Exam 2: 47/80
Top 30% in a medium cohort B+ SAC average
Please tell me its atleast a 32
Same here! I'm hoping for anything >=30 raw
-
exam1: 39/40
exam2: 65
is this likely to land me a 38???
-
exam1: 39/40
exam2: 65
is this likely to land me a 38???
Yes
-
Hmm, can someone pls predict my SS
I got rank one in the MHS cohort.
I got 23/40 for exam one
and 63/80 for exam two
can i still get a 50?
-
Hmm, can someone pls predict my SS
I got rank one in the MHS cohort.
I got 23/40 for exam one
and 63/80 for exam two
can i still get a 50?
Not even close maybe 38?
-
Hey
sac:low A
exam 1: 30/40
exam 2: 55/80
thanks!!
-
Could i get some help please
Completely F****ed exam 1: 20/40
Exam 2: 47/80
Top 30% in a medium cohort B+ SAC average
Please tell me its atleast a 32
Some tell us what we will get!! :)
Same here! I'm hoping for anything >=30 raw
-
Hmm, can someone pls predict my SS
I got rank one in the MHS cohort.
I got 23/40 for exam one
and 63/80 for exam two
can i still get a 50?
It's nice to set your aim high - but you're on the wrong end of a normal distribution curve for a 50 :)
Maybe mid thirties ~33-34
-
33-35 for exam 1
71-73 for exam 2
I don't know about the SACs, our school tells us what we get out of 10, so we can't work out our study scores or something like that <_<
But pretty much one of the top students :)
Sorry to be a pain, but .. yeah. Thanks in advance :smitten:
-
personally i tink some of you are predicting scores way too low
Conservatism principle. Better to take a worst-case scenario approach to Study Score predictions, and get a wonderful surprise at the end of the year, rather than give empty promises and come out with a rude shock on Dec 14.
-
33-35 for exam 1
71-73 for exam 2
I don't know about the SACs, our school tells us what we get out of 10, so we can't work out our study scores or something like that <_<
But pretty much one of the top students :)
Sorry to be a pain, but .. yeah. Thanks in advance :smitten:
Probably ~39-40 - those exam 1 marks can really put the SS down.
-
Could i get some help please
Completely F****ed exam 1: 20/40
Exam 2: 47/80
Top 30% in a medium cohort B+ SAC average
Please tell me its atleast a 32
Some tell us what we will get!! :)
Same here! I'm hoping for anything >=30 raw
Sorry to be a pain, but .. yeah. Thanks in advance smitten
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
-
personally i tink some of you are predicting scores way too low
Conservatism principle. Better to take a worst-case scenario approach to Study Score predictions, and get a wonderful surprise at the end of the year, rather than give empty promises and come out with a rude shock on Dec 14.
definately agree, id rather be l dissapointed now then at the end of the year
-
Ok, we have arranged a rally against VCAA this saturday at 4:30 pm. please bring any molotov cocktails, grenades, britney spears albums, bazookas and other various harmful items.
cheers
-
personally i tink some of you are predicting scores way too low
Conservatism principle. Better to take a worst-case scenario approach to Study Score predictions, and get a wonderful surprise at the end of the year, rather than give empty promises and come out with a rude shock on Dec 14.
Agreed. Thanks :)
-
Ok, we have arranged a rally against VCAA this saturday at 4:30 pm. please bring any molotov cocktails, grenades, britney spears albums, bazookas and other various harmful items.
cheers
too far
-
EXAM 1: 33
EXAM 2: 74-75
SACS: 97
...if anyone can still be stuffed replying, i'd appreciate it
-
Can someone please predict mine with these? :)
38/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
Low-Mid A+ Rank 3 in a strong cohort
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
-
Can someone please predict mine with these? :)
38/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
Low-Mid A+ Rank 3 in a strong cohort
My guess is that u will easily get 48-50 scaled. but continuing with the VCEnotes standard of SS predictions, u are looking at a raw score of 33 tops.
-
Will this get 30 even:
27/40 exam 1
30/80 exam 2
70/100 sacs
-
Can someone please predict mine with these? :)
38/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
Low-Mid A+ Rank 3 in a strong cohort
Not sure how that ranking will pan out (depends on how well the top 2 in the cohort performed), but if everything falls into line, then it's probably ~49-50
-
Will this get 30 even:
27/40 exam 1
30/80 exam 2
70/100 sacs
:(, not sure, i dont think it will.
27/30 is definitely above median and is a strong score for ambitions of a 30 SS, but 30/80 will let u down irrespective of the immense difficulty.
-
Can someone please predict mine with these? :)
38/40 Exam 1
79/80 Exam 2
Low-Mid A+ Rank 3 in a strong cohort
Not sure how that ranking will pan out (depends on how well the top 2 in the cohort performed), but if everything falls into line, then it's probably ~49-50
Sounds like what my brother said he got <_<
(ZOMG if it is actually my brother who posted that.....)
-
Will this get 30 even:
27/40 exam 1
30/80 exam 2
70/100 sacs
I don't think this will crack 30. Probably ~25-27
-
VCAA: 2 Methods Students: 0
hmm lets just kill the physics exam and we can call it square
-
ok people just to help the estimating i used 07 results (which will be too high compared to this year) in Mao's calculator, i had:
GA 1: A - low
GA 2: 29/40 --> high B+
GA 3: 40/80 --> high B
range for SS was 32-34 :)
you may all now exhale
-
I have come to realise, that i do not like VCAA very much
-
ok people just to help the estimating i used 07 results (which will be too high compared to this year) in Mao's calculator, i had:
GA 1: A - low
GA 2: 29/40 --> high B+
GA 3: 40/80 --> high B
range for SS was 32-34 :)
you may all now exhale
i can sleep in peace now, btw wut would the study score of 38 or 39 be then??
