ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Specialist Mathematics => Topic started by: Martoman on March 03, 2010, 09:30:49 pm
-
So i'm bored and want to determine if the altitudes of a triangle are indeed concurrent by vector methods.
I have http://img685.imageshack.us/i/prooconf.jpg/
Half of the problem was getting it into this form and declaring those vectors.
Now from that diagram i know that
is perpendicular to AC.
=0 )

Hence 
Similarly for the other side BC 
Hrmmm, now I am wondering where to go from here.
I was thinking along the lines of  = |a| \cdot |c| cos(\theta))
Then 
and similarly 
Then they all intersect at the same point, but I think this reasoning is fallacious as it assumes the angles to be the same.... correct?
If this doesn't work, then where to go?
-
correct: you can't assume the
are equal.
A good way to finish it is to stretch out the line segment
so that it hits
. This is vector is basically
there
is a non-zero real number (scale factor).
Now you wish to show
is perpendicular to
, so try to do a dot product again.
Great start on the proof btw, I remember comming up with something similair for this one:
"Prove that if the midpoint of each line segment is connected to the point on the opposite side, then these three line segments are concurrent"
-
Yes that was where I started as well with that proof "prove that the medians of a triangle are concurrent". That was bitchy, but a bit easier than this one.
-
correct: you can't assume the
are equal.
A good way to finish it is to stretch out the line segment
so that it hits
. This is vector is basically
there
is a non-zero real number (scale factor).
Now you wish to show
is perpendicular to
, so try to do a dot product again.
Great start on the proof btw, I remember comming up with something similair for this one:
"Prove that if the midpoint of each line segment is connected to the point on the opposite side, then these three line segments are concurrent"
I may be being silly here.... given its 1 in the freaking morning... but if
perp to AB means
Then the lambda just gets canceled out.
-
yeah true, just makes the expression easier. I pointed out
is non-zero, and that is why you can 'cancel' it.
-
Oh. Disgusting. Interestingly, i just thought if you inscribe it in a circle then instantly |a|=|b|=|c| but it isn't a vector proof. Fuck my creativity.