ATAR Notes: Forum

Archived Discussion => 2008 => Mid-year exams => Exam Discussion => Victoria => Psychology => Topic started by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 09:03:19 am

Title: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 09:03:19 am
How did everyone go?

How did it compare to last year? Post your thoughts, questions and comments on the exam here.

If anyone has a copy of the exam, feel free to scan it on here when you get the chance  :)
Title: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 11:12:15 am
In my opinion was not as hard as I thought, however there were many questions which would of caught many people offguard.

such as sergio & the camouflaged door.

What did you people think? and how did you fair?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 11:37:58 am
i agree i didn't think it was as hard as i expected, actually it reminded me a lot of last years paper in terms of difficulty. 

i think (hope) i did alright considering the level of study i did.

what did people think about the speech one where the kids parasympathetic ns was activated. i found the wording a little confusing and had to read over it a few times.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 11:40:47 am
nah he
i agree i didn't think it was as hard as i expected, actually it reminded me a lot of last years paper in terms of difficulty. 

i think (hope) i did alright considering the level of study i did.

what did people think about the speech one where the kids parasympathetic ns was activated. i found the wording a little confusing and had to read over it a few times.

oh that one, he's sympathetic was activated, and 5 minutes INTO the speech what would still be active? OF COURSE SYMPATHETIC. para is activated AFTER the threat/whatever is dealt with dear.

but it could be both since, the boy calmed down..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:46:10 am
The hormones secreted by the sympathetic nervous system would still be lingering despite the boy calming down though.
Title: How did you find the exam?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 11:47:25 am
I know that i lost 1 mark on question 11 multiple choice, but pretty confident about the rest.

How did everyone find it and what did you find the hardest?

NO ILLUSIONS ON THE EXAM!!!!




Mod: Merged with current topic.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 11:48:44 am
I think i did reasonably ok. not as good as i SHOULD have done.

I did get confused with a few questions.

The one that really got me off guard was about Nick and the Polgyraph for GSR. Do you think it was required to mention the amplitidue og the polygraph when he was lying? Damn im pissed i messed up on that!

nah he
i agree i didn't think it was as hard as i expected, actually it reminded me a lot of last years paper in terms of difficulty. 

i think (hope) i did alright considering the level of study i did.

what did people think about the speech one where the kids parasympathetic ns was activated. i found the wording a little confusing and had to read over it a few times.

oh that one, he's sympathetic was activated, and 5 minutes INTO the speech what would still be active? OF COURSE SYMPATHETIC. para is activated AFTER the threat/whatever is dealt with dear.

but it could be both since, the boy calmed down..

But it stated that after he started talking he usually calmed down. If the child acknowleges that he can cope with the stress, then it ISNT a threat, so i think it would be parasympathetic, because he acknowleged that he was fine during the speech, only before he became nervous.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:50:55 am
Yeah it really depends on how the question was worded.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 11:52:29 am
I hate life.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 11:53:03 am
Ha ha. I feel that same way atm
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: thelovecatsx on June 12, 2008, 11:54:06 am
But it stated that after he started talking he usually calmed down. If the child acknowleges that he can cope with the stress, then it ISNT a threat, so i think it would be parasympathetic, because he acknowleged that he was fine during the speech, only before he became nervous.
I'm with you on this one.

Overall, I found it pretty good except for a few yucky questions.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:54:21 am


NO ILLUSIONS ON THE EXAM!!!!



Not at all? Not even in the multiple choice? How nice of VCAA lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 11:55:32 am
that exam should be thrown in the fire and laughed at!
no ames room saq, no muller-lyer, one question on gas and one on ethics

It wasn't even relevant!...hoping for a 89-90 now....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: thelovecatsx on June 12, 2008, 11:56:00 am
There was a few MCs on Ames Room. Nothing on Muller-Lyer however.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:57:08 am
that exam should be thrown in the fire and laughed at!
no ames room saq, no muller-lyer, one question on gas and one on ethics

It wasn't even relevant!...hoping for a 89-90 now....

It's not really surprising that the illusions didn't appear. They were given a good run last year in both SA and MC. I'm sure there must have been at least one Q in MC?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 11:57:25 am
Yeah it really depends on how the question was worded.

The question said that he clms down when he begins to speak and then it said 5 minutes after the speech started what is activated. It was the parasympathetic NS.

I think i got 85+ I hope..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 11:58:05 am
Gah, I had sleep-onset & sleep-maintenance insomnia last night.

Stupid stressors.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 11:58:20 am
No Muller Lyer :D Yay. i hate explaining how it works.

I cant even remember if there were any in the multiple choice.


What did everyone think about that Perceptual Set Question? I used Past Experience.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:58:46 am
Yeah it's parasympathetic for sure..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 11:59:05 am
The hormones secreted by the sympathetic nervous system would still be lingering despite the boy calming down though.

yer and the follow up question gave it away...somethng like 'what changes in the body might have ocured or whatever'...
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:59:53 am
I can't wait for someone to post the exam lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:00:35 pm
No Muller Lyer :D Yay. i hate explaining how it works.

I cant even remember if there were any in the multiple choice.


What did everyone think about that Perceptual Set Question? I used Past Experience.

There were 3 on the Ames ROom i think (multiple choice)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:01:20 pm
goddamn it. I wrote sympathetic...

I wrote context and said; that the aimbiguous figure could of had a context of at the beach.

if this was the case, then emma-lee or whatever her name, would be expecting to see a young woman rather than an old woman.

With Kevin if the context was at a bingo hall then, he would be expecting to see an old lady rather than a young woman.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:02:11 pm

What did everyone think about that Perceptual Set Question? I used Past Experience.

That was the one with the young woman/old woman pic yeah?
I said past experiece.. the girl perceived the young woman because she was young therefore spent lots of time with young women.
I said the guy could have worked in a nursing home, meaning he spends lots of time with old women.


Overall not a bad exam. But we'll have to see how they mark it!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 12:02:25 pm
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:03:07 pm
The floor of the Ames room is slanted, away from the peephole towards figure A. The answer was A
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Ashhh on June 12, 2008, 12:03:48 pm
I think i did reasonably ok. not as good as i SHOULD have done.

I did get confused with a few questions.

The one that really got me off guard was about Nick and the Polgyraph for GSR. Do you think it was required to mention the amplitidue og the polygraph when he was lying? Damn im pissed i messed up on that!

nah he
i agree i didn't think it was as hard as i expected, actually it reminded me a lot of last years paper in terms of difficulty. 

i think (hope) i did alright considering the level of study i did.

what did people think about the speech one where the kids parasympathetic ns was activated. i found the wording a little confusing and had to read over it a few times.

oh that one, he's sympathetic was activated, and 5 minutes INTO the speech what would still be active? OF COURSE SYMPATHETIC. para is activated AFTER the threat/whatever is dealt with dear.

but it could be both since, the boy calmed down..

But it stated that after he started talking he usually calmed down. If the child acknowleges that he can cope with the stress, then it ISNT a threat, so i think it would be parasympathetic, because he acknowleged that he was fine during the speech, only before he became nervous.