-
ok people just to help the estimating i used 07 results (which will be too high compared to this year) in Mao's calculator, i had:
GA 1: A - low
GA 2: 29/40 --> high B+
GA 3: 40/80 --> high B
range for SS was 32-34 :)
you may all now exhale
Wow, those scores are like identical to mine *exhales*
-
The pyramid of death was eaaasy, that was the easiest writen response question, u just had to use the Area of triangle formular on the formula sheet and it wouldve been easy, if u used the 0.5 x base x height, then it woudlve been harder.
0.5 x b x c x sin(angle) = Area of a triangle where b and c are two side lengths
-
How about this???
Exam 1 : 30/40
Exam 2 : 60/80
Sacs: 97/100
Rank one (by far) in a crapppp cohort
-
Hey can sum 1 plz help predict my scores:
E1: 33-34
E2: 74-76
SACS: 97
howd evry 1 else go? :)
-
for 38- 60/80
for 39- 63/80
based only from the 2nd exam results
keep in mind that the A+ cut off for 07 was 62.5
-
exam 1- ~37/40
exam 2- 72-73/80
sacs- up there in a strong cohort.
-
for 38- 60/80
for 39- 63/80
based only from the 2nd exam results
keep in mind that the A+ cut off for 07 was 62.5
fank u!!..i guess it isnt dat bad..~
-
40/40
72-74/80
be kind :X
Also what you think if i drop down to 70/80 and 38/40
-
What's this calculator of Maos that is so accurate?
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
Everyone I know outside of VN dropped a lot of marks. Most left slabs of the paper blank. I go to Mac.Rob and have a few MHS friends, so even though exam fatigue was rife, I'm pretty sure that when some of the top ranked students at my school (for overall academic excellence) don't finish a paper, it can be considered difficult. When many people see questions they're not familiar with, they panic. That's what happened in the exam. I think it's pretty hard for someone to judge without having done it in exam conditions. Apparently 08 had a cut off of about 64 or 65, and it was miles more difficult. I've done 07 and I found it more difficult. Everyone I spoke to found it more difficult than Kilbaha. Perhaps some of the top scores will be dominated by maths olympiad campers, but for the majority of the cohort, it wasn't a good paper. I would be very surprised if it's on par with the 2007 cut off, because the questions on 2007 were slightly more complicated versions of standard problems.
-
well i tested with my business score and it was dead on, estimated 34-36 i got 35.
theres the calculator and tutorial on how it works :)
-
Do you guys reckon 32/33 would be Mid/Low A for Exam 1?
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
Everyone I know outside of VN dropped a lot of marks. Most left slabs of the paper blank. I go to Mac.Rob and have a few MHS friends, so even though exam fatigue was rife, I'm pretty sure that when some of the top ranked students at my school (for overall academic excellence) don't finish a paper, it can be considered difficult. When many people see questions they're not familiar with, they panic. That's what happened in the exam. I think it's pretty hard for someone to judge without having done it in exam conditions. Apparently 08 had a cut off of about 64 or 65, and it was miles more difficult. I've done 07 and I found it more difficult. Everyone I spoke to found it more difficult than Kilbaha. Perhaps some of the top scores will be dominated by maths olympiad campers, but for the majority of the cohort, it wasn't a good paper. I would be very surprised if it's on par with the 2007 cut off, because the questions on 2007 were slightly more complicated versions of standard problems.
well from my experience in vcaa papers, i got:
07- mid A
08- lowest A+
09- highest B+
10- 42/80
i think it will have a lower cut off than 07.
-
Do you guys reckon 32/33 would be Mid/Low A for Exam 1?
Yeah, might even be a high a.
-
anyone wanna be a legend and tweak maos calculator such that it gives an indication of study score specific to methods, i am far too lazy
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
Everyone I know outside of VN dropped a lot of marks. Most left slabs of the paper blank. I go to Mac.Rob and have a few MHS friends, so even though exam fatigue was rife, I'm pretty sure that when some of the top ranked students at my school (for overall academic excellence) don't finish a paper, it can be considered difficult. When many people see questions they're not familiar with, they panic. That's what happened in the exam. I think it's pretty hard for someone to judge without having done it in exam conditions. Apparently 08 had a cut off of about 64 or 65, and it was miles more difficult. I've done 07 and I found it more difficult. Everyone I spoke to found it more difficult than Kilbaha. Perhaps some of the top scores will be dominated by maths olympiad campers, but for the majority of the cohort, it wasn't a good paper. I would be very surprised if it's on par with the 2007 cut off, because the questions on 2007 were slightly more complicated versions of standard problems.
well from my experience in vcaa papers, i got:
07- mid A
08- lowest A+
09- highest B+
10- 42/80
i think it will have a lower cut off than 07.
I got A+s on 07-09 (dropped 2 marks on 09) but lost 9-14 marks on today's exam.
-
there's your evidence people ^^
-
hmm i'm thinking i got 72-74/80 hopefully :)
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
Everyone I know outside of VN dropped a lot of marks. Most left slabs of the paper blank. I go to Mac.Rob and have a few MHS friends, so even though exam fatigue was rife, I'm pretty sure that when some of the top ranked students at my school (for overall academic excellence) don't finish a paper, it can be considered difficult. When many people see questions they're not familiar with, they panic. That's what happened in the exam. I think it's pretty hard for someone to judge without having done it in exam conditions. Apparently 08 had a cut off of about 64 or 65, and it was miles more difficult. I've done 07 and I found it more difficult. Everyone I spoke to found it more difficult than Kilbaha. Perhaps some of the top scores will be dominated by maths olympiad campers, but for the majority of the cohort, it wasn't a good paper. I would be very surprised if it's on par with the 2007 cut off, because the questions on 2007 were slightly more complicated versions of standard problems.
