ATAR Notes: Forum

VCE Stuff => VCE Science => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Psychology => Topic started by: username on October 07, 2008, 09:48:43 am

Title: Little Albert experiment
Post by: username on October 07, 2008, 09:48:43 am
Would you say that the main steps of conditioning in Little Albert were Acquisition, stimulus discrimination and Stimulus generalization? Since he was never subjected to extinction, and spontaneous recovery didn't happen since it was never extinct?

Thanks for any help
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: melaniej on October 07, 2008, 04:19:02 pm
The main stages in the classical conditioning of a fear response in 'Little Albert' were as you mentioned above.
Acquisition was the process of him acquiring the fear response to the rat.
Generalisation was when it was applied to the rabbit etc
I'm not sure about discrimination? As he still showed a weak response to the coat and the santa outfit, so I'm unsure as to whether stimulus discrimination occurred.
Why do you ask, is there a specific question on this?
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: ilovesuck on October 07, 2008, 05:02:12 pm
hmm yes, i dont think stimulus discrimination and stimulus generalisation can occur at the same time...
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: username on October 07, 2008, 06:29:03 pm
Well the question was,

Name 4 of the main stages of classical conditioning in the little albert experiment.

I'm just wondering if extinction would be considered one, even though he was never really extinct.
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: Eriny on October 07, 2008, 11:32:22 pm
I guess you could put extinction in hypothetically, as in 'if Albert continued to see rats that were not paired with a stimulus which elicited a fear reaction...', but otherwise, there was some discrimination. Much of learning involves discrimination, after all, he could discriminate between the rat and the sight of his mother, for instance.

Is this based on a question? If so, do post it, if not, I wouldn't really worry too much about it.
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: username on October 08, 2008, 03:57:05 pm
Oh yeah it was based on a question. It was on a sample exam on Insight 2008, but I can't take it home since it was a school one, the question went like

"Name the four main stages of the B.Watson's Litlte Albert exp"

I asked the teacher today and she vaguely brushed me off with "oh just like before conditioning, after conditioning..."

So if it was like she said, what would the answer have been?

Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: jess3254 on October 08, 2008, 08:23:50 pm
I think the four stages would probably be/refer to:

First - test emotional response to rat:
RAT (would be neutral stimulus) ---> no emotional response

Second - test natural fear reaction to loud noise
SUDDEN LOUD NOISE (unconditioned stimulus) ----> fear (unconditioned response)

Third - associate rat and loud noise
RAT + SUDDEN LOUD NOISE ---> fear

Fourth - test emotional response to rat without the loud noise
RAT (conditioned stimulus) ----> fear
Title: Re: Little Albert experiment
Post by: arthurk on October 26, 2008, 11:17:51 pm
agreed with jessie0
seems like a sorta question we could take a few ways but hers seems the most logical as it did end up with the little albert being conditioned to produce a fear response when presented with the white rat even in the absence of the loud noise