ATAR Notes: Forum

HSC Stuff => HSC History => HSC Humanities Stuff => HSC Subjects + Help => HSC Ancient History => Topic started by: roshanajabbour on October 11, 2016, 06:50:02 pm

Title: Analysing sources
Post by: roshanajabbour on October 11, 2016, 06:50:02 pm
When analysing sources, what are the main things that should be included?
e.g. bias, origin etc
Title: Re: Analysing sources
Post by: midorinomizu on October 11, 2016, 07:08:38 pm
It would depend on what the question is asking you. For example, if given a Mosaic for Pompeii and Herculaneum you might be asked to state what it shows about the economy or architecture, if you know what I mean. But in short answers always refer back to the question. If it helps, label in the source booklet with things relevant to what your trying to find. It helps organise your thoughts and even develop more if needed.
Title: Re: Analysing sources
Post by: vyca on October 11, 2016, 09:04:30 pm
Yeah for written sources as you said bias, origin, time they were writing (after or during), whether they were critical about the sources they used to form their writings (so if they're reliable), their purpose (e.g. Julius caesar's book the gallic wars was to glorify himself and justify his actions)