I'ld have to agree with Appianway here.
Coming from a school which gets 112 students getting scores above 40 for methods (out of ~300 methods students), there were very few people coming out of that with smiley faces, when the guy said you may leave it was just a huge groan. I would easily say that way more than 1 in 3 of the boys lost more than 10 marks, and given those 1 in 3 should statistically be receiving A+ marks according to previous years, it would indicate that this paper was much more difficult than any previous years.
Will it be lower than 2007? Personally, I would like to think so in interest of my own score and that for my peers. I do think this was more difficult conceptually with the last three parts of the final question, the expected value, and the very last portion of the pyramid part, add on about 2 multichoice questions which were difficult. That would make me think that the cutoff would be at least 5 lower than that of 2007.
However there are factors like 2007 CAS being a rather new concept, and the fact that our company exam papers are based off these previous exams, which makes 2007 look comparatively easier to us. That's why i think the cutoff mark will be around the same as that in 07, so you would be looking at losing 8-10 marks for a 44+ and about 3-4 marks for the big 50. This is taking into account that exam 1 was very easy given that students are officially confirmed to have been awarded consequential marks for the "cone of death".
If it's relevant, I full marked 07, got 76/80 for 08, and 68/80 for 09 (after cramming 16 exams into the weekend), and probably 70-74 for this one.
-
40/40
72-74/80
be kind :X
Also what you think if i drop down to 70/80 and 38/40
for 74 and 40
48 ( a mate got 47 last year with 76 and 40 and considering last years papers were soo much easier )
70 and 38
44
-
Just to keep things in perspective, guys, apparently the median/mean last year for paper 2 was 44 or something. So predicting low 30s for people with mid 60s is a bit absurd, especially considering the A+ cut off will be very, very low 60s or high 50s.
And did that many people really get above 70? Most people I know didn't attempt everything on the paper, guessed a lot or got a lot wrong. And most of my friends are pretty good at maths... I'd say that above 70 on that paper would be in the top few percent at the very lowest.
Whilst difficulty does fluctuate, I doubt the cutoff will be that low.
Generally Losing 8+ marks on Exam 2 and 4+ marks on Exam 1 is a low 40.
I glanced through the exam, and it was comparable in difficulty to VCAA 2007. A rough Study Score can easily be predicted by previous reports.
And I don't think you can judge the performance of the entire state just by asking those around you - exam fatigue and over-speculation are generally rife immediately after the exam. . .
Everyone I know outside of VN dropped a lot of marks. Most left slabs of the paper blank. I go to Mac.Rob and have a few MHS friends, so even though exam fatigue was rife, I'm pretty sure that when some of the top ranked students at my school (for overall academic excellence) don't finish a paper, it can be considered difficult. When many people see questions they're not familiar with, they panic. That's what happened in the exam. I think it's pretty hard for someone to judge without having done it in exam conditions. Apparently 08 had a cut off of about 64 or 65, and it was miles more difficult. I've done 07 and I found it more difficult. Everyone I spoke to found it more difficult than Kilbaha. Perhaps some of the top scores will be dominated by maths olympiad campers, but for the majority of the cohort, it wasn't a good paper. I would be very surprised if it's on par with the 2007 cut off, because the questions on 2007 were slightly more complicated versions of standard problems.
This.
I have come to realise that the people of VN are like the cream from every top school. Even at my school (glenny) which is considered to be quite reputable for a public school have many people who have left pages of questions. And yes, people into competitive maths would have definitely loved this paper considering that it gives them more room for silly errors and the ability to show more of their potential.
-
as strange as it is i really enjoy the difficult questions, because when u finally figure it out its just a far greater satisfaction than having the answer given to you but....not to this level of difficulty
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
-
No one will accept it. This was an absurdly hard paper. Anything over 70 really is a pretty good mark.
It's funny how all the people who sat it say it is hard, yet all the 'experts' who have done methods before claim that it wasn't do bad.
Well I have news for you:
-You didn't sit the exam under timed conditions, or under pressure, so you really are in no position to comment
-Those who did methods exams in 08 and 09, no offence, but it would take a much bigger effort in 2010 to pull off a high result than it did in those years...
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
you are a god jack chan
-
exam 1: 38/40
exam 2: 74-75 / 80
ranked 3 in a strong cohort i'd say
what would i get around ? :\
-
No one will accept it. This was an absurdly hard paper. Anything over 70 really is a pretty good mark.
It's funny how all the people who sat it say it is hard, yet all the 'experts' who have done methods before claim that it wasn't do bad.
Well I have news for you:
-You didn't sit the exam under timed conditions, or under pressure, so you really are in no position to comment
-Those who did methods exams in 08 and 09, no offence, but it would take a much bigger effort in 2010 to pull off a high result than it did in those years...
agreed!
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
you are a god jack chan
sorry dude i an NO WHERE near the respected VN member u r kev LOLOL
-
Oh by the way, when i flicked through the paper in reading time I thought it was easy too. Try sitting it.
-
exam 1: 38/40
exam 2: 74-75 / 80
ranked 3 in a strong cohort i'd say
what would i get around ? :\
50 for you :)
-
exam 1: 38/40
exam 2: 74-75 / 80
ranked 3 in a strong cohort i'd say
what would i get around ? :\
40+ easy
only? no way thats in 45+ territory
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
sorry dude i an NO WHERE near the respected VN member u r kev LOLOL
you are a god jack chan
Lol, your 48 or so for Methods will make up for it man.
-
Oh by the way, when i flicked through the paper in reading time I thought it was easy too. Try sitting it.
Haha, same. In reading time I was like, oh this is not too bad. Then tried doing half the questions and everything just turned to shit...
