ATAR Notes: Forum

VCE Stuff => VCE Science => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Chemistry => Topic started by: khalil on October 23, 2009, 08:05:22 pm

Title: Assessment report is out
Post by: khalil on October 23, 2009, 08:05:22 pm

Some people actually got FULL MARKS for this exam http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/chemistry/assessreports/2009/chemistry_assessrep_june09.pdf

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: /0 on October 23, 2009, 08:09:53 pm

holy shit about time

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: methodsboy on October 23, 2009, 08:10:09 pm

WAT?!
full marks! WTF?!

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: StringFever on October 24, 2009, 11:06:52 am

Quote from: khalil on October 23, 2009, 08:05:22 pm

Some people actually got FULL MARKS for this exam

Just died a little on the inside :(

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: StringFever on October 24, 2009, 11:11:29 am

Is it just me, or does the chief examiner seem very keen to defend the Chem paper. :P

For example:
"Questions were consistent with the requirements of the new study design." - READ: It was relevant, stop bitching about the question (esp the last one about the supposed back gravimetric analysis)

"and some students achieved full marks" - READ: Told 'ya so (see above)

"This was a very thorough examination which probed real understanding." - READ: Not our problem if you found the questions challenging, afterall they are allegedly in the study design...

"many students found time to be a limiting factor." - READ: OK, maybe the paper was a bit of a long bitch...

:)
Hope this report gives closure to all the Chem students out there :)

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: IntoTheNewWorld on October 24, 2009, 11:14:39 am

Hmm I don't understand most of the questions anymore >_>

I <3 huge A+ range

Title: Re: Assessment report is out
Post by: arthurk on October 24, 2009, 01:55:04 pm

Quote from: StringFever on October 24, 2009, 11:11:29 am

Is it just me, or does the chief examiner seem very keen to defend the Chem paper. :P

For example:
"Questions were consistent with the requirements of the new study design." - READ: It was relevant, stop bitching about the question (esp the last one about the supposed back gravimetric analysis)

"and some students achieved full marks" - READ: Told 'ya so (see above)

"This was a very thorough examination which probed real understanding." - READ: Not our problem if you found the questions challenging, afterall they are allegedly in the study design...

"many students found time to be a limiting factor." - READ: OK, maybe the paper was a bit of a long bitch...

:)
Hope this report gives closure to all the Chem students out there :)

lol that is also what i thought when i read it