ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: trinon on November 06, 2008, 01:44:37 am
-
Ever have an equation you want to derive, but couldn't because you plain don't know how? Well than this is the guide for you!
As a side note, this is actually covered under the Methods study design and a question like this will most probably be asked on either of the two exams.
So without further Apu (hehe, Simpsons related joke):
TRINON'S GUIDE TO ANTI-DERIVATIVES THROUGH DERIVATIVES
I'm only going to run through the fundamental method, because there isn't much else to it. It only starts getting hard in Specialist Maths when they start throwing things like differentiate
and hence anti-differentiate
and things like that.
We start off with an equation that we can't anti differentiate with any method that has been covered in the methods study design.
)
We first multiply this equation by
so that we get
.
Next we find the derivative via the product rule:
) = log_e(x) + \frac{x}{x} = log_e(x) + 1)
Next we re-arrange the new equation:
 = \frac{d}{dx}(xlog_e(x)) - 1)
If we now anti-derive both sides we get:
 dx = \int\frac{d}{dx}(xlog_e(x)) dx - \int1 dx)
 dx = xlog_e(x) - x + C)
Now you can Anti-derive the in-anti-derivable!
Hope this helps guys. If you've got any questions just ask.
-
Nice... didn't know about this actually
-
BTW, you cannot get asked to do something like this unless they provide you with the necessary function to derive first, then hence, using that result, anti-derive it to solve the more difficult integral.
-
things like
,
and other assorted don't work with this. :P
-
things like
,
and other assorted don't work with this. :P
Yeah, we know. This was more for the "Differentiate
and hence anti-differentiate
". It's not a perfect solution..
-
things like
,
and other assorted don't work with this. :P
 = x e^{x} + e^{x} \implies \int xe^{x} \ dx = xe^{x} - e^x + c_{1})
And so on :P
-
Holy kcuf genius ! thanks
-
this is just antidifferentiation by recognition yeh?
-
Also, you can use \cos{x} to represent
-
Also, you can use \cos{x} to represent 
I prefer brackets, it gives exactly what you're doing rather than "Hmm, do I include that in the cos or don't I?" dilemma.
-
Also, you can use \cos{x} to represent 
I prefer brackets, it gives exactly what you're doing rather than "Hmm, do I include that in the cos or don't I?" dilemma.
no, as in non-italic
and
as opposed to
-
Also, you can use \cos{x} to represent 
I prefer brackets, it gives exactly what you're doing rather than "Hmm, do I include that in the cos or don't I?" dilemma.
no, as in non-italic
and
as opposed to ,\; log_e(x))
I fail to care either way. Makes no difference to me.
-
cos is cos and log is log, who cares? Thanks trinon :D
-
Also, you can use \cos{x} to represent 
I prefer brackets, it gives exactly what you're doing rather than "Hmm, do I include that in the cos or don't I?" dilemma.
Then \cos{(x)} (as Mao just used).
-
can I ask a question?
find d/dx 2xsin3x and hence find the exact value of anti (x cos3x )dx
upper limit :pai/6 lower limit 0
thank you
-
} \right] = 2\sin{(3x)} + 6x\cos{(3x)})
Integrating both sides with respect to
:
} = \int 2\sin{(3x)}\, dx + \int 6x\cos{(3x)}\, dx)
}\, dx = 2x \sin{(3x)} - \int 2\sin{(3x)}\, dx)
}\, dx = 2x \sin{(3x)} + \frac{2}{3} \cos{(3x)} + C)
By the fundamental theorem of calculus, if
, then \, dx = F(b) - F(a))
Therefore }\, dx = \left[2x \sin{(3x)} + \frac{2}{3} \cos{(3x)}\right]_0^{\frac{\pi}{6}})
 + \frac{2}{3}\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right) - \left[0 + \frac{2}{3}\cos{(0)}\right])

Therefore
-
this is just antidifferentiation by recognition yeh?
yepp.
& thanks for posting, trinon
-
if you generalize this you get integration by parts =D
-
yes we do.. i think someone mentioned it to trinon on the night he published this HOW TO guide
-
There's a chapter in my text book on this... 'Integration by Recognition'. Is it a common thing in the exams? I don't really 'get it' too well... also seams pointless. Are the VCAA known to ever ask questions like this? Edit: Well I've worked it out after a bit more though... rather than just showing maths it really should be explained better in the OP, imo...
-
Can someone explain wth is this? and why multiply by x?