-
sorry jason
but i think the only one in victoria getting a 50 will be you
i think you topped the whole state :)
-
Lol, your 48 or so for Methods will make up for it man.
no where near... i realised i got the E(X) question wrong, 3 marks gone :'(
[/quote]
Haha, only 3 marks man. You're still ahead of me. You'll get 50 for Phys and Chem anyway ;)
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
sorry dude i an NO WHERE near the respected VN member u r kev LOLOL
Lol, your 48 or so for Methods will make up for it man.
No where near man... I lost another 3 marks on the E(X) question :'(
-
Do me?
Sacs = mid A+
Exam 1 = 30/40
Exam 2 = 55-60/80
-
predict meeee
mid A+ sacs
38/40 Exam 1
76/80 Exam 2
sorry dude i an NO WHERE near the respected VN member u r kev LOLOL
Lol, your 48 or so for Methods will make up for it man.
No where near man... I lost another 3 marks on the E(X) question :'(
You're still ahead of me lol. I lost 7 marks exam 1. :(
I got the first mc wrong as well, that's embarassing
-
students are officially confirmed to have been awarded consequential marks for the "cone of death".[/quote]
Can you please elaborate on this? I have not heard this at all....
-
gg i suck at the VCE notes quoting LOL and no i said ANOTHER 3 marks :(
btw how do u give karma?
-
students are officially confirmed to have been awarded consequential marks for the "cone of death".
Can you please elaborate on this? I have not heard this at all....
[/quote]
yes if u continued to do the part b and c of the question correctly with ur answer from part a, u still get 3/5 marks :)
-
i really suck at this quoting thing LOLOL
-
Do me?
Sacs = mid A+
Exam 1 = 30/40
Exam 2 = 55-60/80
okay i will DO you :)
come here babyyy LOL
jks :p
-
Click positive or negative under a person.
You lost 2 for the first, 7 for the second.
I lost 7 for the first, 3 for the second.
you're still ahead lol
-
Could someone predict me?
Rank #1 of a fairly weak cohort (My average for the year is 91%, but the rest of the class varies between 40% and 80%)
Exam 1: 26-30/40
Exam 2: 55-62/80
-
uugh, apparently i've gotten
38/40 and ~65/80
SAC's were pretty good.
Any chance of a 40, considering the difficulty of the exam?
-
uugh, apparently i've gotten
38/40 and ~65/80
SAC's were pretty good.
Any chance of a 40, considering the difficulty of the exam?
Fairly comfortably i'd say
-
students are officially confirmed to have been awarded consequential marks for the "cone of death".
Can you please elaborate on this? I have not heard this at all....
yes if u continued to do the part b and c of the question correctly with ur answer from part a, u still get 3/5 marks :)
[/quote]
Ok thanks man! Good to hear! Where did you hear this from?
-
Sacs = mid A+
Exam 1 = 30/40
Exam 2 = 55-60/80
anyone?
thanks
-
uugh, apparently i've gotten
38/40 and ~65/80
SAC's were pretty good.
Any chance of a 40, considering the difficulty of the exam?
Fairly comfortably i'd say
I like your optimism!
-
students are officially confirmed to have been awarded consequential marks for the "cone of death".
Can you please elaborate on this? I have not heard this at all....
yes if u continued to do the part b and c of the question correctly with ur answer from part a, u still get 3/5 marks :)
Ok thanks man! Good to hear! Where did you hear this from?
here take a look at this link :)
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33254.0.html
-
Exam 1: 32-33/40
Exam 2: 65-70/80
Ranked in the top 5 in an average-strong cohort
SS 35... maybe?
I was really hoping for a 40 :(
-
33-34/40 exam 1
50ish/80 exam 2
low A in sacs...
any chance of a 35?
-
Stonecold you're freaking me out, you're pretty much where I'm at for like 3 subjects now. You'll probably beat me in English though (as will the rest of Victoria), and I don't do English language so I reckon the similarities end here ;)
-
33-34/40 exam 1
50ish/80 exam 2
low A in sacs...
any chance of a 35?
Pretty much the same boat as you. And GOD I hope so, for both our sakes!!!
-
Exam 1: 32-33/40
Exam 2: 65-70/80
Ranked in the top 5 in an average-strong cohort
SS 35... maybe?
I was really hoping for a 40 :(
get that 70/80 and i think you'll get 40 :)
-
whattttttt about
exam 1: 30/40
exam 2: 60/80
sacs : 97/100
number one by a long shot in the cohort....
never thought i'd go worse in methods than i did in spec!!!
-
How bout
Rank 2 93% average cohort
Exam 1: 32-34
Exam 2: 68-71
Worst case senario ?
Thanks a bunch
-
SACS: Mid A
Exam 1: 35//40
Exam 2: 68/80
fingers crossed...
-
for the two guys ontop of me, both 39-40
byr003, im thinking 34 ish
-
SACS- 80% (rank 4)
exam 1 - 15/40
exam 2 30-35/80
lol i know it is pretty bad, its my 10% subject, just wondering if that would still get me like a 25 raw???
thanks
-
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 73/80
SACs: 96% in a very strong cohort
whaddya think?
-
for the two guys ontop of me, both 39-40
byr003, im thinking 34 ish
thanks alot taiga i reallllllllly hope i can pull a 40
-
SACS- 80% (rank 4)
exam 1 - 15/40
exam 2 30-35/80
lol i know it is pretty bad, its my 10% subject, just wondering if that would still get me like a 25 raw???
thanks
your exam 1 really lets you down man :(
i dont want to call it as a 25 raw, your exam 2 score is pretty good for that study score, but exam 1 you really needed 20% =\
bambi - I'ld like to say you'll get 45, because that's roughly the same marks as I'm looking at :P
-
Thanks taiga hope your right or else..... Nuh jk thanks for the estimate
-
What about..
