Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 01:18:16 pm

Author Topic: SL'ers 2009  (Read 12371 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lacoste

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 973
  • Respect: +2
SL'ers 2009
« on: January 24, 2009, 06:10:47 pm »
0
Are there any Chinese SL'ers this year ?


TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2009, 10:57:10 pm »
0
me me

elle.123

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Respect: 0
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2009, 08:24:13 pm »
0
i am one

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2009, 08:58:34 pm »
0
Hoping for about 35-40 :)
I wonder if it'll scale by 12 at 30 this yr too.

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2009, 12:01:02 am »
0
For the past two years (2007 & 2008), Chinese SL has been scaled up by 12 if you got 30.  I had a look at the 2006 Scaling Report and apparently it only got scaled up by 11.

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2009, 02:42:24 pm »
0
last year it was scaled +12 for SL and +10 for SLA. Hopefully that stays this year ^.^
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2009, 06:45:27 pm »
0
last year it was scaled +12 for SL and +10 for SLA. Hopefully that stays this year ^.^

Yes, for the past two years it has stayed the same so I'm predicting it should stay the same (or increase if you're lucky).

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

liv

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
  • Respect: +1
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2009, 08:42:45 pm »
0
i'm doing sl too....are you guys background students or not?
i'm most definitely not, but i go to chinese school on saturdays to get extra pratice. its so hard!
and i'm having so much trouble with my detailed study. i am going to be so glad when its over. hopefully i can do an extension course in chinese next year though XD
2009: chinese SL(43-->50), methods CAS(not as good as chinese)

2010: english(41), methods CAS(40-->45), specialist(32-->39), biology(43-->44), chemistry(38-->42).

2011: Biomedical science and peace and conflict studies

elle.123

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Respect: 0
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2009, 10:34:52 pm »
0
wow, you must be really good to be a non-background student to go to chinese school. But I have heard that non-background kids will get marked more easily, so don't worry.

iheartu

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 42
  • Respect: +1
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2009, 02:21:13 pm »
0
omg i stuffed up first sac (writing which is like worth 10%)! If i do quite well in everything else except my first sac... would it still be possible to get a 40 or above?

haha liv... i finally found someone who is wanting to do the chinese extension course as well! i really wanna get in ! :)


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2009, 02:27:21 pm »
0
omg i stuffed up first sac (writing which is like worth 10%)! If i do quite well in everything else except my first sac... would it still be possible to get a 40 or above?

haha liv... i finally found someone who is wanting to do the chinese extension course as well! i really wanna get in ! :)


Ofcourse it is still possible! I did really bad in one SAC as well, [listening which I only got 5/10 LOL].

Your chances of getting 40+ is still very very high, losing a few marks on a SAC really doesn't matter too much, just do your best for the rest of your SACs :). Remember it is the exam and oral that REALLY counts towards your SS.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

liv

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 154
  • Respect: +1
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2009, 09:53:49 pm »
0
my chinese teacher is terrible...yesterday we had our translation/comprehension sac...and he was teaching another class in the same room as us.

yeah i think its weird how white kids get marked easier...but then again not many can actually speak chinese very well. as opposed to aussie-chinese kids who qualify for SL because they've never been to china, but they have chinese parents who speak to them in chinese every day.
2009: chinese SL(43-->50), methods CAS(not as good as chinese)

2010: english(41), methods CAS(40-->45), specialist(32-->39), biology(43-->44), chemistry(38-->42).

2011: Biomedical science and peace and conflict studies

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2009, 10:10:22 pm »
0
I think a white kid got 50 for chink SL last year... hmmmmz?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

arthurk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
  • Respect: +3
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2009, 10:37:53 pm »
0
tis true, white people killing the people in chinese that are actually chinese sighs:(

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: SL'ers 2009
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2009, 10:41:18 pm »
0
Chinese is biased anyway, ruins all the fun.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.