ATAR Notes: Forum

Administration => Site Discussion => Suggestions => Topic started by: Mao on July 17, 2011, 11:16:44 pm

Title: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 17, 2011, 11:16:44 pm
Counter-part to bug reporting. Please report bugs here: SMF 2.0!

Please give suggestions for changes to this template.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: enwiabe on July 17, 2011, 11:21:29 pm
Yeah this is a very good idea, Mao. SMF 2 has a whole BUNCH of new features and stuff that I don't even know about yet! So do some digging online and if you see something cool that you know SMF 2 can do that we're not using, let us know here.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: schnappy on July 17, 2011, 11:33:17 pm
Not on the technical side, but can you disable forum signatures? When they take up half the page they're just annoying. Or atleast disable images in signatures.

Also the 'ATAR Notes' header, isn't going across 100% of my page. There's a sizeable piece of white on the right... little css tweaks needed hmmm.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 17, 2011, 11:45:36 pm
Not on the technical side, but can you disable forum signatures? When they take up half the page they're just annoying. Or atleast disable images in signatures.

you can disable sigs in your profile.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 17, 2011, 11:46:50 pm
There is auto-necromancy detection. A red reminder text is visible in the quick reply dialogue for posts >120days old. Should change it to something less. (like, 30 days or something)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 17, 2011, 11:58:33 pm
Respect cap.

At the high end of the spectrum, the numerical value of respect really loses its meaning. perhaps put a cap on it, like +100 as max or something?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 18, 2011, 12:43:49 am
A Shoutbox ? :O
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: TrueTears on July 18, 2011, 12:47:13 am
Respect cap.

At the high end of the spectrum, the numerical value of respect really loses its meaning. perhaps put a cap on it, like +100 as max or something?
good idea, however i rmb enwiabe saying something about how tutors will be ranked in terms of respect or something along those lines? what if latter on we get like 10 diff ppl with the same +100 respect.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Thu Thu Train on July 18, 2011, 12:49:24 am
A Shoutbox ? :O
NO. FUCK YOU.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 18, 2011, 12:51:14 am
Perhaps Respect can just be worded eg (1-10 : contributor 11-20: somethingelse) and then when it comes to tutoring use the actual numbers (I personally probably won't even sign up for it this year anyway if you're going to hold me to respect bias :P )

I'm only suggesting that because you're asking for a change though, I personally think capping it at 100 is just a token gesture which probably takes away more than it adds. Also after a while there will be a large amount of people at that level.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 18, 2011, 02:16:03 am
Respect cap.

At the high end of the spectrum, the numerical value of respect really loses its meaning. perhaps put a cap on it, like +100 as max or something?
good idea, however i rmb enwiabe saying something about how tutors will be ranked in terms of respect or something along those lines? what if latter on we get like 10 diff ppl with the same +100 respect.

I think at that end of the spectrum, the tutors wouldn't care. :P
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: stonecold on July 18, 2011, 09:43:42 am
-Make each of the VCE, HSC, WACE & SACE forum links on the homepage link directly to the state forums.
-Is there some kind of function where you can enter the page number of a thread that you want to go to?...because currently clicking next several times to get to the middle of a long thread is pretty annoying.
-User customisable option to change the number of posts per page.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 18, 2011, 09:47:29 am
-Is there some kind of function where you can enter the page number of a thread that you want to go to?...because currently clicking next several times to get to the middle of a long thread is pretty annoying.

always done this by editing the url, but yes, some kind of GUI would be nice.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on July 18, 2011, 10:24:15 am
Haven't read around much, but two things needed for me:
1. images in sigs
2. latex back up

Both are pretty minor, great job guys!
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Russ on July 18, 2011, 11:04:03 am
Do we really need images in sigs?