Rank 3rd - 28/40 and 58/40
and then 30/40 and 60/40...what would be the difference?
-
hey yall
got 33/40 exam one
and ~63/80 exam two
sacs fairly avg got an E,C,C+,B+ and an A+
any chance of a 35 RAW?
-
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 77/80
Any chance of a 45?
-
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 77/80
Any chance of a 45?
'
Easy
-
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 77/80
Any chance of a 45?
48
-
do you rkn i can get 38 with
sacs: 89%
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 60/80
-
Anyone:
SAC 95.5/100 strong cohort (if last year is anything to go by, 3 kids got 50) not sure of exact rank, but I know i'm one of the top 3
Exam 1 40/40
Exam 2 74/80 (worst-case)
-
Anyone:
SAC 95.5/100 strong cohort (if last year is anything to go by, 3 kids got 50) not sure of exact rank, but I know i'm one of the top 3
Exam 1 40/40
Exam 2 74/80 (worst-case)
48
-
do you rkn i can get 38 with
sacs: 89%
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 60/80
hmmm, possible but it would be close
-
What about...
SACS: B+ average
Exam 1: 34/40
Exam 2: 50/80
-
exam 1- ~37/40
exam 2- 72-73/80
sacs- up there in a strong cohort.
anyone?
-
exam 1- ~37/40
exam 2- 72-73/80
sacs- up there in a strong cohort.
Around 44
anyone?
-
Anyone:
SAC 95.5/100 strong cohort (if last year is anything to go by, 3 kids got 50) not sure of exact rank, but I know i'm one of the top 3
Exam 1 40/40
Exam 2 74/80 (worst-case)
48
I'd say 50.
-
WORST CASE SCENARIO:
Exam 1 - 27 out of 40
Exam 2 - 55 out of 80
SACS - ~C+
IDEAL SCENARIO:
Exam 1 - 28 out of 40
Exam 2 - 60-62 out of 80
SACS - ~C+
What would I be looking at for these scenarios?
-
Okay feeling a tad stupid here...
Exam 1 - 26/40
Exam 2- 45/80
Sacs; high B+
-
Okay feeling a tad stupid here...
Exam 1 - 26/40
Exam 2- 45/80
Sacs; high B+
You shouldnt feel stupid, those scores are above average..I reckon a 32-35?
-
Don't feel stupid puffle, in the exact same boat if not worst
-
what am i looking at? and just exactly how important are sacs compared to the exam?
exam 1: 39-40/40
exam 2:~79/80
not including carelessness which i don't think i made :P
low 90s for sacs in a strong cohort
ranked like around teens or possibly twenties
-
:)
what about this?
SACs about 85-90% ranked about 8-10th-ish.
Exam 1 - 36-38/40
Exam 2 60-67/80
thankkss :)
-
what score out of 120 is needed for a 40 raw?
-
SACS: 87% ( decent cohort)
30/40
60/80
-
what am i looking at? and just exactly how important are sacs compared to the exam?
exam 1: 39-40/40
exam 2:~79/80
not including carelessness which i don't think i made :P
low 90s for sacs in a strong cohort
ranked like around teens or possibly twenties
~34
-
@Taiga,
~34?? As fucking if.
You'd get very high 40s if not a 50.
-
hes trollin'
-
The kid already knows he's got a 50, he's the one that's trollin'
-
Well it doesn't help to double-the-troll and actually make lower scoring students freak out :P
But seriously, I got perfect SAC marks, 39/40 and 82/80 (depending on how many VCAA examiners I sleep with in the next week)... Am I looking at a ~12 after scaling?!!?!?
-
what if i got very low A+s for all three
-
Hi guys,
Exam 1: ~35/40
Exam 2: ~70/80
Don't know where I'm ranked, but definitely strong cohort.
What SS would I be looking at?
-
oh god this is so bad.
exam 1: 20/40
exam 2: 40/80
what study score will that get me??
-
oh god this is so bad.
exam 1: 20/40
exam 2: 40/80
Exam 1: 15/40
Exam 2: 25/80
Will this get me a 25? or no chance
-
can someone please predict mine?
SACS: 84% VERY Strong Cohert
Exam 1: 36/40
Exam 2: 65/80
THANKYOU :)
-
ranked 2 95/100 in a moderate cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 68~70/80
is 40+ still achievable?
anyone please help me... if i dont get 40+raw i hav to repeat yr 12
-
ranked 2 95/100 in a moderate cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 68~70/80
is 40+ still achievable?
anyone please help me... if i dont get 40+raw i hav to repeat yr 12
wow that seems kinda harsh
and 40 plus is more than achievable with a score like that in exam 2
-
ranked 2 95/100 in a moderate cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 68~70/80
is 40+ still achievable?
anyone please help me... if i dont get 40+raw i hav to repeat yr 12
wow that seems kinda harsh
and 40 plus is more than achievable with a score like that in exam 2
I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE SO WORRIED.. ID BE OVER THE MOON
fk my life.......exam 2 was a BITCH
-
ranked 2 95/100 in a moderate cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 68~70/80
is 40+ still achievable?
anyone please help me... if i dont get 40+raw i hav to repeat yr 12
wow that seems kinda harsh
and 40 plus is more than achievable with a score like that in exam 2
I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LIKE THIS ARE SO WORRIED.. ID BE OVER THE MOON
fk my life.......exam 2 was a BITCH
i know right? makes me wanna punch them in the face
-
hi!
sac marks have been good in a strong cohort, not sure of exact marks but should be A+
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 60/80
am i looking at a 37-38 here? :)
-
hi!
sac marks have been good in a strong cohort, not sure of exact marks but should be A+
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 60/80
am i looking at a 37-38 here? :)
congratulations youll be getting 40+
-
i hope so!
thats such a relief to hear, especially after reading some of chavi's predictions which i thought were a bit low...