I think it was parasympathetic too.. the wording of that question was a bit difficult
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:04:02 pm
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
it does slant, it slants down from the peephole to position A

if you went to the melbourne musuem. you would of had a chance to experience an ames room typed room.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:04:08 pm
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".

It was option A I thought. only the floor slants
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 12:04:35 pm
The floor of the Ames room is slanted, away from the peephole towards figure A. The answer was A

Bugger, knew I got that one wrong.

BTW - wrote parasympathetic for the boy talking as well
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:05:04 pm
What did everyone think about the stage 4 sleep question?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 12:06:20 pm
The two characteristics I wrote were:

Very difficult to wake someone up in that stage.
If woken up, the person will experience post-awakening lag called sleep inertia.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:07:31 pm
Yeah I said Parasympathetic as well. And the associated changes could have been things such as return heart rate to normal, etc etc

And as for stage 4 sleep...
well obviously low freq high amp

and the 2 characteristics
deepest sleep, hard to wake up from!
and i said that it occurs towards the beginning of sleep, not at the end of it
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 12:08:53 pm
i said it slants down to figure b (on the left) because... shit, you were right. damn it! arghhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:08:57 pm
Yeah I said Parasympathetic as well. And the associated changes could have been things such as return heart rate to normal, etc etc

And as for stage 4 sleep...
well obviously low freq high amp

and the 2 characteristics
deepest sleep, hard to wake up from!
and i said that it occurs towards the beginning of sleep, not at the end of it

Thanks mel. I had the same as you.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:09:30 pm
meh i wrote, sleep walking and sleep talking can occur during this stage.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:10:03 pm
You could also say that periods of stage 3/4 sleep reduce as the night goes on, leading to greater time spent in REM.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:10:11 pm
phew i was stressing about the parasympathetic one...i said the RR rate would fall due to bronchi contracting in the lungs, and that HR would also fall
sleep - i said sleep phenomena can occur in that stage, and that it occurs less often as the night progresses
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 12:10:35 pm
i wrote

hard to wake up
and sleep phenomenon can occur, is that not right?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: thelovecatsx on June 12, 2008, 12:10:46 pm
What did everyone think about the stage 4 sleep question?
i put sleep phenomenon occurs and it's the deepest sleep, therefore being hardest to wake up from.
i'm thinking sleep phenomenon may have not been right.  :-\
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:12:08 pm
Yeah that's fine. It would have been best to specify though- sleep talking, walking and night terrors.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 12:12:39 pm
did anyone find it long?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 12:12:48 pm
You could also say that periods of stage 3/4 sleep reduce as the night goes on, leading to greater time spent in REM.

Damn i wrote that then put a line through my answer and changed it to Delta waves being dominant and sleep pehnomena,

Do you think they would consider my crossed out answer?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:13:26 pm
they don't always occur, but they can...so hopefully our answer was correct
what about the variables in the case study question? i said the results would be difficult to generalise to the wider population, but that was a guess and i'm not quite sure
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:13:53 pm
You could also say that periods of stage 3/4 sleep reduce as the night goes on, leading to greater time spent in REM.

Damn i wrote that then put a line through my answer and changed it to Delta waves being dominant and sleep pehnomena,

Do you think they would consider my crossed out answer?
I doubt it, but you've probably already provided enough to attain the marks anyway.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:15:02 pm
What was the experiment design??? (last question) I said independent groups design!!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:15:10 pm
i wrote the confounding variables could cause an unwanted effect.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:15:22 pm
Gosh from what I'm being told some of the MC were quite easy??
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:15:59 pm
What was the experiment design??? (last question) I said independent groups design!!!

Independent groups :D
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:16:10 pm
Most were
there were some dodgy one's though
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:17:20 pm
What was the experiment design??? (last question) I said independent groups design!!!

yeah i said that too, and that it prevents the placebo effect
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 12:17:30 pm
What was the experiment design??? (last question) I said independent groups design!!!

Independent groups :D

It said two experimental groups!!!!! So it confused me, but i said independent!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 12:17:43 pm
Gosh from what I'm being told some of the MC were quite easy??

I think it was VERY clear which answers were OBVIOUSLY wrong. Lets put it that way.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:18:33 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:19:17 pm
Most were
there were some dodgy one's though

Question 14 had me stumped.
About which is the sympathetic NOT dominant over.
I had it down to Increase in Salivation and Relaxation of Lungs etc...
I put the salivation one in the end, when there was about 20 seconds left!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:19:54 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:19:58 pm
Which nervous system has the subgroups
Sympathetic and Parasympathetic..

anyone?

*sarcasm*
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 12:20:39 pm
Most were
there were some dodgy one's though

Question 14 had me stumped.
About which is the sympathetic NOT dominant over.
I had it down to Increase in Salivation and Relaxation of Lungs etc...
I put the salivation one in the end, when there was about 20 seconds left!


I wrote relaxation of airways.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:21:24 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

it was just one of the multiple choice ones - i said it was caused by damage to the right parietal lobe
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:21:40 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

It was only a Multiple Choice, asking which lobe and hemisphere it would occur. And it didnt say neglect syndrome. It said damage to what area of the brain would result in neglecting the left side of the body...
or soemthing like that
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:22:32 pm
Most were
there were some dodgy one's though

Question 14 had me stumped.
About which is the sympathetic NOT dominant over.
I had it down to Increase in Salivation and Relaxation of Lungs etc...
I put the salivation one in the end, when there was about 20 seconds left!


I wrote relaxation of airways.

I'm pretty sure it was salivation, because when you are aroused and what not, your mouth goes all dry.
And your airways dilate to let more in, so that WOULD be controlled by sympathetic.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 12:23:38 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

 why shouldnt they test it?


it was pretty easy anyways
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 12:25:00 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

It was only a Multiple Choice, asking which lobe and hemisphere it would occur. And it didnt say neglect syndrome. It said damage to what area of the brain would result in neglecting the left side of the body...
or soemthing like that

whether it said it or not, the question was still basically about neglect syndrome
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 12:27:26 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

It was only a Multiple Choice, asking which lobe and hemisphere it would occur. And it didnt say neglect syndrome. It said damage to what area of the brain would result in neglecting the left side of the body...
or soemthing like that

whether it said it or not, the question was still basically about neglect syndrome

So was it Parietal or Frontal?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:27:49 pm
Parietal - right hemisphere
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 12:28:14 pm
Parietal. Because a function of the Parietal Lobe is Kinestisia.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 12:29:01 pm
Damn! I had parietal at first but considered that the motor cortex was in the frontal lobe and since the body was neglected I pictured it as not moving so I chose frontal.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:29:55 pm
Its not about not being able to move the body, its not being aware that its there.
parietal is responsible for position etc...
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:30:28 pm
and there was a question about neglect syndrome
Serious? Teachers will be really pissed about that. They shouldn't have been allowed to test that.

 why shouldnt they test it?


