ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: sxcalexc on August 30, 2008, 07:29:43 pm
-
Hey guys this is the last question in the exercise... I'm having a bit of difficulty.. Any help appreciated, thank you.
(http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/8324/47267503hn0.jpg)
-
a)
 = ke^{-kx} - k^2xe^{-kx})
Anti-differentiate both sides now, to yield:
\,dx)
Cancelling out a
: \, dx)
Splitting the integral term by term: 
Rearranging to obtain the desired integral: 
)
b)
Mean:

Let 
Using part (a):
\right]^\infty_0)
Evaluating the integral: lots of terms go to zero, except 2. One is complicated and one is a constant:
 + \frac{1}{k})
Fact:  = 0)
This fact holds because the exponential function decreases far faster than the linear function, hence as
goes to infinity, this becomes zero. That's not a solid proof, but it is a general rule of thumb that works -- exponentials change faster than polynomials. This isn't something you need to know for Methods - so it's the exercise's problem for having that ambigious term there.
Since 

c)
Graph-sketching problem involving exponential functions. Shouldn't be too difficult. Just make sure you show the effects of a different size of
.
d)
Larger values of
will result in smaller
, which decrease the vertical dilation of the graph, so the curves with larger values of
will be flatter. The horizontal dilation of the graph will increase with larger values of
, which also contributes to a flatter-looking graph.
This is consistent with the definition found in part (b),
. Since the graph starts at
, and it diminishes rapidly (being a decaying exponential function), a flatter graph that takes longer to decay (less steep) is required to have a larger mean. Hence, a larger mean (larger value of
) is consistent with a flatter graph.
-
Coblin, what program did u use to write all these formulas.
-
Coblin, what program did u use to write all these formulas.
LaTeX, something that is embedded into this forum. I just have to type in a particular format in between TEX tags, and it will come out in a nicer looking viewer format (as a picture). To learn how to use it, see this thread: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,3137.0.html
-
Coblin, what program did u use to write all these formulas.
LaTeX, something that is embedded into this forum. I just have to type in a particular format in between TEX tags, and it will come out in a nicer looking viewer format (as a picture). To learn how to use it, see this thread: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,3137.0.html
thanks
-
Thx very much for your effort Coblin. In regards to part a, the book have this as the answer for the derivative and integral, respectively:
(http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/5606/hmmdv1.jpg)
Do you think they just left out the second half of the derivative? The integral is the same.
EDIT: Actually the integral is slightly different. One of the signs differs. I think they got that wrong too ? ???
-
Yeah, I think they got that wrong, haha. It's not a well designed question (and answer), coz it had to use that fact that isn't in the course, in part (b).
-
Yeah, I think they got that wrong, haha. It's not a well designed question (and answer), coz it had to use that fact that isn't in the course, in part (b).
Right.. what bastards. Lol, I kind of figured that 'rule of thumb' applied just by looking at it logically anyway. Perhaps that's what they want us to do? Nevertheless, muchas gracias.
-
Yeah, Ahmad did say to me, looking at it like:
is obvious, but it still looks like
(indeterminate) when you let
-
Yeah, Ahmad did say to me, looking at it like:
is obvious, but it still looks like
(indeterminate) when you let 
Mmm.. indeed. Duly noted. So, basically, whenever something is put to a power of a negative infinity, so to speak, it is effectively 0.
Ah, another question for you. In part a where you cancelled the k. Can you do that in the integrals as well? I was told that you can't multiply or divide like that inside integrals.
-
I think I remember doing this question actually, had to ask my teacher about it.
-
if you must, L'Hopital's rule (taking derivative of top and bottom when encountering an indeterminant)

however, you don't learn this until first year uni :P
-
Ah, another question for you. In part a where you cancelled the k. Can you do that in the integrals as well? I was told that you can't multiply or divide like that inside integrals.
Since
is a constant, I can just take it out of the integral, and it will cancel out.
-

Writing
lost my mate marks on a MUEP assignment.
-

Writing
lost my mate marks on a MUEP assignment.
That's because
isn't a number.
But,

So I agree with you. Mao is wrong :) Haha
[And no Mao, I will not prove L'Hopital's rule]