ATAR Notes: Forum

VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: cinnamonbun on November 06, 2008, 03:39:45 pm

Title: im confused
Post by: cinnamonbun on November 06, 2008, 03:39:45 pm
i was just looking over insight 2008 exam 1 and question 1bwas anti diffing 1/(x-3)
and i didnt add absolute value signs cos i was told that was only used in spesh but then the answers tell you "not to forget the signs" and u cant really do the whole question unless you have the absolute value signs

so now i am confused... help anyone?  :(
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: bec on November 06, 2008, 03:45:52 pm
i think you need the absolute value signs
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: polky on November 06, 2008, 03:50:08 pm
Use absolute value signs!
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: trinon on November 06, 2008, 03:51:29 pm
i think you need the absolute value signs

Use absolute value signs!
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: cinnamonbun on November 06, 2008, 03:52:37 pm
argh fine = =
so do i ALWAYS add them? or only when i need them?
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: ReVeL on November 06, 2008, 03:55:41 pm
Yeah, you do have to include the modulus sign.

Consider the graph with its domain of

The antiderivative will be

However, if you look at the graph of the antiderivative, is only defined for when , despite the original graph being defined for excluding .

THEREFORE, you must include the absolute signs in the function of the antiderivative.

Hence, it is which has the required domain of , (check by sketching on the calculator).

Hope that helps abit.

EDIT: haha INTERGRATING is what I meant to do.
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: fredrick on November 06, 2008, 03:57:09 pm
log of a negative number is undefined. So if for any x the inside is negative use the modulus other wise it doesnt matter. example:
doesnt require modulus cause for all real x.

requires modulus cause is not always >0 for some x.
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: fredrick on November 06, 2008, 03:58:31 pm
Yeah, you do have to include the modulus sign.

Consider the graph with its domain of
The derivative will be

However, if you look at the graph of the derivative, is only defined for when , despite the original graph being defined for excluding .

THEREFORE, you must include the absolute signs in the function of the derivative.

Hence, which has the required domain of , (check by sketching on the calculator), and allows us to find the gradient of the curve when while the first one doesn't.

Hope that helps abit.
u mean antiderivative?
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: nerd on November 06, 2008, 03:59:11 pm
Yeah, you do have to include the modulus sign.

Consider the graph with its domain of

The derivative will be

However, if you look at the graph of the derivative, is only defined for when , despite the original graph being defined for excluding .

THEREFORE, you must include the absolute signs in the function of the derivative.

Hence, which has the required domain of , (check by sketching on the calculator), and allows us to find the gradient of the curve when while the first one doesn't.

Hope that helps abit.

I think you've made a mistake - you should be integrating rather than differentiating!
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: cinnamonbun on November 06, 2008, 04:01:19 pm
log of a negative number is undefined. So if for any x the inside is negative use the modulus other wise it doesnt matter. example:
doesnt require modulus cause for all real x.

requires modulus cause is not always >0 for some x.

okie dokes
thanks everyone ^o^
i was given the impression by my peers at school and stuff that the absolute signs were just for spesh o_o

thanks revel i get wut ur saying :]
Title: Re: im confused
Post by: ReVeL on November 06, 2008, 04:18:13 pm
Yep - accidentally typed derivative.

Sorry. :S