ATAR Notes: Forum
VCE Stuff => VCE Mathematics => VCE Mathematics/Science/Technology => VCE Subjects + Help => VCE Specialist Mathematics => Topic started by: Navman on November 02, 2008, 07:14:03 pm
-
I am stressing out as haven't done enough preperation. So I thought to ask .
-
they'll probably be questions about complex numbers that i always get confused over how to approach answering LOL and dynamics/mechanics. i'm almost getting the hang of them (a little too late though now...)
hopefully we get a trig identities 'prove that' question. i'm good at them. although in saying that i've probably jinxed myself...
good luck!
-
I assume theres going to be a integration question with initial conditions y(1)=0 or somehting. And anoter that says find an antiderivative. A man pulling a rope at x degrees to horizontal find acceleration(could be on an incline). A graphing question dont forget to show the y=0 asymptote. And so on...Oh and my teacher said there might be a vector proof in there cause there was none last year.
Have fun
-
we can pretty much say one question from each chapter(from the heinamenn) book maybe two on integration
-
i reckon something with tannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ANYTHING... but SOMETHING with tan...
-
Hmm, do you think that if a topic has appeared in both of the last two years...
such as volume of solids of revolutions, cartesian equation of a position vector, and implicit differentiation...
Will it be more likely to appear again because these are the types of questions they want to test in exam 1?
Or will it be less likely to appear again as they have already been in the exam the previous 2 years?
And awwww, i hope you'll go ok tomorrow Navman.
Your definitely better off than me :P I only learnt half the course lol.
-
They will put questions that were done poorly on previous exams.
-
Hmm, do you think that if a topic has appeared in both of the last two years...
such as volume of solids of revolutions, cartesian equation of a position vector, and implicit differentiation...
Will it be more likely to appear again because these are the types of questions they want to test in exam 1?
Or will it be less likely to appear again as they have already been in the exam the previous 2 years?
i think they will come again just with a different twist to them
-
Hmm, do you think that if a topic has appeared in both of the last two years...
such as volume of solids of revolutions, cartesian equation of a position vector, and implicit differentiation...
Will it be more likely to appear again because these are the types of questions they want to test in exam 1?
Or will it be less likely to appear again as they have already been in the exam the previous 2 years?
ZOMG!!! I HOPE THEY PUT ALL 3!!!
I LOVE THAT STUFF!!
implicit, solids of rev and turn to cartesian :smitten:
-
Hmm, do you think that if a topic has appeared in both of the last two years...
such as volume of solids of revolutions, cartesian equation of a position vector, and implicit differentiation...
Will it be more likely to appear again because these are the types of questions they want to test in exam 1?
Or will it be less likely to appear again as they have already been in the exam the previous 2 years?
ZOMG!!! I HOPE THEY PUT ALL 3!!!
I LOVE THAT STUFF!!
implicit, solids of rev and turn to cartesian :smitten
Haha me too, they're like the ONLY things i can do lolz :P
But yeah, i'm just worried coz they've used it the last 2 years they wont put it on the exam again :(
-
Theres prolly gonna be a slightly hard trig integration question maybe like
or something similar as i havnt seen them test that before
-
Hmm, do you think that if a topic has appeared in both of the last two years...
such as volume of solids of revolutions, cartesian equation of a position vector, and implicit differentiation...
Will it be more likely to appear again because these are the types of questions they want to test in exam 1?
Or will it be less likely to appear again as they have already been in the exam the previous 2 years?
ZOMG!!! I HOPE THEY PUT ALL 3!!!
I LOVE THAT STUFF!!
implicit, solids of rev and turn to cartesian :smitten
Haha me too, they're like the ONLY things i can do lolz :P
But yeah, i'm just worried coz they've used it the last 2 years they wont put it on the exam again :(
you confident with implicit now? thats great to hear! ... i probably didnt help, but hinder you ^^
would complex and vectors definitly be on? like if they put r(t) [vector type questions...( diff and antidiff. ) ] would their be heaps on other vector stuff?
naww now im not so confident...
-
Theres prolly gonna be a slightly hard trig integration question maybe like
or something similar as i havnt seen them test that before
dont u just let u = one of then... and one is the derivative and then go fourth?
or break up the sin bit or something? ...
