ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Mathematical Methods CAS => Topic started by: chuckjefster90 on November 04, 2009, 04:19:26 pm
-
what wud i need to get GA wise for 35 or over SS?
-
I heard for both exams, you need an A or a high B+. Am I right on this one?
-
My friend got that SS with all A's.
-
i heard u have to be related to the chief examiner or polish his shoes to get above 35
-
i heard u have to be related to the chief examiner or polish his shoes to get above 35
'i tried to laugh but nothing came out...'
long live kurrymuncher! hahaha
-
I heard for both exams, you need an A or a high B+. Am I right on this one?
A,B+ (exam 1 ), A (exam 2) = 35
OR
A,A,A = 35
-
A, A+, B+ = 36
Not sure about the high/low/medium-ness of the grades though.
-
wat do u need for a 40??
is it exam 1: A+ and exam 2: A+
-
wat do u need for a 40??
is it exam 1: A+ and exam 2: A+
or exam 1: A, exam 2: A+
or maybe super high sacs, exam 1: A+, exam 2: A
-
just a question directed at people who do specialist. if for example they ask a question in the exam and dont specify the method to be used can we use a method from the specialist course. example. second deriviative to find nature of stationary point.
-
just a question directed at people who do specialist. if for example they ask a question in the exam and dont specify the method to be used can we use a method from the specialist course. example. second deriviative to find nature of stationary point.
no...especially since the second derivative as it is not part of the methods course. according to an examiner, methods must be shown which can be related back to what has been taught in the course.
harsh yes, and frankly the second derivative method should be in the methods course anyhow (hassle-free compared to some sloppy gradient table)
-
just a question directed at people who do specialist. if for example they ask a question in the exam and dont specify the method to be used can we use a method from the specialist course. example. second deriviative to find nature of stationary point.
I was told you can use any method you want but if it isn't apart of the course then you won't get any method/consequential marks if you happen to get it wrong.
-
I was told you can use any method you want but if it isn't apart of the course then you won't get any method/consequential marks if you happen to get it wrong.
+1
-
I got 35 in Methods last year, and I got:
SAC Averages: A+
Exam 1: B+ (completely stuffed it up O_o)
Exam 2: A (that's better!! :P)
SS: 35 (scaled to: 42)
All the best for your exams. :)
-
why 35?
-
just a question directed at people who do specialist. if for example they ask a question in the exam and dont specify the method to be used can we use a method from the specialist course. example. second deriviative to find nature of stationary point.
no...especially since the second derivative as it is not part of the methods course. according to an examiner, methods must be shown which can be related back to what has been taught in the course.
harsh yes, and frankly the second derivative method should be in the methods course anyhow (hassle-free compared to some sloppy gradient table)
I think your wrong, its as THem has stated, I know ive used spesh method in sacs before and have gotten full marks.
And btw, the difficulty for getting a 35 is moderately hard, on a scale of 1-10 it wud be 7.5
-
i find exam 1 ridiculously easy now :P. nah jk. they're just not as bad as exam 2 imo. exam 1 i can pull off a 34-40/40. exam 2 = crash and burn. 50-60/80 :S. think i can get a 35+? sacs on 57/100 :S
-
They drag your sac marks up/down 'greatly' depending on your exams.
Say on Sacs your getting B/B+/C average out to B . and on exams you get 1 A+ (Ex1) and An A (Exam 2)
Then your will get bumped up to an B+ / A depending on your performance on the exams.
Hence Exams are crucial !
why 35?
-
from what i got told. If they don't specify the method then any will do. But if they say something like solve using calculus. then u have to use calculus and etc.. not specialist.