ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Specialist Mathematics => Topic started by: Mao on May 23, 2008, 07:48:18 pm
-
yep
[18:43] <dcc> ok
[18:44] there is 250 litres of liquid in a tank, and 30 grams of salt (initially)
[18:44] <dcc> A solution is being pumped in at 9 L/min with a concentration of x g/L
[18:44] The solution is kept uniform by mixing and is pumped out at a rate of 13L/min
[18:44] Find Q, the amount of salt in the tank at time T
[18:45] assume x consant
differential equation:
equation A: 

let =\mbox{Exp}\left( \int \frac{13}{250-4t}\; dt \right) = \mbox{Exp}\left( -\frac{13}{4}\log_e (250-4t)\right) = (250-4t)^{-13/4})
\cdot Q = \int I(t)\cdot 9x \; dt)
^{-9/4}+C}{(250-4t)^{-13/4}} = x\cdot (250-4t)+C(250-4t)^{13/4}=2x(125-2t)+C(250-4t)^{13/4})
then solve for C using initial condition = VERY UGLY solution
-
(18:43:49) (dcc) there is 250 litres of liquid in a tank, and 30 grams of salt (initially)
(18:43:58) (Mao) dcc: is that the hardest?
(18:44:05) (dcc) A solution is being pumped in at 9 L/min with a concentration of x g/L
(18:44:19) (dcc) The solution is kept uniform by mixing and is pumped out at a rate of 13L/min
(18:44:31) (dcc) Find Q, the amount of salt in the tank at time T
(18:45:14) (dcc) assume x constant
-
x})}{\dfrac{W\left[-\left(1.68179 (125 -2t)^{3/4} \right.\right.\\<br />\left.\log_{e}\left[k |250 -4t|^{562\cdot5 x-9tx}\right]\right)}{<br />\left(3.90625\times 10^9 - 2.5\times 10^8 t+6.\times 10^6 t^2-64000t^3+256t^4\right)\right]}})
lol :P
-
(http://stuff.daniel15.com/cgi-bin/mathtex.cgi?Q%20=%20\dfrac{-\left.\left(1%20\cdot%20\log_{e}(k|250%20-%204t|^{2.25%20(250%20-4t)x})}{\dfrac{W\left[-\left(1.68179%20(125%20-2t)^{3/4}%20\right.\right.\\\left.\log_{e}\left[k%20|250%20-4t|^{562\cdot5%20x-9tx}\right]\right)}{\left(3.90625\times%2010^9%20-%202.5\times%2010^8%20t+6.\times%2010^6%20t^2-64000t^3+256t^4\right)\right]}}Q = \dfrac{-\left.\left(1 \cdot \log_{e}(k|250 - 4t|^{2.25 (250 -4t)x})}{\dfrac{W\left[-\left(1.68179 (125 -2t)^{3/4} \right.\right.\\\left.\log_{e}\left[k |250 -4t|^{562\cdot5 x-9tx}\right]\right)}{\left(3.90625\times 10^9 - 2.5\times 10^8 t+6.\times 10^6 t^2-64000t^3+256t^4\right)\right]}})
holy sweet mother.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_differential_equation#First_order_equation
-
x})}{\dfrac{W\left[-\left(1.68179 (125 -2t)^{3/4} \right.\right.\\<br />\left.\log_{e}\left[k |250 -4t|^{562\cdot5 x-9tx}\right]\right)}{<br />\left(3.90625\times 10^9 - 2.5\times 10^8 t+6.\times 10^6 t^2-64000t^3+256t^4\right)\right]}})
lol :P
MATHEMATICA EXPOSED!!!!! :P
-
wow. took me 3 days to do differntial equations... for just one exercise. i feel so stupid :(
-
I don't think youse will be required to solve these types of DEs in Spesh, you'll only have to be able to set them up afaik.
-
Note:
Is dt/dQ = f(Q) + constant the same as dQ/dt = 1/f(Q) + constant ?
Is
the same as
?
-
i told you dcc is evil
-
i told you dcc is evil
lol why is dcc evil. Is it because he's smarter than u :P
-
i told you dcc is evil
lol why is dcc evil. Is it because he's smarter than u :P
partially :P
also coz he keeps making poor mayo do long questions
-
Note:
Is dt/dQ = f(Q) + constant the same as dQ/dt = 1/f(Q) + constant ?
did you mean
or
?
the earlier would be true [even though some "real" mathematicians are against it], the latter will be false.
please learn how to use
:)
[and oh, i see what you mean now... yes, that's a big mistake =P ]
-
Note:
Is dt/dQ = f(Q) + constant the same as dQ/dt = 1/f(Q) + constant ?
It would be the same if it wasn't an initial value problem (i.e you didnt' have to find the constant), since c represents ANY arbitrary constant.
I THINK.
-
so what IS an easy way to determine how to put together a differential equation. because this has been the worst topic for me... i dunno where to start!!! :(
-
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
-
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
A colony of seals is declining in numbers so that there are "N" seals at the time "t" years. it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N". initially in the period of study there were 5000 seals in the colony but after 5 years, a 5% decline was noted. set up the differential equation and solve it, expressing "N" in terms of "t"
* wen it says proportional. am i right in saying:
dN/dt = -kN? where k is a constant?, and the -ve coz its a decline?
after this im stuck only because of the 5% thingy :D thanxs heaps!
-
yep so you have

