Good Day
1) For subjects with a low number of enrollments such as Latin.. for example, does the top scorer in the subject always get a 50 or is it based on how well this cohort did relative to the last or even a VCAA difficulty assumption of the exam? If you look at the High Achievers (http://www.theage.com.au/national/tertiary-high-achievers) the highest scorer received 49 - does this mean someone got 50 who didn't allow publishing of their name or the highest was 49?
2) As we are all "weighting" for our results, Spoiler
see what I did there, it can't be unseen
the methods exam 1 is worth 22% and the second 44%. Does this mean that losing 4 marks in exam 1 is equivalent to losing 4 in exam 2 or are the weighted according to their relative difficulty based on A+ cutoffs and whatnot?
Prediction: 85.5/90 exam 1 (SOM) and 89/90 exam 2, ranked probably top 5 in a weak cohort which had 4-6 A+s in the mid year
Thank you for your time good forum folk and may you achieve what ever it is you want, I believe in you.