it was pretty easy anyways

Because under the old study design, "neglect syndrome" was an actual dot point and it was taken off under the new design.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:31:55 pm
It still has to do wiht the function of the lobes though doesnt it?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:34:24 pm
True, it's related to the lobes but it would be unwise of them to test the knowledge using the actual term "neglect syndrome".
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:40:17 pm
does anyone have a copy of the exam?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:40:46 pm
I second that statement lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:45:26 pm
Mmmm when we got out of our exam, our teachers had a copy of the exam, that they had answered while we were in the exam!
I was too scared to go through it though!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 12:46:25 pm
Hopefully someone will turn up with a copy lol. I really want to go through it.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: porsca911 on June 12, 2008, 12:51:09 pm
The exam was SOO easy! I think i did awesomely.. although i didn't get one mark for that 'what type of groups design is this' near the end. But it's fair cos i didn't really know them. I'm excited tho.. it was SO easy and i'm quite confident a lot of people did really well... not that that's really a good thing tho :S
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 12:52:04 pm
you mean exam
your lucky there was only one mention of research designs :D there have been heaps in past exams
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 12:52:20 pm
TIME TO BURN MY NOTES!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 12:54:51 pm
I'm keeping my notes :D seems like SUCH a waste!
Plus my posters make my bedroom look awesomely colourful!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 01:01:08 pm
im going to burn them.

ive written like 976978439978678 pages


we should all get together and have a HUGE bonfire :D

our stupid teacher didn't work out any answers, he just 'looked over it'
but he is a crap teacher, maybe he couldn't answer them, ha.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 01:08:15 pm
it was SO easy and i'm quite confident a lot of people did really well... not that that's really a good thing tho :S
Why is that not a good thing?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 01:15:45 pm
Any estimates for the A+ cut off?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 01:17:40 pm
for stage 4 characterisitics i had
- more than 50% delta waves are present
- the lowering of physiological responses such as heart rate and body temperature ? lol

umm for question 3in short answer about the case study, i didnt really get it and i wrote part a that is "conclusions cannot be drawn to the wider population" is this correct lol?

hated the one about gsr and the polygraph aarggh

bring on august 4th lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 01:18:04 pm
Any estimates for the A+ cut off?

yeah i would like to know that too
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 01:21:41 pm
Im guessing 156/180.... Thats about a loss of 12 marks
Get that on both exams and your looking towards a 38 raw

Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 12, 2008, 01:25:52 pm
Quote from: sisqo1111 link=topic=3788.msg44792#msg44792 date=1213240660

hated the one about gsr and the polygraph aarggh
[/quote


Tell  me about it. I stuffed up on that the most. What did you end up writing? did you mention control and relevant questions.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 01:28:45 pm
Mm control and relevent questions would be the distinguishing factor between his GSR.
So it would be that the GSR was significantly higher in response to relevent questions rather than the non-emotional control questions that give the baseline response.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Jurples on June 12, 2008, 01:55:45 pm
The exam was pretty easy except for a few :D  questions.. I had trouble with that (para)sympathetic speech one
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: nickalaz on June 12, 2008, 02:00:17 pm
Im guessing 156/180.... Thats about a loss of 12 marks
Get that on both exams and your looking towards a 38 raw



what an absolute load of vomit
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: enwiabe on June 12, 2008, 02:08:22 pm
nickalaz, I'm going to warn you now because you're stepping dangerously close to the line. Trolls are not tolerated on this forum. Consider this your first and final warning.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:12:58 pm
Quote from: sisqo1111 link=topic=3788.msg44792#msg44792 date=1213240660

hated the one about gsr and the polygraph aarggh
[/quote


Tell  me about it. I stuffed up on that the most. What did you end up writing? did you mention control and relevant questions.

i said that due to an increased in his electrical conductivity of his skin, his arousal responses would have been higher, leading the poilce to believe that he was lying. i didnt mention control or relevant questions :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:19:47 pm
did anyone know what the answer to question 11 was. about the showing brain activity over time. i picked mri and frmi. but my teacher said it would have been pet and mri
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 02:23:14 pm
surely it would have been PET and fMRI, as MRI doesnt show activity.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:24:15 pm
oh ok then.
so anyone have an idea about the a+ range?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: username on June 12, 2008, 02:25:53 pm
The last question was Independent Groups design. I thought the psychology exam was overall easy, however I think the thing that got people was the time we had to complete it in.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: nickalaz on June 12, 2008, 02:27:11 pm
it IS an absolute load of vomit that you can get straight A+'s all year and then get 38
vomit vomit vomit
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:27:17 pm
what do you mean? as in enough time or not enough? i finished at 10.10 lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 02:28:33 pm
yeah i thought there was ample time to finish the exam in.
plenty of time to go over and correct my stupid mistakes!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:30:12 pm
im worried now that i didnt do as well as i thought after reading this thread :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 02:31:13 pm
it IS an absolute load of vomit that you can get straight A+'s all year and then get 38
vomit vomit vomit
Troll...
You can get a 37 with A+'s... It just depends where there a high A+ or a low A+
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 02:32:28 pm
im worried now that i didnt do as well as i thought after reading this thread :(

same here! felt good after it and then i've come on here and lowered what i think i'll get from 88is to 80 LOL....dam geniuses
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:33:23 pm
yeh me too. everyone is talking about things that i didnt put in my answers but i knew them aarggh
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 02:40:14 pm
Yeah, it will be interesting to see how it is all marked, as there was some ambiguity in some of the questions.
I'm just glad its done with now :) nothing we can do to change it!!
Just ace the end of year :D
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:45:23 pm
could i just ask, the question that asked use a relevant gestalt principle. i picked similarity, so he could make them the same colour and then they would look alike or something along the lines of that.
was this correct? or was it only figure ground? because the question implied that there was more than 1 correct answer lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 02:47:27 pm
yeah i was really confidant until i came on here :)

is it just me or has there been this sudden increase in people joining vce ntoes???
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: nickalaz on June 12, 2008, 02:49:07 pm
well actually, i know somebody first hand that got
an A on the midyear, A on the end of year, got 39 raw
2007
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 02:49:38 pm
could i just ask, the question that asked use a relevant gestalt principle. i picked similarity, so he could make them the same colour and then they would look alike or something along the lines of that.
was this correct? or was it only figure ground? because the question implied that there was more than 1 correct answer lol

Yeah aslong as you justified it well, then similarity could have been accepted.  I asked my teacher about that one afterwards.