-
ranked 2 95/100 in a moderate cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 68~70/80
is 40+ still achievable?
anyone please help me... if i dont get 40+raw i hav to repeat yr 12
If the cutoff is as low as 07 for exam 2, I think you'ld get about 43-44
-
do mine please?
worst case and best case scenario
exam 1: 29/40
exam 2: 40/80
exam 1: 31/40
exam 2: 50/80
sacs are medium A :)
-
hi!
sac marks have been good in a strong cohort, not sure of exact marks but should be A+
exam 1: 35/40
exam 2: 60/80
am i looking at a 37-38 here? :)
congratulations youll be getting 40+
Wat! Are you really being serious?
-
what do you think it will be mostafa?
-
I'm ranked 4th in the cohort, I think I got 72/80, number 1 got around 75, number 2 got 69, and number 3 around 55.
Does anyone know how detrimental number 3s exam mark would be to my score?
-
what do you think it will be mostafa?
Well a 38 for sure but I'm not sure about 40+. Though it would be great if that is actually true as I'm in a similiar situation to you.
-
I'm ranked 4th in the cohort, I think I got 72/80, number 1 got around 75, number 2 got 69, and number 3 around 55.
Does anyone know how detrimental number 3s exam mark would be to my score?
You'll still get 40 easily
-
well lets hope its a 40 mostofa! cant blame her for injecting some optimism into me :)
-
well lets hope its a 40 mostofa! cant blame her for injecting some optimism into me :)
Yeah guess we do need some good news to cheer us up in this rather dark period :)
-
So...After going over the solutions again....
Predict my SS if:
SACs 96.5%, Weak cohort
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 67/80
*shattered*
-
That's an awesome score. You sound like you'd be getting middle to high 40s raw.
-
So...After going over the solutions again....
Predict my SS if:
SACs 96.5%, Weak cohort
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 67/80
*shattered*
That's an awesome score. You sound like you'd be getting middle to high 40s raw.
I'm sorry but mid 40's is ridiculous. I think however you will get around 38 raw, depending on how well your cohort does.
That's still a really awesome score though, you should be proud. :)
-
Hey I would appreciate if someone could predict a score for me
sac: average A
exam1: 31/40
exam2: 53/80
hoping for 35, still possible?
-
So...After going over the solutions again....
Predict my SS if:
SACs 96.5%, Weak cohort
Exam 1: 35/40
Exam 2: 67/80
*shattered*
That's an awesome score. You sound like you'd be getting middle to high 40s raw.
I'm sorry but mid 40's is ridiculous. I think however you will get around 38 raw, depending on how well your cohort does.
That's still a really awesome score though, you should be proud. :)
Yeah thats what I thought. *sigh* gg.
-
What would a 38/40 , 63/80 and a 90/100 in a strong cohort get me?
-
SAC average: B+ in very strong cohort
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 48/80
Study score?
-
High A Sacs (Strong cohort, though I'm still not sure how much it matters)
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 74/80
Would really appreciate a prediction.
-
High A Sacs (Strong cohort, though I'm still not sure how much it matters)
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 74/80
Would really appreciate a prediction.
~45-46
-
High A Sacs (Strong cohort, though I'm still not sure how much it matters)
Exam 1 - 38/40
Exam 2 - 74/80
Would really appreciate a prediction.
Well into the 40s, I reckon. That exam 2 score is awesome!!!
-
After looking at solutions..
87/100 SACS
30/40
64/80
38 RAW?
-
Thanks for the quick replies. =)
Yeah, everything was going smooth for exam 2 til I hit q3 (similar for a lot of people it seems). Chose to use the cosine rule, making everything so much more complicated than required (couldn't simplify a thing).
-
Hey can someone please do mine?
SAC: 90% strong cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 73/80
Thanks
-
Hey can someone please do mine?
SAC: 90% strong cohort
Exam 1: 40/40
Exam 2: 73/80
Thanks
conservatively i can say 45,
-
just checked the solution and i did better than i expected
SAC: 94% rank 2 (the top of the cohort is strong but the bottom/middle is really weak)
Exam1 :40/40
Exam2 :79/80
thanks
-
just checked the solution and i did better than i expected
SAC: 94% rank 2 (the top of the cohort is strong but the bottom/middle is really weak)
Exam1 :40/40
Exam2 :79/80
thanks
50 !
edit: oh n can we like swap vtac id numbers plz ? :P
-
just checked the solution and i did better than i expected
SAC: 94% rank 2 (the top of the cohort is strong but the bottom/middle is really weak)
Exam1 :40/40
Exam2 :79/80
thanks
50 !
Should scale to 55 haha. That is an amazing effort!!!
-
ok what about
low A+/high A sacs strong cohort
35/40 exam 1 (if examiners decide to give us consequential marks for cone of death)
55/80 exam 2 (...)
please dont be TOO harsh k
-
just checked the solution and i did better than i expected
SAC: 94% rank 2 (the top of the cohort is strong but the bottom/middle is really weak)
Exam1 :40/40
Exam2 :79/80
thanks
50 !
Should scale to 55 haha. That is an amazing effort!!!
haha thanks, wish i did this well in spesh :'(
-
Can someone predict my please? :)
SACs - 1st/2nd in moderate cohort of about 100 students.
Exam 1 - 39/40
Exam 2 - 73ish/80.
Thanks
-
who wants to predict mine?
28/40 Exam 1
30/80 Exam 2
LMAO!
-
SACS about low 70s
-
SAC average: B+ in very strong cohort
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 48/80
Study score?
-
SACs: All A+ until I screwed the last one and got a B+. I believe I was ranked 2nd or 3rd before my last SAC.
