ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: lynt.br on October 05, 2009, 05:17:52 pm
-
Could someone please explain why
^b)
Thanks in advance.
-
^{\frac{1}{a}}=x^{\frac{b}{a}}=(x^{\frac{1}{a}})^{b}=(\sqrt[a]{x})^{b})
I'm sure others could show it using a much prettier proof, but that's basically showing it through the index law of multiplying powers when you've got a power to another power.
-


-
For
-
For 
Serious? I thought you could have
-
Cheers guys, makes sense now.
-
notice that for natural numbers:
(there are
numbers as seen from the subscript). (ask for proof of this if not convinced, I will leave that as a seperate matter)
If 
Then the first equation gives:
(
terms)
^b)^a=xxxxxxxx...)
^b)^a=x^b)
rooting both sides:
^b=^a\sqrt{x^b})
Fractional exponents are the much easier way, and in fact you should use them and forget about ath root notation, since the notation of fractional exponents has so much theory loaded into it that it suggests all these non-trivial properties as trivial. However the above argument provides the logical foundations for using fractional exponents and gives motivation for developing theory of them.
-
For 
Serious? I thought you could have ^{\frac{6}{3}})
While true for certain values of
,
. In general you can't conclude that
for 
e.g.
-
For 
Serious? I thought you could have ^{\frac{6}{3}})
While true for certain values of
,
. In general you can't conclude that
for 
e.g.
^2}\neq(\sqrt[2]{-2})^2)
But if true for certain values then you can not say for all 
EDIT: "say"
-
For 
Serious? I thought you could have ^{\frac{6}{3}})
While true for certain values of
,
. In general you can't conclude that
for 
e.g.
^2}\neq(\sqrt[2]{-2})^2)
But if true for certain values then you can not for all 
What do you mean?
-


^b )
For 
But if for certain values of x satisfies the expression, then you can't say x must be
-
I didn't say that you must have
. It is simply a subset of the values
can take.
However, if you want to make
negative then you must simultaneously introduce restrictions on
and
which can make things very tricky.
You cannot simply say
for all x if you get my drift.
-
For 
implies you mean for all 
or why would you even mention a subset of the domain?
It's like saying you got
with no restriction yet I'm gonna put
after it since it's a subset.
Soz I'm just not getting the point if you know what I mean.
-
For 
implies you mean for all 
Gee, I think you're right about that.
It is defined for all
right, so there's nothing wrong about that?
It is all we will need to worry in VCE, and if you want to write up the restrictions for
and
, be my guest.
-
Yes it is defined but I don't see the point of writing it, like I said
is defined for
right? But why would you even put a subset after the expression.
-
Just so you people know that it isn't always defined for
... I'm not saying Flaming Arrow needed to or anything like that, I was just adding information about the values of
for which the equation is guaranteed to work
-
Oh, I thought you meant it as the implied domain.
ie,
,