you are given (when
) and using the 5% decline information you can get another set of data points (when
).
You need both sets since you need to find the constant of integration and the constant of proportionality
So;

and =0~and~t(5)=4750)
-
Another question
Is
?
-
Another question
Is
?
at first glance it doesn't look like it's right,
but at the time this question popped up, someone did assure me it was basically just the chain rule, and I did somehow manage to convince myself with some reasoning or other
so to be quite frank, I don't have a clue right now :P
-
Try with
.
-
Try with
.
i see what you mean.
-
yep so you have

you are given (when
) and using the 5% decline information you can get another set of data points (when
).
You need both sets since you need to find the constant of integration and the constant of proportionality
So;

and =0~and~t(5)=4750)
i dont exactly get how u just pluged numbers in. lol.
like where does the intergration and the flip of dN/dt come in? :(
??? lol
-
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
A colony of seals is declining in numbers so that there are "N" seals at the time "t" years. it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N". initially in the period of study there were 5000 seals in the colony but after 5 years, a 5% decline was noted. set up the differential equation and solve it, expressing "N" in terms of "t"
* wen it says proportional. am i right in saying:
dN/dt = -kN? where k is a constant?, and the -ve coz its a decline?
after this im stuck only because of the 5% thingy :D thanxs heaps!
firstly:
"it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N""
that is, rate of change of population
is negative (decline) and is proportional to N




at t=0, N=5000
 + c)
at t=5, N has dropped 5% =4750)
+c)
solving these two simultaneously will give the values for k and c, which you can then just sub in and rearrange :)
-
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
A colony of seals is declining in numbers so that there are "N" seals at the time "t" years. it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N". initially in the period of study there were 5000 seals in the colony but after 5 years, a 5% decline was noted. set up the differential equation and solve it, expressing "N" in terms of "t"
* wen it says proportional. am i right in saying:
dN/dt = -kN? where k is a constant?, and the -ve coz its a decline?
after this im stuck only because of the 5% thingy :D thanxs heaps!
firstly:
"it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N""
that is, rate of change of population
is negative (decline) and is proportional to N

is that the same as dN/dt = -kN? (like without the fishy sign?)
if it is. yeah ive gotten that so far. :) whats next?
-
[i do a lot of edits, that was a mistake i made in copy-pasta] :)
-
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
A colony of seals is declining in numbers so that there are "N" seals at the time "t" years. it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N". initially in the period of study there were 5000 seals in the colony but after 5 years, a 5% decline was noted. set up the differential equation and solve it, expressing "N" in terms of "t"
* wen it says proportional. am i right in saying:
dN/dt = -kN? where k is a constant?, and the -ve coz its a decline?
after this im stuck only because of the 5% thingy :D thanxs heaps!
firstly:
"it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N""
that is, rate of change of population
is negative (decline) and is proportional to N