Exam 1:40/40
Exam 2:80/80
If this is the case, have I made up for my last SAC?
-
SACs: All A+ until I screwed the last one and got a B+. I believe I was ranked 2nd or 3rd before my last SAC.
Exam 1:40/40
Exam 2:80/80
If this is the case, have I made up for my last SAC?
lol yes defs
-
SACs: All A+ until I screwed the last one and got a B+. I believe I was ranked 2nd or 3rd before my last SAC.
Exam 1:40/40
Exam 2:80/80
If this is the case, have I made up for my last SAC?
What do you honestly think? :P
-
SAC average: B+ in very strong cohort
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 48/80
Study score?
-
SACs: All A+ until I screwed the last one and got a B+. I believe I was ranked 2nd or 3rd before my last SAC.
Exam 1:40/40
Exam 2:80/80
If this is the case, have I made up for my last SAC?
What do you honestly think? :P
Haha...I just wanted to make sure. :) Thank you!
-
okay can you predict me a best case SS
Exam 1 38/40
Exam 2 72/80
Sacs i'm thinking B+ - A
teacher predicted 35-40 before the exam
thoughts?
thanks
-
okay can you predict me a best case SS
Exam 1 38/40
Exam 2 72/80
Sacs i'm thinking B+ - A
teacher predicted 35-40 before the exam
thoughts?
thanks
Higher...
-
okay can you predict me a best case SS
Exam 1 38/40
Exam 2 72/80
Sacs i'm thinking B+ - A
teacher predicted 35-40 before the exam
thoughts?
thanks
if ur sacs were a little higher that could have been ~43-44
-
okay can you predict me a best case SS
Exam 1 38/40
Exam 2 72/80
Sacs i'm thinking B+ - A
teacher predicted 35-40 before the exam
thoughts?
thanks
Higher...
Really?
the sacs are overestimated, im assuming theyll go up to something like this because i know our sacs are difficult compared to others schools.
and that is a best case scenario i think its probably more like
E1 36/40
E2 (69/70)/80
could i realistically get a 40 ?
-
SAC average: B+ in very strong cohort
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 48/80
Study score?
-
Exam 1: 35-36/40
Exam 2: 79/80
Sacs: Very strong cohort, around three/four people are sitting on 40/40 and 80/80
43+ possible?
-
bleh, sitting on mid A+ for sacs
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
-
SAC average: B+ in very strong cohort
Exam 1: 32/40
Exam 2: 48/80
Study score?
34...
-
Exam 1: 35-36/40
Exam 2: 79/80
Sacs: Very strong cohort, around three/four people are sitting on 40/40 and 80/80
43+ possible?
definitely, ur looking at 45+
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
-
damnn, low possibility of a 40?
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
The general consensus is that the A+ cutoff will be a lot lower this year. . .
-
damnn, low possibility of a 40?
id say so, your sacs are good :)
-
For question 4b,
I found the derivitive,
made it equal 0,
solved for x.
I only stupidly put down x=1/a and not the other equation.
Will I get 1 or 2 marks out of 3 for this question?? Thankyou!
-
damnn, low possibility of a 40?
4 shizz, the firstr exam mark is gonna be a low-mid A+. sedcond exam will be a mid-high A, if not very low A+, sacs should be A+...
id guess very min 38, max 41..
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
The general consensus is that the A+ cutoff will be a lot lower this year. . .
its never going to be lower than about 66..
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
The general consensus is that the A+ cutoff will be a lot lower this year. . .
its never going to be lower than about 66..
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33172.0.html
It was ~62 in 2007.
-
and i think its safe to say, this was harder than 07..
-
Realistically, do you guys think I will get 40? :(
SACS: Low-Mid A+ after scaling
Exam 1: 35-37/40 depending on how they give consequentials for cone question.
Exam 2: 67/40
Any opinions on whether or not I should redo if I get less than 40?
-
Realistically, do you guys think I will get 40? :(
SACS: Low-Mid A+ after scaling
Exam 1: 35-37/40 depending on how they give consequentials for cone question.
Exam 2: 67/40
Any opinions on whether or not I should redo if I get less than 40?
You'll get more than 50 if you got 67/40 for exam 2. :P
In all honestly, you should be able to get 40 fairly comfortably.
-
Maybe... you might scrape one.. if not, a 38.
-
Realistically, do you guys think I will get 40? :(
SACS: Low-Mid A+ after scaling
Exam 1: 35-37/40 depending on how they give consequentials for cone question.
Exam 2: 67/40
Any opinions on whether or not I should redo if I get less than 40?
im in pretty much the same boat as you score wise and i got a prediction of 39-40
if you are the type of person who gets bored with things easily then dont repeat it
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
The general consensus is that the A+ cutoff will be a lot lower this year. . .
its never going to be lower than about 66..
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33172.0.html
It was ~62 in 2007.
i like to belive the vcaa statistics are more credible. http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2007/section3/vce_specialist_maths_ga07.pdf
it was 68.5 in 2007 :)
-
how bout this..............
exam 1: 37/40
exam 2: 65/80
sacs: 90% in a strong cohort.
39+...
The general consensus is that the A+ cutoff will be a lot lower this year. . .
its never going to be lower than about 66..
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33172.0.html
It was ~62 in 2007.
i like to belive the vcaa statistics are more credible. http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2007/section3/vce_specialist_maths_ga07.pdf
it was 68.5 in 2007 :)
Thats specialist maths :P
-
^^ u just posted the spesh stats ;)
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2007/section3/vce_math_methods_cas_ga07.pdf
-
hahahahaha woooops :p
shows wat happens after vce....u simply forget how to read :p
sorry guys
-
hahahahaha woooops :p
shows wat happens after vce....u simply forget how to read :p
sorry guys
I guess 2010 has got to us :)
-
OMG SCARED ME THERE WITH THOSE STATISTICS. lol
-
exam 1 2/40
exam 2 30/40
wat ss??