I said figure ground though, as that is the principle that is involved with camoflauge..
but depending on how you explained your answer then it could have been right.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 02:50:16 pm
could i just ask, the question that asked use a relevant gestalt principle. i picked similarity, so he could make them the same colour and then they would look alike or something along the lines of that.
was this correct? or was it only figure ground? because the question implied that there was more than 1 correct answer lol

Similarity and figure ground will be accepted, as they could both work. I did similarity aswell.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:50:46 pm
i think i would have done ok lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 02:52:33 pm
I didnt make reference to control and relevant questions, but i spoke about the increase in conductivity??? Will that be ohk or not full marks?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 02:54:40 pm
it depends how you said it?
I;m not sure if saying
"an increase in GSR would indicate he is lying" because thats not clearly specifying what the increase was in relation to.
It all depends on your explanation
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:56:20 pm
does anyone remember the one about emma jane and krik. i wrote one factor would be age, cause i thought that past experience would not have been one.
i hope i was right. does anyone know this is right :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 02:57:42 pm
I didnt make reference to control and relevant questions, but i spoke about the increase in conductivity??? Will that be ohk or not full marks?

thats what i said, but i think i explained it ok lol so hopefully full marks lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 03:00:00 pm
does anyone remember the one about emma jane and krik. i wrote one factor would be age, cause i thought that past experience would not have been one.
i hope i was right. does anyone know this is right :(

I'm not sure about age:S

i know it could have accepted past exp. and context.
so say they saw the pic when they were in the company of either young women or old women would have been context,
and past experience, the girl could be young and have lots of young friends, thus exposed to many young women, increasing her likelihood of perceiving it in that particular way!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 03:01:53 pm
i was going to say that.
but i thought it was wrong :( cant i go back in time? lol

does anyone know if they will accept age?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 03:04:29 pm
i was going to say that.
but i thought it was wrong :( cant i go back in time? lol

haha yesss i wish i could go back in time as well! so i could study up a bit more on arousal!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 03:07:06 pm
hopefully they accept age as a factor lol.
i wrote as emma jane may have been young she would have seen it as a women and kirk to be old and see it as an old lady
haha
please let them except it haha
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 03:10:42 pm
i said it was past experience, but maybe my explanation talked about context and experience lol.

mannnnnnnn long wait till august.


i think they should have a room joined to each exam room with examiners ready to mark out papers and we get our marks in like an hour :) . in my dreams.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 03:11:58 pm
yeah i was really confidant until i came on here :)

is it just me or has there been this sudden increase in people joining vce ntoes???

second that lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 03:52:15 pm
question 15 of the multis about broca's what did everyone put?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 03:56:02 pm
what was the actual question
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 03:58:20 pm
damage to broca's area would result in....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 03:59:22 pm
hopefully they accept age as a factor lol.
i wrote as emma jane may have been young she would have seen it as a women and kirk to be old and see it as an old lady
haha
please let them except it haha

I think it could only be past experience or context..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 03:59:51 pm
something about speaking and thinking?

is that the one?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 04:01:24 pm
i was expecting the illusions 100% lol!!!! But it was good that they did not come up
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 04:02:07 pm
something about speaking and thinking?

is that the one?

Yeh thats it. isaid his speech would be understandable but be interrpted by stuttering..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: simon289556 on June 12, 2008, 04:02:27 pm
goddamn it. I wrote sympathetic...

I wrote context and said; that the aimbiguous figure could of had a context of at the beach.

if this was the case, then emma-lee or whatever her name, would be expecting to see a young woman rather than an old woman.

yeah i said that the girl went to a all girls school so she saw mostly young women.
but the guy (kirk i think) worked at a aged care facility so mostly saw old women.
that was the only SA question that i was a little uncertain about. it confused me wanting an example for both, badly worded/

With Kevin if the context was at a bingo hall then, he would be expecting to see an old lady rather than a young woman.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Hughie on June 12, 2008, 04:06:17 pm
something about speaking and thinking?

is that the one?

Yeh thats it. isaid his speech would be understandable but be interrpted by stuttering..

a or c then?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 04:07:00 pm
i didnt choose the stuttering one i dont think, what were the other options?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: nickalaz on June 12, 2008, 04:09:44 pm
make sense - slow and deliberate
nonsense - something about nouns and verbs
make sense - stuttering
nonsense - something about 'a' and 'the'
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 04:11:57 pm
mm i said makes sense but is slow and deliberate
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 04:16:51 pm
i said make sense slow and deliberate,
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 04:17:00 pm
mm i said makes sense but is slow and deliberate


What does the 'deliberate' bit mean?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 04:19:39 pm
They dont deliberately do it and thats why i said B
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 04:20:10 pm
like... theyr careful about it, and heavy on the pronounciation of words. like it kinda sounds forced
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: cathtacular on June 12, 2008, 04:25:37 pm
they do deliberately do it.

Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jess on June 12, 2008, 04:28:23 pm
this has made me alot less confident lol

i guess we all just have to wait untill august

ew
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: ilovesuck on June 12, 2008, 04:32:00 pm
slow and deliberate..

anyways, exam was okay. i think it can be comparable to last years difficulty, however, some questions would have definitely caught some students off guard (eg ames room floor MC, GSR question, stage door camouflage etc)

i finished in about 50 minutes or so, so time wasnt really a factor (reading time helped alot, i must say.  never did reading time for prac exams :P)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: anonymous12 on June 12, 2008, 04:40:35 pm
For the Brocas question
So 100% the answer is slow and deliberate? Cause my teacher thinks otherwise, C.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 04:41:15 pm
Your teacher is wrong :D
Using the process of elimination (and logic), that is the only thing it can be
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 04:51:50 pm
the short answer question in relation to what type of research design is it?
what was it? independent? but it is said 2 experimental groups....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 04:54:25 pm
the short answer question in relation to what type of research design is it?
what was it? independent? but it is said 2 experimental groups....


Yh i noticed that.. i said independent groups design..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 05:01:27 pm
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 05:03:58 pm
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


Yeh thats fine i think..
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 05:06:06 pm
Question... Define Consciousness

A) Selective, Continuous, Changing
B) Selective, Objective, CHanging
C) Selective, Objective, Subjective
D) Selective, Subjective, Changing
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: username on June 12, 2008, 05:06:31 pm
A
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 05:07:55 pm
A for sure
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Amnesiac on June 12, 2008, 05:09:36 pm
thats a no brainer. but i think its safe to say that the friggin VCAA didn't think some of the questions through... i mean, some of the multi choice could definately have more than one answer... all i know is that i f*ckin nailed the question about Nicks GSR reading. i gave myself i good pat on the back for it, hahaha
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 05:10:05 pm
sweet, got it right....
No mistakes spotted so far; Hopefully I only lost 8 marks in total
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Amnesiac on June 12, 2008, 05:11:20 pm
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


i wrote those answers as well except i said:

physiological responses are at their lowest
minimal or no eye movements in the individual.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 05:12:20 pm
I said:
Over 50% Delta Waves
Night Terrors may occur


I'm unsure if the no rapid eye movement characteristic will count because its also a characteristic for every other NREM stage...
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jess3254 on June 12, 2008, 05:12:57 pm
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


Yeah, that's pretty much what I wrote. Stage 4 is characterised by:
-Limited eye movement
-Any physiological response is low. (something like that)
(and generally delta-waves)