This isn't really a 2.0 suggestion, but you might want to think about entering a new lot of postcount usertitles to go with the new atarnotes development (I assume the current ones are from 4 years ago?)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 18, 2011, 02:17:24 pm
1. images in sigs

Images in sigs work. (check the userbars in some people's sigs)

Re: LaTeX, Please see [Temporary] Rendering LaTeX using the Google Charts API

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Gloamglozer on July 18, 2011, 02:19:33 pm
On the topic of post counts as Russ pointed out, with those blocks that increase as post count increases, perhaps change it to a bar or something?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Hutchoo on July 18, 2011, 05:57:44 pm
On the topic of post counts as Russ pointed out, with those blocks that increase as post count increases, perhaps change it to a bar or something?
The stars were cool :(

But yeah, I personally think the blocks look bad. A bar would suffice.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 18, 2011, 06:00:38 pm
Would personally like to see the "recent posts" section upped to 20 posts. What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Russ on July 18, 2011, 06:05:18 pm
What about having it changed to a "recent threads" section, so that one hyperactive thread doesn't take over the entire box? Maybe with a bracketed number at the end to indicate how many recent replies?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 18, 2011, 06:06:16 pm
Yup love it, will probably have to wait a bit whilst the other bugs are sorted though because it's not a default setting.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 18, 2011, 06:48:58 pm
-Make each of the VCE, HSC, WACE & SACE forum links on the homepage link directly to the state forums.
-Is there some kind of function where you can enter the page number of a thread that you want to go to?...because currently clicking next several times to get to the middle of a long thread is pretty annoying.
-User customisable option to change the number of posts per page.

1. Planned on it... But still need to talk it over.
2. Sort of. You can click the ellipsis between page numbers.
3. Exists. Though you don't have access to it. I'll look into it.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 18, 2011, 06:49:49 pm
1. images in sigs

Images in sigs work. (check the userbars in some people's sigs)

Re: LaTeX, Please see [Temporary] Rendering LaTeX using the Google Charts API

Update: LaTeX is working now.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: stonecold on July 18, 2011, 08:01:32 pm
-Make each of the VCE, HSC, WACE & SACE forum links on the homepage link directly to the state forums.
-Is there some kind of function where you can enter the page number of a thread that you want to go to?...because currently clicking next several times to get to the middle of a long thread is pretty annoying.
-User customisable option to change the number of posts per page.

1. Planned on it... But still need to talk it over.
2. Sort of. You can click the ellipsis between page numbers.
3. Exists. Though you don't have access to it. I'll look into it.

Cheers Dave.  really appreciate all the effort.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: stonecold on July 18, 2011, 08:47:32 pm
What about having it changed to a "recent threads" section, so that one hyperactive thread doesn't take over the entire box? Maybe with a bracketed number at the end to indicate how many recent replies?

Love this idea.  Should definitely go ahead when things die down.

Also, is this still going ahead?
Like the new website, but where's IB?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 19, 2011, 04:56:34 am
What about having it changed to a "recent threads" section, so that one hyperactive thread doesn't take over the entire box? Maybe with a bracketed number at the end to indicate how many recent replies?

Love this idea.  Should definitely go ahead when things die down.

Also, is this still going ahead?
Like the new website, but where's IB?

There was a cool SMF mod for this... I originally had it implemented, but with all the chaos, it seems to have disappeared. Think Mr. Enwiabe prefers recent posts anyway. But it's definitely something to keep in mind.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: ninwa on July 23, 2011, 12:58:51 am
I don't think it's necessary to sort universities into states, it just creates more effort clicking through. Thoughts?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: stonecold on July 23, 2011, 02:44:19 am
I don't think it's necessary to sort universities into states, it just creates more effort clicking through. Thoughts?

I don't think it creates more efforts tbh.  All of the state child boards for universities can be directly accessed from the AN forum homepage.  It will become really cluttered if there are 30 or 40 unis being discussed on a single board.

I would just take the universities currently under the uni board in each of the state forums and move them so they all appear in the national forum uni board under each state, then delete.

Also, if you get time, maybe add UQ and UTAS sub forums because these a popular unis for med at least.

The same needs to be done with UMAT/Buy-Sell/Water Cooler boards because they are doubled up.  They appear on the national forum and then appear again in each of the state forums.

And it was mentioned elsewhere, enwiabe said he was going to introduce an IB board, but maybe re-discuss it with him. I don't think it would hurt to have an IB board.  I mean after all, it can only generate more traffic/exposure which is a good thing.