-
sac C(65) exam1 25/40 exam2 42/80
-
sac C(65) exam1 25/40 exam2 42/80 would i get ss30?
thanks
-
sac C(65) exam1 25/40 exam2 42/80 would i get ss30?
thanks
yes i think u could
-
exam 1 22/40
exam 2 33/80
could i still get a 28?
-
please predict mine!!
sacs: 84/100 (screwed up really bad)
exam 1: 36/40
exam 2: 65/80
is it still possible to get a 38? pleasee help! thanks
-
Would it be safe to say around 67/68 would still be an A+?
-
My turn:
Sacs: 99/100 in a really, really, weak cohort.
Exam 1: 38/40
Exam 2: 68/80
-
My turn:
Sacs: 99/100 in a really, really, weak cohort.
Exam 1: 38/40
Exam 2: 68/80
41-43
-
Hey guys I'm really annoyed and full of frustration the hours I put into methods this year I was hoping for high 40s but I suppose life isn't fair wat would
High a+ in sacs
35 in exam 1
68-72 in exam 2
get me?
thx
-
SACS: A+
Exam 1: 39-40/40
Exam 2: 67-70/80 (massive range I know, maybe do one for 67 and one for 70?)
-
micaholic-39+
blakhitman-42-44 depending on exam two score..
-
Someone please predict mine! :]
Sacs: B+
If marked by evil assessors:
Exam 1: 20/40
Exam 2: 37/80
If marked by nice assessors:
Exam 1: 25/40
Exam 2: 44/80
What sort of study scores would I be looking at for both?? thanks
-
Predict for my friend :)
SACS: 60/100ish
Exam 1: Low 20s/40
Exam 2: Low 40s/80
-
predict my SS pls,
i got A+ for sacs
about 34 or 35 out of 40 for the first exam (mid-high A)
and i got mid A+ for the second exam
so what SS raw am i looking at?
-
predict my SS pls,
i got A+ for sacs
about 34 or 35 out of 40 for the first exam (mid-high A)
and i got mid A+ for the second exam
so what SS raw am i looking at?
40+
-
Hey guys I don't think mine was answered.
SACS: 100% (5 of us in my cohort got 100% but the rest are average).
E1: 35/40
E2: 76-77/80
-
Hey guys I don't think mine was answered.
SACS: 100% (5 of us in my cohort got 100% but the rest are average).
E1: 35/40
E2: 76-77/80
46-47- 48
depending upon A+ cutoff for exam 2,
-
Oh fuck yeah, thought E1 was going to hurt my chances of something big. The 35-40 was not including any possible consequential marks for the last question (except stating that dS/dR=0 which is worth one mark).
-
well, most likely you will get 2/5 for that question,
subbing in your value, and the equating derivative = to 0
but yeah if A+ is same as in 07 62.5 id say 47 or even 48
-
Hey guys. Predict me a score lol. Okay, sacs, 44 percent average. Exam one I predict about 38/40, but exam two about 60/60. Also, I'm pretty sure exam 1 was out of 37 which would mean I got full there. Thanks
-
Hey guys. Predict me a score lol. Okay, sacs, 44 percent average. Exam one I predict about 38/40, but exam two about 60/60. Also, I'm pretty sure exam 1 was out of 37 which would mean I got full there. Thanks
exam two is out of 80.
-
There was 4 modules, didn't we only had to do three? I ceebed doing the last module.
-
There was 4 modules, didn't we only had to do three? I ceebed doing the last module.
this is the methods board not further.
-
Want to predict mine XD
1. Sacs - B+ to A's
2. Exam 1 - 34/40
Exam 2 - 57/80
-
There was 4 modules, didn't we only had to do three? I ceebed doing the last module.
this is the methods board not further.
your point is sorry?
-
If anyone has the time and knowledge could you also give me an idea of a possible study score.
Math, as you will see, is a WEAK subject of mine but i need 25 for the course i want.
SACS = 100%, rank1, easy sacs and weak class,
Exam 1 ~ 21/40
Exam 2 ~ 47/80.
THANKYOU
-
It was a hard one
-
If anyone's not too busy, could they make an estimate with mine?
Sacs - 91%, top of my cohort by a bit, fairly weak cohort.
Exam 1 - ~33/40
Exam 2 - ~57/80
It would be much appreciated if you could help. :)
-
If anyone's not too busy, could they make an estimate with mine?
Sacs - 91%, top of my cohort by a bit, fairly weak cohort.
Exam 1 - ~33/40
Exam 2 - ~57/80
It would be much appreciated if you could help. :)
35-38 :S
-
If only one Can help
I Really want a score of around 25 And wondering if this can do
SAC = C
Exam 1 = 25/40
Exam 2 = 40/80
Help Appreciated
Th
-
If only one Can help
I Really want a score of around 25 And wondering if this can do
SAC = C
Exam 1 = 25/40
Exam 2 = 40/80
Help Appreciated
Th
Definitely more than 25, could be around 29-31
-
SAC: B+
Exam 1: 27-30/40
Exam 2: 33-36/80
so whats that
-
Thanks Vea
Thats a Load off my mind
-
hey guys i need a 35 raw for methods what scores would i need????
-
hey guys i need a 35 raw for methods what scores would i need????
Need a low A average, sorry I can't be more specific with the scores
-
What do you think one would need to get 45 raw for methods this yr, in terms of exam one and exam 2??? Any suggestions??
-
Hey guys, please help me out there. What do you think I will get with:
SACS: ~high B+/low A
EXAM 1: ~high B+
EXAM 2: ~mid B+
Thanks :)