As for the exam, I was extremely happy! :) Didn't find it too difficult. A nice contrast to yesterday's exam! Our class had an end of unit 3 party after the exam ;D it was fun.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jess on June 12, 2008, 05:13:34 pm
in the 2005 exam i think... there was like 4 MC that had more then one correct answer

maybe it will be the same with this
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jess3254 on June 12, 2008, 05:15:38 pm
in the 2005 exam i think... there was like 4 MC that had more then one correct answer

maybe it will be the same with this

You have an awesome name! :P
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 05:16:50 pm
a short answer in visual perception....
height in the visual field..... markets n stalls
what did people write for that one?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: KeyMan on June 12, 2008, 05:23:20 pm
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 05:27:53 pm
I wrote for Relative Size: The market shops and the shoppers near the front of the image would produce a larger retinal image then those who are further away (who would produce a smaller retinal image)

For Height in the Visual Field: The market shops and the shoppers who are the most distant would be painted closer to the horizon, and the ones who are the least distant are closer towards the front of the image
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 05:29:08 pm
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.

what i wrote was really similar to yours...although i'm not sure how clearly i expressed myself :S
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 05:31:07 pm
for 2 characterisits of stage 4 sleep.... r these correct answers?
lowest physiological responses in any stage of sleep
no rapid eye movement


Yeah, that's pretty much what I wrote. Stage 4 is characterised by:
-Limited eye movement
-Any physiological response is low. (something like that)
(and generally delta-waves)

As for the exam, I was extremely happy! :) Didn't find it too difficult. A nice contrast to yesterday's exam! Our class had an end of unit 3 party after the exam ;D it was fun.

where was my invite? I do unit 3 too :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 05:39:50 pm
you did unit 3. it's over!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sonnypls on June 12, 2008, 05:44:26 pm
hate life.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jonny on June 12, 2008, 05:48:01 pm
The Sykoloji was really easy, only problem is that the examiners will have to take marks off for really small and petty things to make an even spread because the stkoloji section of vcaa arent smart enough to realise that a harder exam will produce an even spread without the need of taking marks off for things that dont measure your knowledge, for example: im assuming they will take marks off for the sergio painter question if u did not make any reference to the actual door and the wall and what ever and you merely stated that "the contour of a figure is not noticeable thus the figure is harder to separate from the ground"
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: amyminchin on June 12, 2008, 06:24:54 pm
I liked that exam :) it was nice.
I think I did fairly well... the multiple choice=easy. Except stupid Ames Room.  >:( but alas.


I said expectation for the ambigous figure one- emma jane had been told she was seeing a pic of a young woman and kirk had been told that the pic was an ambiguous pic so he looked for the old woman.

Age isn't a factor in the perceptual set is it? Isn't it only context, past experience, expectation and something else... maybe it is age? I dont know.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: jonny on June 12, 2008, 06:36:41 pm
i dont think you can say age itself, you must elaborate and say that the older woman will hang around next to older ppl and so she will ahve a readiness to perceive the figure as an old lady cause of that. something like that maybe
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: amyminchin on June 12, 2008, 06:49:45 pm
Yeah. Did eeryone else find it uber short? I finsihed with like half an hour to spare and spent it annotating my question answer booklet (multiple choice section) with things like "kryptonite. lol. limitations- can't administer PET scan to superman" and such things while double checking everysingle question in the book. I made a stupid mistake in my prac exam (psychological/physiological. GAH!) so i looked over it abotu tne time for such mistakes.

Good luck for the GAT tomoz!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: extra-UNcool on June 12, 2008, 07:21:58 pm
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.

omg. i heard that mark was worth 4 marks!!! i think we were meant to talk about the stalls AND the people in both or something. how else would you get 4 marks from that. i'm doooooomned >_<
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Busy P on June 12, 2008, 07:23:02 pm
im glad there was no shit on the muller-lyer i hate that shit
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 07:39:59 pm
I wrote:

Relative size = "The painter could paint two adults in the painting, having one bigger than the other. We would expect both adults to be roughly the same size but the one that casts a larger image on the retina will be perceived as being closer than the one that casts a smaller image on the retina"

Height in the visual field = "The painter could paint one stall closer to the horizon and one further. The stall closer to the horizon will be perceived as being further away and the stall further away from the horizon will be perceived as closer"

I hate short answers, I know the answer but I can never word it correctly.

omg. i heard that mark was worth 4 marks!!! i think we were meant to talk about the stalls AND the people in both or something. how else would you get 4 marks from that. i'm doooooomned >_<

Maybe it is ur explanation of how it applies to the picture 1 mark for each and how you explain it e.g. closer to the horizon.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 08:19:26 pm
By the sounds of what you guys have been saying (I haven't actually seen the exam yet) I reckon the A+ range will be about 160-180.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: anonymous12 on June 12, 2008, 08:50:07 pm
QUESTION

For that relative size and height in visual field question. I forgot to give an example when explaining height in visual field, like drawing stalls closer to the horizon, but I mentioned "he can paint objects closer to the horizon, which will be perceived further away than object painted further away from the horizon". Will I lose a mark?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 08:56:49 pm
QUESTION

For that relative size and height in visual field question. I forgot to give an example when explaining height in visual field, like drawing stalls closer to the horizon, but I mentioned "he can draw objects closer to the horizon, which will be perceived further away than object drawn further away from the horizon". Will I lose a mark?

i think you'd probably need to relate it to an example to get a mark - but maybe a more lenient examiner will mark your paper and give you a mark anyway
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: thelovecatsx on June 12, 2008, 08:58:29 pm
QUESTION

For that relative size and height in visual field question. I forgot to give an example when explaining height in visual field, like drawing stalls closer to the horizon, but I mentioned "he can draw objects closer to the horizon, which will be perceived further away than object drawn further away from the horizon". Will I lose a mark?
I did the same thing. I'm hoping for a mark but I've got a feeling I've lost a few easy ones.  :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 08:59:32 pm
Like moshi said, a more discerning and strict marker won't give you the mark, while a more lenient marker will give you the mark.

It depends on your luck in that regard I suppose.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 09:03:55 pm
i have no clue about how the grades are worked out but im wondering wat did i need to score out of 90 to get an A
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: anonymous12 on June 12, 2008, 09:09:38 pm
Sounds fair enough.
What were your answers to the question regarding the GSR and polygraph? I've never seen how a GSR graph looks like in my life.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:11:03 pm
i have no clue about how the grades are worked out but im wondering wat did i need to score out of 90 to get an A


check out the grade distributions from the last few years, here's the 2007 one:
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2007/section3/vce_psychology_ga07.pdf
they vary slightly from year to year
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 09:12:08 pm
Last year you needed between 147-156. That means would would need somewhere between 73 and 78 out of 90 for an A last year. I think the cut off will be slightly higher this year though.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:13:17 pm
Sounds fair enough.
What were your answers to the question regarding the GSR and polygraph? I've never seen how a GSR graph looks like in my life.

i haven't seen one either, but i said something along the lines of, the assumption of using the polygraph as a lie detector is that lying produces high physiological responses to questions (i forgot to specify RELEVANT questions) :(, and that since Nick was in an aroused state, his skin's resistance to the electrical current would have been lowered
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: clau.diia on June 12, 2008, 09:14:07 pm
I drew a picture but I didn't say what he should draw? I really doubt you were supposed to though. I mean it's saying how he can create DEPTH in the painting not what he should draw in it....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: clau.diia on June 12, 2008, 09:15:01 pm
Moshi that's right by the way
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:17:28 pm
cool thanks  :)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 09:19:37 pm
It's nice to know that "Nick" appeared on the exam this year LOL.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:24:20 pm
lol as soon as i saw 'nick' my thoughts switched to this psych forum and i was momentarily distracted
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 09:25:42 pm
lol as soon as i saw 'nick' my thoughts switched to this psych forum and i was momentarily distracted

hahahaha that's gold!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 09:28:03 pm
moshi, wat was the research design for the last question, u seem like a smart man
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: clau.diia on June 12, 2008, 09:30:08 pm
Independent Research Design...or something like that..

