ATAR Notes: Forum
Archived Discussion => 2010 => End-of-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Business Management => Topic started by: awesome2damax on November 12, 2010, 12:10:30 pm
-
MAN! IT IS SO BORING! totally regret it this year!
-
MAN! IT IS SO BORING! totally regret it this year!
And if you do get 49?...
-
Agree.
No offence.. but it's a horrible subject. D:
-
Yet it could be my saviour to going from 93 to 95 ATAR
-
The only reason anyone does it is because it's the highest score people get most of the time out of all their subjects (Hopefully that's not the case for me though :S)...And it's easy, i.e. confidence booster.. I don't think anyone could ever truly LOVE this subject. It was always boring, but then again, doing really well is good enough motivation to do it. Trust me though, most of you will be so happy you choose it when results come out.
-
I rekon its a good subject because you learn a lot about real life stuff and m well managing businesses lol..but yeah at times i wanted to crawl in a hole and die it was that boring
BUT ITS ALL OVER NOW WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
-
The only reason anyone does it is because it's the highest score people get most of the time out of all their subjects (Hopefully that's not the case for me though :S)...And it's easy, i.e. confidence booster.. I don't think anyone could ever truly LOVE this subject. It was always boring, but then again, doing really well is good enough motivation to do it. Trust me though, most of you will be so happy you choose it when results come out.
I did it cause I'm a Jew so I figured business would come to me naturally... jk it's just a mickey mouse subject is all. It's either this or psych
-
Its bullshit I didnt mind business until todayyyyyyyyyyyyyy. It just made me hate it. And vcaa must be laughing to all those who spent hours on end memorizing Kotter hahahahahahaha to those kids. including me:(
-
No, i enjoyed it all year.. Just the exam was crap!
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
No you would get 2 out of 10.
Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
No you would get 2 out of 10.
Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.
lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
No you would get 2 out of 10.
Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.
lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.
Whilst defining organisational change is important... you will not lose marks for not doing it ( i defined organisational change by the way).
1 mark for defining driving- 1 mark for few generic examples
1 mark for defining restraining- 1 mark for few generic examples
2 marks for introducing issue and defining e.g acquisitions... and explaining the issue etc...
2 marks for driving forces related to case study
2 marks for restraining forces related to case study
-
All the dud subjects seem to actually have purposes for real-life, whereas the hard, 'real' subjects don't really...i mean compare bm to spesh :)
BM is actually an alright subject, it's just disappointing that the exam didn't really test the full extent of the course...
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
No you would get 2 out of 10.
Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.
lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.
mate, never said it would give extra marks. Said it could be justified to put it in, but even when I put it in I didn't assume extra marks.
-
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....
No you would get 2 out of 10.
Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.
lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.
mate, never said it would give extra marks. Said it could be justified to put it in, but even when I put it in I didn't assume extra marks.
ok but from your posts earliar it seemed u believed kotter had to be included to get full marks in which it didnt, but i agree with the post u just posted
-
nah, I wrote only if you had finished and had extra time, may as well have. Let's just leave it.
-
nah, I wrote only if you had finished and had extra time, may as well have. Let's just leave it.
well im glad we finally agree, i think this question will mess alot of people up because people would have wrote about kotter to fill up the lines. i also finished early but instead of adding kotter onto my back page i went back and read over my work making sure it made sense and no spelling mistakes