at t=0, N=5000
 + c)
at t=5, N has dropped 5% =4750)
+c)
solving these two simultaneously will give the values for k and c, which you can then just sub in and rearrange :)
ok i get it up to t=0, N=5000.
but after that im kinda lost on how u get 3 on the last line
and like is something cut out after the 100? lol :s
-
is that the same as dN/dt = -kN? (like without the fishy sign?)
if it is. yeah ive gotten that so far. :) whats next?
ROFL @ "fishy sign" !! hehee :D
-
ok i get it up to t=0, N=5000.
but after that im kinda lost on how u get 3 on the last line
and like is something cut out after the 100? lol :s
yeah, it didn't like my % sign. fixed now.
-
[/tex][/tex]
well, do you have any specific problems in mind?
A colony of seals is declining in numbers so that there are "N" seals at the time "t" years. it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N". initially in the period of study there were 5000 seals in the colony but after 5 years, a 5% decline was noted. set up the differential equation and solve it, expressing "N" in terms of "t"
* wen it says proportional. am i right in saying:
dN/dt = -kN? where k is a constant?, and the -ve coz its a decline?
after this im stuck only because of the 5% thingy :D thanxs heaps!
firstly:
"it is assumed that the rate of decline is proportional to "N""
that is, rate of change of population
is negative (decline) and is proportional to N




at t=0, N=5000
 + c)
at t=5, N has dropped 5% =4750)
+c)
solving these two simultaneously will give the values for k and c, which you can then just sub in and rearrange :)
hummm ok. well so far my 2 simultaneous equations are
5=-1/k ln(4750)+ C
0=-1/k
it works out to be 5= -1/k ln(4750) + 1/k ln(5000)
therefore equals 5 = 1/k (ln(5000)/(4750)) ==> 5=1/k(ln(20/29))
k = 1/5 (ln(20/19))
subbed back in i get. 0= -5/ln(20/19) x ln(5000) + C
therefore C = 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
..... t = -5/ln (20/19) X Ln (N) + 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
am i CLOSE to correct? if so i sub t and find N? t=5?
btw how do u do the itergration sign and the devision things. coz my post looks like shit! lol :(
-
hummm ok. well so far my 2 simultaneous equations are
5=-1/k ln(4750)+ C
0=-1/k ln(5000)+ C
it works out to be 5= -1/k ln(4750) + 1/k ln(5000)
therefore equals 5 = 1/k (ln(5000)/(4750)) ==> 5=1/k(ln(20/29))
k = 1/5 (ln(20/19))
subbed back in i get. 0= -5/ln(20/19) x ln(5000) + C
therefore C = 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
..... t = -5/ln (20/19) X Ln (N) + 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
am i CLOSE to correct? if so i sub t and find N? t=5?
btw how do u do the itergration sign and the devision things. coz my post looks like shit! lol :(
ahh, i did make a stupid mistake [again]
typeset: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,3137.0.html
and yes, I think you are correct.
if we transpose 
})
substituting k and c
}{5}\cdot \left(t-\frac{5\cdot ln(5000)}{ln(20/19)}\right)})
}{5}t+ln(5000)})
}{5}t})
}\right)^{ -(t/5)})
-
hummm ok. well so far my 2 simultaneous equations are
5=-1/k ln(4750)+ C
0=-1/k ln(5000)+ C
it works out to be 5= -1/k ln(4750) + 1/k ln(5000)
therefore equals 5 = 1/k (ln(5000)/(4750)) ==> 5=1/k(ln(20/29))
k = 1/5 (ln(20/19))
subbed back in i get. 0= -5/ln(20/19) x ln(5000) + C
therefore C = 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
..... t = -5/ln (20/19) X Ln (N) + 5(ln(5000))/ln(20/19)
am i CLOSE to correct? if so i sub t and find N? t=5?
btw how do u do the itergration sign and the devision things. coz my post looks like shit! lol :(
ahh, i did make a stupid mistake [again]
typeset: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,3137.0.html
and yes, I think you are correct.
if we transpose 
})
substituting k and c
}{5}\cdot \left(t-\frac{5\cdot ln(5000)}{ln(20/19)}\right)})
wow..... ur like so smart!!! lol.... jee wish i could do it as easy as u :( but glad to hear i did something right. im actually gettin the kinda hang of differential equations :)
thanxs heaps!
will keep u posted on harder ones :P ;D
NOTE: ummmm am i meant to get 4750 as the answer once i sub t=5 in the last line????? coz i just did :'(
-
NOTE: ummmm am i meant to get 4750 as the answer once i sub t=5 in the last line????? coz i just did :'(
yes
^{t/5})
^1 = 4750)
-
NOTE: ummmm am i meant to get 4750 as the answer once i sub t=5 in the last line????? coz i just did :'(
yes
^{t/5})
^1 = 4750)
ok just checking :)
try this one out. i thought this was more related rates of change? how can it be done in differential equations form?
A sepherical ball of ice initially with a radius of 20cm , slowly melts so that the volume decreases at a constant rate of on
find an expression for
in terms of r where S
is the surface area and
-
ok just checking :)
try this one out. i thought this was more related rates of change? how can it be done in differential equations form?
A sepherical ball of ice initially with a radius of 20cm , slowly melts so that the volume decreases at a constant rate of on
find an expression for
in terms of r where S
is the surface area and
Yeah I think this one is just a related rates question, unless there's more parts to it.