I stuffed that up because my teacher didn't even bother going through it for more than a second.

I want a new psych teacher =(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:30:16 pm
lol by the way mskwmskw, i'm a girl  ;)
i opted for 'independent groups design'
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 09:30:57 pm
sorry moshi, thanks, i sed tht too, im just hearing mixed responses thou
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:36:53 pm
sorry moshi, thanks, i sed tht too, im just hearing mixed responses thou


thats alright - what did you put for the second part of the question?
my neck's sore from having to turn around 180 degrees just to check the time - i was one of the people in the classroom instead of the main hall, and was facing the back of the classroom where there was no clock attached! i'm definitely bringing a watch next time =="
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: clau.diia on June 12, 2008, 09:37:43 pm
My teacher didn't bother finishing the course until like a week before the exam. One day she was away to drive the school bus. The week before that she was away for a week for who knows what. Both our sacs were in our last lesson before the exam.

It's only one mark i guess but it annoys me that she didn't prepare us properly.

Overall the exam seemed pretty easy though.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 09:44:13 pm
well moshi, the 2nd part of the answer was in relation to the single blind procedure, i sed tht it elimantes particiapants expections or actions tht may afffect the experiment in an unwanted way n consquently impacting on the results.....
one last question about the speech question....
parasympathetic nervous system...
brings the body back to a state of homeostatis, therefore decresed heart rate
and
decreased persiparation because the the bodys level of arousal is dropping therefore the body does not need ot be cooled off as much 
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:47:03 pm
yeah that's probably right - im not sure how to explain perspiration, but what you wrote sounds reasonable
for the second part i said it helps to avoid the placebo effect, but now i'm not so sure
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 09:52:21 pm
u wood be rite, im not the best at psych, i wood love to get an A
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 09:55:19 pm
your answers have seemed to be pretty good so far, so you'll probably get there (:
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: mskwmskw on June 12, 2008, 10:11:12 pm
moshi, im about to hit the hay but b4 i go one last thing, wat did u say about the lady looking at her hand, cant exactly remember the question.....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 10:13:07 pm
retinal disparity, due to the 6-7cm difference between her eyes
and for the second part of the question, i think you could have written any of the binocular cues, so i chose convergence
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 10:13:57 pm
moshi, im about to hit the hay but b4 i go one last thing, wat did u say about the lady looking at her hand, cant exactly remember the question.....


Retinal disparity.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 10:20:22 pm
I did convergence, it could be either one
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 10:23:37 pm
so no one has the exam?
to upload? lol

im hoping for an a+ :( hopefully i get it
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 10:25:38 pm
were allowed to take copies if we ask the teachers, but no1 did for psych
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 10:31:08 pm
were allowed to take copies if we ask the teachers, but no1 did for psych

How devastating lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 10:38:59 pm
moshi, im about to hit the hay but b4 i go one last thing, wat did u say about the lady looking at her hand, cant exactly remember the question.....


Retinal disparity.

Did we actually have to say retinal disparity? Because the question just asked why her hand cast different images...
so i just said because the retinas are 6-7cm apart, a different picture is cast onto each one

:S

Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 10:40:58 pm
moshi, im about to hit the hay but b4 i go one last thing, wat did u say about the lady looking at her hand, cant exactly remember the question.....


Retinal disparity.

Did we actually have to say retinal disparity? Because the question just asked why her hand cast different images...
so i just said because the retinas are 6-7cm apart, a different picture is cast onto each one

:S



I would say so, given that retinal disparity is the principle you are explaining. It probably wouldn't matter though if you answered in enough detail.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 10:41:32 pm
it didn't actually ask, i just put it in case the examiners are fussy
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Busy P on June 12, 2008, 10:45:06 pm
I drew a picture but I didn't say what he should draw? I really doubt you were supposed to though. I mean it's saying how he can create DEPTH in the painting not what he should draw in it....

you're 100% right.. it doesn't say in the questions please give an example of what the artist could draw i.e stalls. You just had to say how he could show depth and distance.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 12, 2008, 10:46:38 pm
It only stated why it occurs, so i dont think u had to specifically say it, just explain it.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 10:50:53 pm
phew :) i got heaps worried for a sec!
i'm still so pumped to be finished!
yuck for the GAT tomorrow tho!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: ilovesuck on June 12, 2008, 10:55:33 pm
omg...

i put down  parasympathetic nervous system for the boy public speaking

and i wrote about the sympathetic nervous system physiological effects!!!!
sogjasdofjaiowmjksadmfk

i mustve read the question wrong!!11

omggawoejklsd;jciowajckasd;jcawei4fgnmwafij

how many marks was that anyway? ugh
cant believe it <_<
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 10:56:52 pm
i think maybe 3? or 2. didnt think it was a 4
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 10:57:06 pm
i think it was 3 marks all up
including the answer
so u'll at least get the one for parasympathetic:)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 10:57:20 pm
3 altogether: one for the nervous system, two for the physiological effects
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 10:57:41 pm
even if i get a low a+ ill be happy haha.
hopefully i got top in my school as i am ranked number 1
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 10:59:11 pm
oh yeah, and about the brocas one, was it defiently a?
i put down c? hopefully it was one where more than 1 answer was correct lol, like from past exams
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: ilovesuck on June 12, 2008, 10:59:33 pm
omgoshhhh 2 marks <_<

and i even checked over it and thought iw as still correct......

sighhhh
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 11:01:15 pm
pretty sure it was definitely A for the Broca's one. I'm not sure about the stuttering?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 12, 2008, 11:02:29 pm
oh yeah, and about the brocas one, was it defiently a?
i put down c? hopefully it was one where more than 1 answer was correct lol, like from past exams
i put down a, but yeah more than one answer can be correct in some cases, like the 2006 exam, i think?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 11:03:07 pm
It can be, but only if its valid!
Which it could be, i have no idea!
Anyone checked about Brocas and stuttering?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:03:36 pm
It's referring to the speech itself, so can someone jusify why they believe the speech would be deliberate?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 11:05:31 pm
Deliberate: To think carefully and often slowly, as about a choice to be made.