Here is a pictorial because I don't think I was very clear on the whole uni thing.  :p

(http://img847.imageshack.us/img847/9686/ddddddqv.png)

(http://img811.imageshack.us/img811/9968/xzfadsfdsf.png)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Fyrefly on July 23, 2011, 04:01:39 am
I don't think it's necessary to sort universities into states, it just creates more effort clicking through. Thoughts?

I had the same thought as you, but what about interstate unis that don't have their own boards?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 23, 2011, 10:38:23 am
Prevent 1 or 2 post accounts from posting links. Recently had a lot of spambots trying to sell viagra.

Don't give me this bullshit about VN being about equality, and therefore not restricting any access dependent on postcount. This is a safety issue.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Thu Thu Train on July 23, 2011, 11:31:38 am
Prevent 1 or 2 post accounts from posting links. Recently had a lot of spambots trying to sell viagra.

Don't give me this bullshit about VN being about equality, and therefore not restricting any access dependent on postcount. This is a safety issue.
I've been on a few forums where the minimum post count to post links is 5. I think it's a good idea and helps prevent spam.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: WhoTookMyUsername on July 23, 2011, 12:35:34 pm
anyway to get a 'choice' of scheme? seen this on a few websites (like fanfooty.com.au)..

orange and white and blue just does not work for me :O
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on July 23, 2011, 12:37:15 pm
anyway to get a 'choice' of scheme? seen this on a few websites (like fanfooty.com.au)..

orange and white and blue just does not work for me :O

A better one is coming:
The current theme will be modified to better suit the aesthetics of the site.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: ninwa on July 23, 2011, 04:04:35 pm
Prevent 1 or 2 post accounts from posting links. Recently had a lot of spambots trying to sell viagra.

Don't give me this bullshit about VN being about equality, and therefore not restricting any access dependent on postcount. This is a safety issue.

you can do that if you know how to
*stares hopelessly at the myriad of sections in the administration section*
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 23, 2011, 09:56:40 pm
I'll do it if I can but I don't think it is an inbuilt permissions thing
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 23, 2011, 10:00:30 pm
The closest I can think of is preventing topics being made by 1 posters. That said I do realize some people come here to post 1 post, and that is a "tutor wanted" ad, but with the new tutoring system coming into effect soonish that problem may be solved.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on July 23, 2011, 10:15:43 pm
The closest I can think of is preventing topics being made by 1 posters. That said I do realize some people come here to post 1 post, and that is a "tutor wanted" ad, but with the new tutoring system coming into effect soonish that problem may be solved.
Wouldn't that restrict a brand new user from making their own topic? I know that my first post here was a new topic. It would have annoyed me a lot if I had to post elsewhere before being able to make a topic that addressed the question I wanted to ask.

Also: Forcing a new user to make a few posts would just result in crappy posts being made or people hijacking threads.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 23, 2011, 10:17:53 pm
The closest I can think of is preventing topics being made by 1 posters. That said I do realize some people come here to post 1 post, and that is a "tutor wanted" ad, but with the new tutoring system coming into effect soonish that problem may be solved.
Wouldn't that restrict a brand new user from making their own topic? I know that my first post here was a new topic. It would have annoyed me a lot if I had to post elsewhere before being able to make a topic that addressed the question I wanted to ask.

Hence my concern
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on July 23, 2011, 10:31:26 pm
http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=2404

There's this mod for SMF 2.0 that will block users under a certain postcount from posting links, might be worth exploring.

Edit: I think you can also do it by creating two groups (one for post counts under 1 and the other for over one) and then setting permissions accordingly. This method comes off to me as probably causing more problems than it's worth though.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 23, 2011, 10:50:23 pm
Yeah pretty much looks like what we're looking for :)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Deadshot on July 23, 2011, 11:27:53 pm
Put the recent posts at the top of the page, instead of the top.

It makes so much sense.

:)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on July 23, 2011, 11:48:57 pm
Put the recent posts at the top of the page, instead of the top.

It makes so much sense.
"Put the recent posts at the top ... instead of the top"?
It isn't making much sense to me :P
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Mao on July 24, 2011, 12:39:35 am
Put the recent posts at the top of the page, instead of the top.