-
yeh let u= cosx and break that sin^3x to (1-cos^2x)(sinx)
-
you confident with implicit now? thats great to hear! ... i probably didnt help, but hinder you ^^
would complex and vectors definitly be on? like if they put r(t) [vector type questions...( diff and antidiff. ) ] would their be heaps on other vector stuff?
naww now im not so confident...
Hmm, not that confident with implicit, but i like solids of rev coz thats just purely following a simple formula and cartesian seems easy. I can sorta do complex numbers a bit now too i think...hmmm
I'm so gonna cry if its gonna be all different stuff this year coz i haven't studied for them...i'll probs get under 10 :P rofl
-
Moved to http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,6829.0.html
-
i think the things u listed are the most common things that fit the criteria for Exam 1... and i will be expecting those
they will most likely twist questions that are similar to last year... thats my wild guess
adding on....
watch out for "the" antiderivative and "an" antiderivative..
can lose u a mark
-
Would you lose marks if you dont draw a table for the slope field cause i usually just do that in my head...However i dont think it will be on it this time, just a feeling..
-
nah i wouldnt think so
but i do think it will be on it... last year slope field was not done well, with "quite a few students had no idea how to tackle [the question]... they did not know what a slope field was."
-
Would you lose marks if you dont draw a table for the slope field cause i usually just do that in my head...However i dont think it will be on it this time, just a feeling..
Read my post again. Write down the table! It is needed and even if they don't mark on it (which I think they will), it'll provide a clearer understanding of the slope of the line that you need to draw. Don't be lazy because you can do it in your head. If I did that with the exam tomorrow, I'd lose 50% of the marks.
-
ummm what do you guys mean by drawing a table for slopefield?
i didnt really get it coz we skimmed through it coz we were tight on schedual :(
-
OK thanks i guess it wouldnt hurt to draw up a table...Also nice pickup on the integrate of arccos(x).
-
This is what I mean...
Edit: fixed...
-
the last slope is 4
-
lol
-
This is what I mean...
Edit: fixed...
but then what do u do with that table? like how do u determine what gradient the line is at and stuff?
like everyone knows its a paraobla??
but get my question?
-
well with that table, you know whether the gradient is positive or negative, and thus you can plot that on the plane.
-
There's probably going to be a "Sketch the graph of y=[insert inverse/reciprocal circular function]" question
-
There's probably going to be a "Sketch the graph of y=[insert inverse/reciprocal circular function]" question
i was thinking that to just a few moments ago. because its never a question done really well!
and its been on heaps of the past exams too!
so im pretty well prepared for that q now :)
-
IS THERE SUCH THING AS A 5+ MARK QUESTION?!?!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!??!!?!?!?
( not in parts )
-
Hopefully not, but it isn't unheard of.
-
I saw one in the tsfx exams
-
I hear they are going to make up approximate
to 10 decimal places using a power series.
-
sweet id love that to be on the exam
-
sweet id love that to be on the exam
lol yeah. I wish there will be alot of calc [like the previous trig integral q that fredrick gave]. I seriously suck at complex relations and kinematics :(
Read the assessment report for 2007:
Areas of weakness included:
• poor algebraic skills. This was evident in several questions, and the inability to simplify expressions often
prevented students from completing a question
• showing a given result, which was required in Question 2a. The onus is on students to include sufficient
correct and relevant working to convince the assessors that they do know how to derive the result. Just as
importantly, students should be reminded that they can use a given value in the remaining part(s) of the
question, whether or not they were able to derive it
• recognising the need to use the chain rule when differentiating implicitly (Question 3)
• recognising the need to use the product rule when differentiating (Question 3)
• recognising the method of integration required (Questions 4 and 8b.)
• recognising the need for an arbitrary constant when integrating (Questions 6a., 7b. and 8b.)
• recognising the need to use a double angle formula (Question 10a.)
• knowing the exact values for circular functions (Questions 1, 6a. and 8b.)
• giving answers in the required form (Questions 1, 5b., 7a., 7b. and 9).
and check the questions that most of the state got wrong [eg. euler and the 2nd last q]. :)