Meaning they have to think carefully and their speech is often slow.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 12, 2008, 11:08:38 pm
I honestly think it could be either.

Stuttering could easily be a characteristic of Broca's aphasia due to the non-fluent nature of the speech being produced.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 12, 2008, 11:14:51 pm
I put down slow and deliberate
my wanted score has gone down to 43, hopefully I didn't do too badly but I've spotted a couple of mistakes
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 12, 2008, 11:22:17 pm
hmm Grivas text book:
page 75, BOX 1:
"Damage to Broca's area often produces speech that is very deliberate, consisting of a few words with a very simple grammatical structure"
And not in the whole book could i find anything about stuttering...
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 12, 2008, 11:44:02 pm
oh crap lol
hopefully it was one of those that had 2 answers to it lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: nickalaz on June 12, 2008, 11:56:04 pm
a stuttering forum i frequent seem to be pretty content with stuttering being a physical effect of Broca's aphasia

http://www.stutteringforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=295
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 13, 2008, 02:33:12 pm
What about the colours of the wave lengths question?
It was in MC and it said what would be the best way to measure blue, red and green wavelenths or something.

I think the answer was frequency? does anyone rememeber.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 13, 2008, 02:37:16 pm
yeah i remember.
i was pretty definite that it was wavelengths but i may be wrong. i put that down because the visible spectrum of light is measured in wavelengths not frequency i think.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 13, 2008, 03:38:13 pm
yeah wavelength.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: username on June 13, 2008, 04:52:14 pm
It was wavelength. Height is intensity.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: misskaraleah on June 13, 2008, 05:00:44 pm
i hope its wavelengths, because i put that down, but now im  thinking it was frequency because depending on the high and low frequency of the wavelength, it can change from being blue wavelength to a red wavelength.

because the lower the frequency (shorter) produces blue and the higher the frequency (longer) produces red. Is that right?

Its in the Grivas book....
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 13, 2008, 05:08:22 pm
It was wavelength im 100% sure!!!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 13, 2008, 06:04:54 pm
so hopefully they will accept both answers lol as alot of people i think put c down as an answer
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 13, 2008, 06:28:17 pm
so hopefully they will accept both answers lol as alot of people i think put c down as an answer

I said C :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 13, 2008, 06:57:12 pm
me 2 lol,
cause i never read that there speech was deliberate.
but thats probably cause i own the heinemann text book
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 13, 2008, 07:11:42 pm
me 2 lol,
cause i never read that there speech was deliberate.
but thats probably cause i own the heinemann text book

lol so do I....Must be the worst out of the psych book? I thought it was good until it cost me a mark!!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 13, 2008, 07:17:39 pm
Did anyone get a copy of the exam today?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 13, 2008, 08:30:22 pm
i hate the heinemann book.
Hey Nick, my teacher i think picked up the exam, i should be able to get it on monday hopefully and scan it in by monday night. unless someone already has it?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 13, 2008, 09:06:38 pm
That'd be great. I'd be very grateful if someone could scan it.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 13, 2008, 09:08:12 pm
yeh well i should have it on by monday night, sorry you have to wait so long lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 13, 2008, 09:13:47 pm
That's alright. lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 14, 2008, 01:32:21 pm
Ooh question:
I'm still worrying about the exam, and today, i remembered the question about sleep deprivation?
Did it say physical and psychological effects? and then what long term consequesnces would there be?
I'm pretty sure it said physical... which was odd, because im sure we only covered psychological and physiological effects.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 14, 2008, 01:41:58 pm
i said there'd be no long term effects from sleep deprivation
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 01:45:06 pm
There would be no long term effects
I just wrote: "None"
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 14, 2008, 01:52:07 pm
mm i said none too, but i was more wondering about the physical effects?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 14, 2008, 01:53:39 pm
oh well i just put 'drooping eyelids' and 'fatigue'
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 01:54:37 pm
I put headaches and droopy eyelids

for psychological I put irritability and hallucinations
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 14, 2008, 03:05:08 pm
but isnt there a difference btwn physical and physiological? i said similar to those answers as well, but i always thought physiological was ffrom within the body, and physical was more external?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 03:28:44 pm
for simplicity, they are the same thing in all VCAA exams (vcaa may use the word physical or physiological)

The only place you may see the words used in different contexts is STAV exams..... (and there just gay, everyone knows that)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: melaniej on June 14, 2008, 03:30:48 pm
haha gosh i hope so!
we got taught them as different, so hopefully thats all good...
phew. im progressively de-stressing myself :)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 14, 2008, 04:48:19 pm
you mean your parasympathetic nervous system is restoring your body to homeostasis :)
haha
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 14, 2008, 05:00:55 pm
LOL haha
i put droop eyelids and tremor in the hands :) lol
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 14, 2008, 05:42:23 pm
LOL haha
i put droop eyelids and tremor in the hands :) lol

same!!!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: dcc on June 14, 2008, 06:09:37 pm
was there a question on this exam about people called kirk / emma jane?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 14, 2008, 06:13:08 pm
yep sure was
you didnt do it?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 06:14:46 pm
yes there was :D
that question was about perceptual set

I wrote past experience... briefly summarisd...

kirk saw old people cause he  was old and lived in a retirement village and so his past experience predisposed him to percieve the ambiguous figure as an older woman

emma jane was younger and she went to school with young girls.... past experience predisposed her to see the ambiguous as a young woman :D
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: dcc on June 14, 2008, 06:18:43 pm
because would you believe it, apparently my senior school principal wrote some of the exam.

and i hang out with a guy called kirk, and him and a girl called emma-jane (used to) always have arguments in our year 10 genetics class :P

how about that? :)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 06:29:07 pm
r u serious... lol cool
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 14, 2008, 10:12:08 pm
Did anyone else find the visual perception multis incredibly easy (apart from the one off Ames Room Q)

I think they really tried to tone it down this year cause of all the poor results in it from previous years......
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: j.el-halabi on June 14, 2008, 11:33:12 pm
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
i think you're correct on that one buddy coz i went to visit the aimes room at the museum and the floor was fine but the roof was slanted
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: j.el-halabi on June 14, 2008, 11:53:14 pm
For the Brocas question
So 100% the answer is slow and deliberate? Cause my teacher thinks otherwise, C.
i think your teacher is correct. Can anybody justify why it wouldn't be correct? They would stutter due to being unable to pronounce words properly, therefore having to try extra hard to pronounce words.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 15, 2008, 12:12:03 am
What did people right for the slanting of the floor of the Ame's room in the MC? I chose the one with "the floor doesn't slant but the ceiling does".
i think you're correct on that one buddy coz i went to visit the aimes room at the museum and the floor was fine but the roof was slanted
Lol the floor did slant in the museum, I went there too

Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: j.el-halabi on June 15, 2008, 12:17:07 am
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 15, 2008, 12:17:37 am
For the Brocas question
So 100% the answer is slow and deliberate? Cause my teacher thinks otherwise, C.
i think your teacher is correct. Can anybody justify why it wouldn't be correct? They would stutter due to being unable to pronounce words properly, therefore having to try extra hard to pronounce words.