It makes so much sense.
"Put the recent posts at the top ... instead of the top"?
It isn't making much sense to me :P

He is suggesting to move the "10 most recent posts" from bottom to top. Which does make a lot of sense.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on July 24, 2011, 12:59:43 am
He is suggesting to move the "10 most recent posts" from bottom to top. Which does make a lot of sense.
Yeah, it's a good point. I was just poking fun at the typo.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on July 25, 2011, 07:01:58 pm
Image sig size restrictions are pretty bad :(

Max 57p width? WHAT?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 26, 2011, 03:10:31 am
Image sig size restrictions are pretty bad :(

Max 57p width? WHAT?


I don't know who messed with them. *glares at Dan*. I'll fix it.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on July 30, 2011, 12:46:53 pm
This is also a bit weird:

I typed
Code: [Select]
[url]http://www.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=43190.msg452269[/url]
and it came up with:
Re: does having a 6th subject give you an advantage?

Even though the link is to the 'Best textbooks' thread


Can this be fixed? It's really odd.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 30, 2011, 12:51:06 pm
This is also a bit weird:

I typed
Code: [Select]
[url]http://www.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=43190.msg452269[/url]
and it came up with:
Re: does having a 6th subject give you an advantage?

Even though the link is to the 'Best textbooks' thread


Can this be fixed? It's really odd.

It's tied in with the last post issue. I'll probably be shutting the forum down around 3am Melbourne time to work on it for awhile.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 30, 2011, 01:21:13 pm
Image sig size restrictions are pretty bad :(

Max 57p width? WHAT?


I don't know who messed with them. *glares at Dan*. I'll fix it.

Changing the parameters for it doesn't seem to fix it either :S

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 30, 2011, 02:04:49 pm
Image sig size restrictions are pretty bad :(

Max 57p width? WHAT?


I don't know who messed with them. *glares at Dan*. I'll fix it.

Changing the parameters for it doesn't seem to fix it either :S

It's been fixed. Idk what you're talking about. :p
PS: It checks it on signature change... And modifies it... So if it's stuck at the old dimensions somewhere... You just need to take the dimensions out of the img tag and re-save.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on July 30, 2011, 02:08:53 pm
Image sig size restrictions are pretty bad :(

Max 57p width? WHAT?


I don't know who messed with them. *glares at Dan*. I'll fix it.

Changing the parameters for it doesn't seem to fix it either :S

It's been fixed. Idk what you're talking about. :p
PS: It checks it on signature change... And modifies it... So if it's stuck at the old dimensions somewhere... You just need to take the dimensions out of the img tag and re-save.
Yep it works. Look down.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 30, 2011, 02:15:00 pm
my bad 8)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: shinny on July 30, 2011, 06:56:12 pm
Minor aesthetic fix; for the tutoring section where it says 'Based on 2 Review(S)', lower case R and S for the reviews part please :)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Thu Thu Train on July 30, 2011, 07:13:56 pm
Minor aesthetic fix; for the tutoring section where it says 'Based on 2 Review(S)', lower case R and S for the reviews part please :)
aesthetic and grammar.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: shinny on July 31, 2011, 12:34:07 am
Another minor fix? Can't view more than 3 tutoring reviews at the moment. Not sure if that's intended. Perhaps a 'View All' button or similar could be useful?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 31, 2011, 12:44:46 am
Another minor fix? Can't view more than 3 tutoring reviews at the moment. Not sure if that's intended. Perhaps a 'View All' button or similar could be useful?

The functionality is in place, but *someone* removed the link. :p Though the design for it isn't complete... So probably after this weekend.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 31, 2011, 12:48:16 am
Are the overall integer ratings floored?

It's a tiny thing, but it seems a bit strange that after receiving all 9.8 and 10 reviews shinny only gets a 9. Perhaps one decimal? :P
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 31, 2011, 06:10:53 am
This is also a bit weird:

I typed
Code: [Select]
[url]http://www.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php?topic=43190.msg452269[/url]
and it came up with:
Re: does having a 6th subject give you an advantage?

Even though the link is to the 'Best textbooks' thread


Can this be fixed? It's really odd.

It's tied in with the last post issue. I'll probably be shutting the forum down around 3am Melbourne time to work on it for awhile.

