ATAR Notes: Forum

VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Specialist Mathematics => Topic started by: mystikal on October 16, 2009, 10:48:21 pm

Title: is it strange?
Post by: mystikal on October 16, 2009, 10:48:21 pm
is it strange for me to be doing betta in my spesh trials than my methods?
Title: Re: is it strange?
Post by: dekoyl on October 16, 2009, 10:52:02 pm
How much is the difference? If you're talking about 38/40, 78/80 for specialist and 20/40, 45/80 for methods then yes, it is a little weird. I'm guessing it's the probability and little things in methods that's creating the difference in marks?
Title: Re: is it strange?
Post by: shinny on October 16, 2009, 10:55:26 pm
is it strange for me to be doing betta in my spesh trials than my methods?

I actually had the same. My raws on spesh SACs were far higher than mine for methods, and this trend continued initially into my trial exams but went away after I actually got enough practise with probability and stopped making stupid mistakes in general. For some reason, I was much less prone to careless errors with spesh, but I definitely also knew the course material better.
Title: Re: is it strange?
Post by: TonyHem on October 16, 2009, 10:57:17 pm
I think it's weird.
My MM scores are way above my spesh ones =\
Title: Re: is it strange?
Post by: mystikal on October 16, 2009, 11:00:02 pm
How much is the difference? If you're talking about 38/40, 78/80 for specialist and 20/40, 45/80 for methods then yes, it is a little weird. I'm guessing it's the probability and little things in methods that's creating the difference in marks?

its actually 34/40, 65/80 spesh and 28/40, 50/80 methods hahah == the difference is still big guess im weird.. . . its not probability lols im ok at the that