We're told in the question that the volume is decreasing at a rate of
, i.e. 
Using this information we can now find
:

Deriving surface area equation:

We can now find
:
-
Find
given
and hence find the general solution to the differential equation ^2 + \left(x + y\right))
(not too difficult but a slightly interesting question none the less p.s. ahmad + adib stay away stealers)
-
Find
given
and hence find the general solution to the differential equation ^2 + \left(x + y\right))
(not too difficult but a slightly interesting question none the less p.s. ahmad + adib stay away stealers)


dx)

^2+\frac{3}{4}}=\int dx)
Let
then 



}{3}\right)+C = x+D)
+1)}{3}\right)+C = x+D)
where 
waaaaaaaaah
-


dx)

^2+\frac{3}{4}}=\int dx)
Let
then 



}{3}\right)+C = x+D)
+1)}{3}\right)+C = x+D)
where 
waaaaaaaaah
I love it! What an inspired substitution :P
another way of integrating that quadratic was making the substitution
and arctanning, but I like what you did :P
-
lol thanks dcc, I guess I just did a roundabout way of arctanning
-

dx)

naughty :P
-
need help!!....
A container with a conical shape has a height equal to the diameter of the top. Water is poured into the container at the rate of 20 L/min. if the depth is h cm after t mins, and the container was initially empty. express
in terms of h
i guessin
= 20 ?
but wat the? is next....
isant this related? how come i have it as a question relating to differential equations?
.xxx.
-
since
converting to common units (cm
/min);

and we are looking for 
and
(chain rule)
using knowledge of the volume of a cone; 
since
this means 
=> 
differentiating with respect to h; 
so 
subbing this into;
yields;

(20000 is used as h is in cm, and 1L = 1000 cm3)
Yeh, this is a related rates question.
(sorry if there are mistakes am hungover and tired)
-
wait, what's s?
altered :) sorry my typo
-
volume of a cone:





(20000 is used as h is in cm, and 1L = 1000 cm3)
-
LOL at phagist_
to smart Mao :P ;)
-
(sorry if there are mistakes am hungover and tired)
hehe :)
-
A way of solving the OP:
Let Q be the amount of salt in grams in the tank at time t.
.

 = 250 - 4t)

Firstly: 

Multiply through by:
^{-\frac{13}{4}})
and we get:
^{-\frac{13}{4}} Q' + 13\left(250 - 4t\right)^{-\frac{17}{4}}Q = 9 \left(250 - 4t\right)^{-\frac{13}{4}})
^{-\frac{13}{4}}Q \right]' = 9 \left(250 - 4t\right)^{-\frac{13}{4}})
Therefore by the fundamental theorem of calculus:
^{-\frac{13}{4}} \cdot Q = \int \dfrac{9}{\left(250 - 4t\right)^\frac{13}{4}}\; dt = \left(250 - 4t\right)^{-\frac{9}{4}} + C )
^{\frac{13}{4}} \left( \dfrac{1}{\left(250 - 4t\right)^{\frac{9}{4}}} + C \right))
 + C\left(250 - 4t\right)^\frac{13}{4})
Using the initial condition Q(0) = 30g

 - \dfrac{220}{250^\frac{13}{4}} \cdot (250 - 4t)^\frac{13}{4})