My mistake... This was never a bug. Beware... By design... SMF's Last Post link contains message IDs which don't actually exist in the topic. It's an SMF design flaw. Make sure when linking to actually get the link from the post in the topic and not the Last Post link. Also... While I'm here... The Last Post issue isn't a bug either. SMF by default, for the sake of efficiency, does not count posts more than two levels deep. Not yet sure what I will do about this.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 31, 2011, 06:11:10 am
Are the overall integer ratings floored?

It's a tiny thing, but it seems a bit strange that after receiving all 9.8 and 10 reviews shinny only gets a 9. Perhaps one decimal? :P

They're rounded. Shinny has had 7 reviews... I know you can only see the last 3 right now... But there were a couple that had given lower scores. The score is correct.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 31, 2011, 11:07:01 am
Are the overall integer ratings floored?

It's a tiny thing, but it seems a bit strange that after receiving all 9.8 and 10 reviews shinny only gets a 9. Perhaps one decimal? :P

They're rounded. Shinny has had 7 reviews... I know you can only see the last 3 right now... But there were a couple that had given lower scores. The score is correct.

Aah I didn't notice
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: WhoTookMyUsername on July 31, 2011, 11:26:37 am
is it possible to alter the "you last message was posted from IP less than 20 seconds ago" or something..
atm

if you try post within 20 seconds, it seems you have to wait the full 20 seconds again before posting / pming?
possible to make it so attempting to post does not count as post?
sometimes i get excited and end up having to wait 2 minutes ='-


Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: REBORN on July 31, 2011, 11:30:03 am
^ ROFL. Pretty sure it's 15seconds though.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: WhoTookMyUsername on July 31, 2011, 11:31:02 am
also, it think it would be a good idea to introduce a pm window maybe once ever 6 months that you have to say you still want your add up on the tutoring section. If this does not occur, i can see the tutoring section getting very clogged up in a few years.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Thu Thu Train on July 31, 2011, 11:51:14 am
I don't know what we're using for at the moment but what about http://www.mathjax.org/?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on July 31, 2011, 12:05:25 pm
I don't know what we're using for at the moment but what about http://www.mathjax.org/?

Some SMF mod. Real LaTeX coming in the future.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on July 31, 2011, 06:27:23 pm
^ ROFL. Pretty sure it's 15seconds though.

trust you to know with PMing on VN being your main form of chat :P
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: REBORN on July 31, 2011, 08:11:41 pm
^ I'm assumed how lexitu +'d you. hehe lexy babes =P
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on August 01, 2011, 09:20:14 pm
What does this button do (http://www.atarnotes.com/forum/Themes/default/images/bbc/badbehavior_bbc.gif) when making a post?

Code: [Select]
[suspicious]...[/suspicious]
Just curious
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on August 01, 2011, 09:24:07 pm
What does this button do (http://www.atarnotes.com/forum/Themes/default/images/bbc/badbehavior_bbc.gif) when making a post?

Code: [Select]
[suspicious]...[/suspicious]
Just curious
The mouseover text for the button says "hide enclosed from suspicious visitors".

I don't know who would be considered a "suspicious visitor" though.
Maybe guests? Nope, viewing as a guest still shows the 'enclosed' text.


[suspicious]...testing suspicious tag...[/suspicious]

Edit: From the SMF website. (looks like it's apart of some SMF mod called 'Bad Behaviour')
Quote
For example, if you have a meeting and want to post your email address, instead of just posting it you can enclose the content in the new BBC code.  If a guest gets flagged suspicious by BB they will not be able to see the information.  But a logged in user or a guest who is not suspicious will be able to see the information.


Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on August 01, 2011, 09:28:21 pm
^^I also tried it, couldn't see a difference from normal text
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Lasercookie on August 01, 2011, 09:29:57 pm
^^I also tried it, couldn't see a difference from normal text
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=375980.msg3118845#msg3118845

It looks like users have to be flagged as suspicious or something like that. (assuming that it is this 'Bad Behaviour' mod that is being used)

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: pi on August 01, 2011, 09:32:47 pm
Hmmmm. An anti-spam measure, looks useful for AN :)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Fyrefly on August 01, 2011, 10:51:32 pm
Hmmmm. An anti-spam measure, looks useful for AN :)

It may be shortsighted of me to say so, but I don't really see how it'd be useful... We just ban spambots and trolls.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Russ on August 02, 2011, 07:37:00 am
I don't think it's anti-spam, it's more anti-data mining
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Gloamglozer on August 02, 2011, 11:46:16 am
Hmmmm. An anti-spam measure, looks useful for AN :)

It may be shortsighted of me to say so, but I don't really see how it'd be useful... We just ban spambots and trolls.