I don't think I need to justify the slow part, because everyone knows its slow. But for the deliberate part.


Book:
Psychology by Grivas, Carter, Down

Page 75, Blue Box 1 titled: Damage to Broca's area and effects on speech
Quote first sentence of 2nd paragraph: "Damage to Broca's area often produces speech that is very deliberate"
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 15, 2008, 12:19:34 am
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?
I don't think you would get full marks for that because you had to make up an example for there situation. You didn't explain how context was applied (IE - Was Kirk shown images of elderly people before he saw the ambiguous figure). So I doubt you'd get any marks for just that description.
But if you put context in the first part of that question, you'd get the mark for that
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: j.el-halabi on June 15, 2008, 12:31:52 am
Hey guys you know with that question about Kirk and Emma- Jane or whatever the names were, is it ok if i just say the ambiguous figure was perceived as being either an old or young lady due to their predisposition to ignore ceratin aspects of the stimulant and interpret what they wanted based on the context that the ambiguous figure was percieved in??? without giving all those examples that everybody gave about kirk coming from a retirement village and so on..?
I don't think you would get full marks for that because you had to make up an example for there situation. You didn't explain how context was applied (IE - Was Kirk shown images of elderly people before he saw the ambiguous figure). So I doubt you'd get any marks for just that description.
But if you put context in the first part of that question, you'd get the mark for that
yeh i mentioned that Kirk and Emma were exposed to the ambigous figure in different contexts and i used the example of old ladies and young ladies respectively.. Oh well well just have to wait and see. Other than that pretty easy paper i say
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: ilovesuck on June 15, 2008, 12:36:45 am
what was the answer to:

"blahblahblah ESB can be used to map motor/somatosensory cortex blahblah.  why isnt it used often today?"
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 15, 2008, 12:48:13 am
Because it cannot be used on the healthy population, due to ethical purposes

Simpler terms: You wouldn't want someone slicing up your skull while your awake, and touching your open brain just for a few tests of where things are

But if someones already having surgery, or if they have brain damage, then it can be used
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: AppleThief on June 15, 2008, 09:22:23 am
Because it cannot be used on the healthy population, due to ethical purposes

Simpler terms: You wouldn't want someone slicing up your skull while your awake, and touching your open brain just for a few tests of where things are

But if someones already having surgery, or if they have brain damage, then it can be used
Yeah, it's invasive, and there are now better methods for looking at brain function.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 15, 2008, 04:15:13 pm
umm if i hopefully get the exam tomorrow and scan it in by tomorrow night, am i even allowed to? as in, am i breaking some sort of law? or is it ok?
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 15, 2008, 04:17:10 pm
lol people have posted pages from the GAT up - if you don't want to post it on the site, maybe just send it via email to people who request it
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 15, 2008, 04:19:20 pm
i might do that,
i know Nick is desperate to see it lol!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 15, 2008, 04:35:26 pm
No, there are no laws against posting the psych exam.

Last year the psych exam was on the net within a few hours and we were all discussing the answers.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 15, 2008, 04:40:37 pm
oh  ok then
it shall be up by tomorrow night hopefully,
then maybe Nick, you could do some suggested solutions if your up to it? :)
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 15, 2008, 04:43:24 pm
That'd be great, thanks.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 15, 2008, 04:49:58 pm
oh  ok then
it shall be up by tomorrow night hopefully,
then maybe Nick, you could do some suggested solutions if your up to it? :)

If enough people want them, I'd be happy to do suggested solutions. I wouldn't be able to get it finalised though until maybe Wednesday night (given my work situation).
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: sisqo1111 on June 15, 2008, 04:57:56 pm
thats fine, take your time ;) your doing us all a favour,
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 16, 2008, 05:21:17 pm
My multiple choice answers.... 1.............44

1.B D C A A C C D B A B B D C C(wrong) A C A A C B D C C A C B A B D D A C B C B B C C A C C B 44.D

hopefully you all got the same!!!
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 05:42:56 pm
I got FOR A0S1
1) B
2) D
3) C
4) A
5) A
6) C
7) C
8) D
9) B
10) A
11) B
12) B
13) D
14) C
15) A
16) A
17) C
18) B (think its wrong :()
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 05:54:24 pm
For AOS 2
A, C, B, D, C, C, A, C, B, A, B, D, D

For AOS 3
A, C, B, C, B, B, C, C, A, C, C, B, D
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 06:00:21 pm
I got everything the same as Daniel except question 18 :( Can't believe I got it wrong :(

it was such an easy question aswell
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 06:41:47 pm
What did everyone get for 14

Question
Which of the following responses is not produced by the sympathetic nervous system?
A) Relaxation of airways
B) Slowing of Digestion
C) An increase in the production of saliva
D) Dilation of Pupils


Me and daniel got C but Eriny thinks A
Which is correct
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 16, 2008, 06:42:44 pm
Its C...The sympathetic nervous system does relax the airways
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Nick on June 16, 2008, 06:50:35 pm
Yeah it's definitely C for sure. The sympathetic NS is responsible for decreasing production of saliva, causing the mouth to feel dry.
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: username on June 16, 2008, 06:54:47 pm
Increase in saliva = increase in digestion = parasympathetic
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 06:55:52 pm
alright thanks
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 16, 2008, 06:57:14 pm
my answers were the same as daniel99's, except for that silly mistake that i made with the ames room question  :(
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: psychlaw on June 16, 2008, 06:58:26 pm
wow it seems everyone is getting close to full marks
must've been an easy exam. I wonder what the cutoff will be for an A+
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 16, 2008, 07:02:33 pm
my answers were the same as daniel99's, except for that silly mistake that i made with the ames room question  :(

That gives me confidence!!!! Did you also get the bocas one wrong???
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: moshi on June 16, 2008, 07:30:53 pm
oh whoops actually i said slow and deliberate (A), so those two were the only difference between our answers
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: Eriny on June 16, 2008, 11:30:30 pm
What did everyone get for 14

Question
Which of the following responses is not produced by the sympathetic nervous system?
A) Relaxation of airways
B) Slowing of Digestion
C) An increase in the production of saliva
D) Dilation of Pupils


Me and daniel got C but Eriny thinks A
Which is correct
Bah, sorry. It's C. I can't remember if that was a typo or I got it wrong :P
Title: Re: Psychologists! What's your diagnosis?
Post by: daniel99 on June 17, 2008, 02:34:56 pm
What did everyone get for 14

Question
Which of the following responses is not produced by the sympathetic nervous system?
A) Relaxation of airways
B) Slowing of Digestion
C) An increase in the production of saliva
D) Dilation of Pupils


Me and daniel got C but Eriny thinks A
Which is correct
Bah, sorry. It's C. I can't remember if that was a typo or I got it wrong :P

I would say typo! lol you did get a 50..