Wait, we're supposed to ban them?  I thought we were supposed to just eat them...  Oops sorry.

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: nacho on August 02, 2011, 09:34:53 pm
just gotta put it out there..
this new look really sucks old one was way better and always will be
maybe u could revert to the 'old-look' whilst keeping any technical changes?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: enwiabe on August 02, 2011, 09:39:15 pm
just gotta put it out there..
this new look really sucks old one was way better and always will be
maybe u could revert to the 'old-look' whilst keeping any technical changes?

Well, when we first switched over, lots of people were glowing about the new layout - without even realising that this is the new stock standard SMF 2 layout.

There are plans for a custom forum skin, but aesthetics are the least of our concerns at the moment, especially when pretty much everyone has said that it looks adequate as is.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: nacho on August 02, 2011, 09:46:25 pm
just gotta put it out there..
this new look really sucks old one was way better and always will be
maybe u could revert to the 'old-look' whilst keeping any technical changes?

Well, when we first switched over, lots of people were glowing about the new layout - without even realising that this is the new stock standard SMF 2 layout.

There are plans for a custom forum skin, but aesthetics are the least of our concerns at the moment, especially when pretty much everyone has said that it looks adequate as is.
this is madness
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on August 02, 2011, 09:51:34 pm
While we are all here, is respect working properly or is it abit out of whack?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Fyrefly on August 02, 2011, 09:52:30 pm
Hmmmm. An anti-spam measure, looks useful for AN :)

It may be shortsighted of me to say so, but I don't really see how it'd be useful... We just ban spambots and trolls.

Wait, we're supposed to ban them?  I thought we were supposed to just eat them...  Oops sorry.

You ATE the [censored] spambot??? :o

I need a puke emoticon.


Edit: I decided I didn't want anyone unfamiliar with this term to go and google it, so I censored myself just in case...

Moderator action: removed real name, sorry for the inconvenience
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on August 03, 2011, 12:30:53 am
While we are all here, is respect working properly or is it abit out of whack?

Seems to be working.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: taiga on August 03, 2011, 12:41:49 am
just gotta put it out there..
this new look really sucks old one was way better and always will be
maybe u could revert to the 'old-look' whilst keeping any technical changes?

Well, when we first switched over, lots of people were glowing about the new layout - without even realising that this is the new stock standard SMF 2 layout.

There are plans for a custom forum skin, but aesthetics are the least of our concerns at the moment, especially when pretty much everyone has said that it looks adequate as is.
this is madness

(http://www.jonlee.ca/images/Sparta.gif)

Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: jane1234 on August 03, 2011, 05:26:04 pm
While we are all here, is respect working properly or is it abit out of whack?

Seems to be working.

A fair few of my posts have "no one has voted yet" even if it is +2 or whatever... and my respect hasn't changed since the upgrade.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on August 03, 2011, 05:47:46 pm
While we are all here, is respect working properly or is it abit out of whack?

Seems to be working.

A fair few of my posts have "no one has voted yet" even if it is +2 or whatever... and my respect hasn't changed since the upgrade.

Paste a link to one of the posts please.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: jane1234 on August 03, 2011, 06:18:05 pm
While we are all here, is respect working properly or is it abit out of whack?

Seems to be working.

A fair few of my posts have "no one has voted yet" even if it is +2 or whatever... and my respect hasn't changed since the upgrade.

Paste a link to one of the posts please.

Re: we're in safe hands 8)
Re: ACER Practice Test Score
Re: ACER Practice Test Score
Re: Equilibrium Question
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on August 03, 2011, 06:32:47 pm
Yeh mine went up by 2 when it should have gone up by one, then back down to what It should have been after the upgrade, but hasn't changed since. Just to check, is it still 3 up votes for 1 respect plus 0.2 for each vote after that or do I just have it all wrong?

If thats right, then this didn't change Re: ssNake's Chemistry [u2] Q's
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: jane1234 on August 03, 2011, 06:35:04 pm
Yeah this didn't change mine either:

Re: Exam stats + grades

EDIT: Um... why did my respect just drop by 19?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on August 03, 2011, 06:51:29 pm
Yeah this didn't change mine either:

Re: Exam stats + grades

EDIT: Um... why did my respect just drop by 19?

Because you're impatient! :p I ran some tests. Respect is working properly. However, post scores were cached from before the upgrade... Since the whole respect system was redone... Those were all wrong. Had to recount all the post scores... However... That changed the member respect scores to what they should be currently if previous respect scores from the old forum weren't taken into account. So I ported respect scores from my most recent backup back over. Everything should be okay now.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on August 03, 2011, 06:57:55 pm
Ahhhhhhhh, dam by best post now went from +27 to +1 now :(. Still have the respect, it just doesn't look as good now.
Practice Exam Tracker And Statistics (Spreadsheet) V3.1415926535 - More Subjects
Oh well, thanks for checking/fixing it up.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on August 03, 2011, 07:01:49 pm
Ahhhhhhhh, dam by best post now went from +27 to +1 now :(. Still have the respect, it just doesn't look as good now.
Practice Exam Tracker And Statistics (Spreadsheet) V3.1415926535 - More Subjects
Oh well, thanks for checking/fixing it up.

Yeah sorry. Old posts just fail on the new system. =/ Everything should be fine from here on out though.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: jane1234 on August 03, 2011, 07:02:41 pm
Yeah this didn't change mine either:

Re: Exam stats + grades

EDIT: Um... why did my respect just drop by 19?

Because you're impatient! :p I ran some tests. Respect is working properly. However, post scores were cached from before the upgrade... Since the whole respect system was redone... Those were all wrong. Had to recount all the post scores... However... That changed the member respect scores to what they should be currently if previous respect scores from the old forum weren't taken into account. So I ported respect scores from my most recent backup back over. Everything should be okay now.

Haha okay thanks :)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on August 03, 2011, 07:05:56 pm
Ahhhhhhhh, dam by best post now went from +27 to +1 now :(. Still have the respect, it just doesn't look as good now.
Practice Exam Tracker And Statistics (Spreadsheet) V3.1415926535 - More Subjects
Oh well, thanks for checking/fixing it up.
Yeah sorry. Old posts just fail on the new system. =/ Everything should be fine from here on out though.
Just out of interest, does that mean people can vote for those same posts again, and it will count?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on August 03, 2011, 07:09:51 pm
Ahhhhhhhh, dam by best post now went from +27 to +1 now :(. Still have the respect, it just doesn't look as good now.
Practice Exam Tracker And Statistics (Spreadsheet) V3.1415926535 - More Subjects
Oh well, thanks for checking/fixing it up.
Yeah sorry. Old posts just fail on the new system. =/ Everything should be fine from here on out though.
Just out of interest, does that mean people can vote for those same posts again, and it will count?

Si senor.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Russ on August 03, 2011, 07:18:41 pm
That's been the case since the upgrade though
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Fyrefly on August 03, 2011, 09:34:02 pm
That's been the case since the upgrade though

This.

I pointed it out ages ago.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: b^3 on August 03, 2011, 09:35:01 pm
That's been the case since the upgrade though

This.

I pointed it out ages ago.
Sorry I must have missed it.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Thu Thu Train on August 03, 2011, 09:41:11 pm
Something needs to be done about the religious threads. All they do is turn into circular arguments and nothing goes anywhere with the debate.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: nacho on October 23, 2011, 09:49:36 pm
anyway to check which of our posts recently received +rep?
I get curious every time my rep goes up and i have no idea why :D
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on October 25, 2011, 02:47:21 am
anyway to check which of our posts recently received +rep?
I get curious every time my rep goes up and i have no idea why :D


It is on the todo list. Real life has been trying to kill me lately. I'll get to it soon I promise! :p
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: shinny on December 21, 2011, 09:07:43 pm
With the note system, could we perhaps add a sort by rating or sort by downloads option? The current sort functions don't provide any means of sorting by quality.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: enwiabe on December 21, 2011, 11:46:35 pm
With the note system, could we perhaps add a sort by rating or sort by downloads option? The current sort functions don't provide any means of sorting by quality.

David get on this plz. Also let me sort tutors by unapproved.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: shinny on December 21, 2011, 11:53:16 pm
Also let me sort tutors by unapproved.

You can already do that. Just press search and sort by approved is the default for us. Just put it on low to high to see the unapproved ones.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on December 22, 2011, 04:49:22 am
Also let me sort tutors by unapproved.

You can already do that. Just press search and sort by approved is the default for us. Just put it on low to high to see the unapproved ones.

Yep.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on December 22, 2011, 04:49:43 am
With the note system, could we perhaps add a sort by rating or sort by downloads option? The current sort functions don't provide any means of sorting by quality.

David get on this plz.

Good point.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: shinny on December 23, 2011, 02:43:09 am
Could you fix up the location of the 'Rate the impact that this service had on your marks' section on the tutoring review form. E.g. Here's mine. Not sure if it's just because I'm on Chrome, but I've tested it using the IE plug-in and it appears a bit on the side. I've had several students accidentally miss that box due to its location and give me a 1 on it (presumably missed it at least :P).
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on December 23, 2011, 08:23:31 am
Could you fix up the location of the 'Rate the impact that this service had on your marks' section on the tutoring review form. E.g. Here's mine. Not sure if it's just because I'm on Chrome, but I've tested it using the IE plug-in and it appears a bit on the side. I've had several students accidentally miss that box due to its location and give me a 1 on it (presumably missed it at least :P).

Weird. Never noticed that before... Anyway, it's fixed.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: WhoTookMyUsername on January 03, 2012, 04:29:21 pm
Any thoughts about my suggestion to have a "tutoring renewal" pop up once every 3 or 4 months? (only active users will see this). I can see the tutor section becoming extremely clogged in a few years, with a lot of these people having discontinued tutoring.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: enwiabe on January 03, 2012, 07:34:10 pm
Any thoughts about my suggestion to have a "tutoring renewal" pop up once every 3 or 4 months? (only active users will see this). I can see the tutor section becoming extremely clogged in a few years, with a lot of these people having discontinued tutoring.

That is a brilliant idea. I think once per year is probably a better, less annoying timeframe, but we'll certainly have that so that tutors who aren't active will be removed from the listing.

David, put this on the very bottom of your to-do list because while it's a good idea, it can easily wait :P

Run a script that requires tutors to renew their ads on 1st of January, 20xx every year. This will take the form of a forced message on login. "We notice that you have a tutoring ad listed with us. If you are still tutoring, please hit 'renew' to keep your tutoring ad in our listing. If you're no longer tutoring please hit 'cancel' to cancel your tutor listing."

People will have until the 1st of March to hit 'renew'. Anyone who hasn't renewed by 1st of March has their listing deleted, along with anyone who hit 'cancel'.

Make sure your script doesn't delete people who signed up from 1st January to 1st March of that year (just envisioning if you put a 0 or a 1 in a renew column in the DB, a new person signing up wouldn't have renewed etc.)
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: WhoTookMyUsername on January 03, 2012, 08:22:01 pm
ah the fuzzy feeling after enwiabe gives you praise :X

Is there a "remove add" button ATM? i noticed one tutorial advertisement just changed the info to "no longer offering" - does this mean you cannot delete ATM ?
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: Russ on January 06, 2012, 09:45:11 am
There's delete functionality, but it's not available to the tutors. Not sure why, possibly to prevent people from making/deleting without good reason
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: paulsterio on January 06, 2012, 10:22:26 am
I reckon there should be a delete functionality!
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: DavidB3ck on January 06, 2012, 02:04:41 pm
I reckon there should be a delete functionality!

PM us if you want it deleted. <3 I have reasons for not adding it... I don't remember what those reasons are at the moment... But I do have reasons! I think.
Title: Re: Suggestions for changes in SMF 2.0
Post by: nacho on May 07, 2012, 10:37:57 pm
embed youtube links