Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 06:28:23 am

Author Topic: .  (Read 57945 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #135 on: July 28, 2010, 08:28:32 pm »
0
^ u dont needa know the sample, u just needa know that if the device used makes no difference, a large enough group would demonstrate the quality of having approx equal numbers of both
i see wat ur saying but the answer you put is what i put for medentry and it was incorrect
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #136 on: July 28, 2010, 08:30:33 pm »
0
hmm...cud be either...
medentry isnt always right, reememeber that..

also, the cards one was 7 of hearts, and the tube was tube 7
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #137 on: July 28, 2010, 08:32:37 pm »
0
oh oh oh, and the asian genetics question, was it neither I or II that supported the theory?
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #138 on: July 28, 2010, 08:32:53 pm »
0
Yeah, card was definitely 7. I drew each shuffle :)

10weid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +1
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #139 on: July 28, 2010, 08:33:33 pm »
0
oh oh oh, and the asian genetics question, was it neither I or II that supported the theory?

yeah neither 1 nor 2
2009: Mathematical Methods CAS 49 | Biology 49
2010: Chemistry 47 | Further Mathematics 48 | English 42 | Specialist Mathematics 43
2010 VCE ATAR 99.65
UMAT: 98th %ile
2012: MBBS I - Monash

*Anyone requiring VCE aid, or HELP GETTING INTO MEDICINE, please don't hesitate to PM me :)*

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #140 on: July 28, 2010, 08:34:34 pm »
0
Yeah, card was definitely 7. I drew each shuffle :)

that is my problem.  once i get stuck, i have no idea how to solve it... and waste shitloads of time in the process.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #141 on: July 28, 2010, 08:36:04 pm »
0
Why did everyone get the same questions?  It would have been pretty easy to cheat, just get people who are smart to tell you heaps of answers, save you loads of time.

That is very poor from ACER.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

akira88

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1030
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #142 on: July 28, 2010, 08:36:29 pm »
0
Yeah, card was definitely 7. I drew each shuffle :)
I drew it out too! 7 as well :)
Omg I swear a few of the questions in sec 1 were familiar, well not the questions, but the information.
2009: Further Maths | Literature
2010: English | Biology | Chemistry | Methods | Psychology
94.50
2011: Pharmacy/Commerce Monash
2012: Second year yo!
Certificate III in Business
Certificate IV in Business Adminstration
Feel free to ask or message me for anything, I don't bite :]

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #143 on: July 28, 2010, 08:36:33 pm »
0
I also got neither for the genetics question.

Looks like we might have actually killed this test :)

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #144 on: July 28, 2010, 08:37:24 pm »
0
oh oh oh, and the asian genetics question, was it neither I or II that supported the theory?
was there 3 options? or only 2

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #145 on: July 28, 2010, 08:38:00 pm »
0
I'm loving your optimism stroodle :)

I still think I screwed it though!
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #146 on: July 28, 2010, 08:38:34 pm »
0
oh oh oh, and the asian genetics question, was it neither I or II that supported the theory?
was there 3 options? or only 2

I thikn there were 3, but the third wasn't part of any of the answers; if I remember correctly..

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #147 on: July 28, 2010, 08:39:24 pm »
0
I thikn there were 3, but the third wasn't part of any of the answers; if I remember correctly..

yeah, that is right...
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #148 on: July 28, 2010, 08:45:35 pm »
0
I'm loving your optimism stroodle :)

I still think I screwed it though!

I seriously reckon you'll get a better score than you think.
There were a lot of people there that wouldn't have performed so well, and everyone found it hard.
Also, I think hardly anyone would go as well as they did on the practice tests. Specially in the sections 2 and 3 of this umat.

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #149 on: July 28, 2010, 08:48:19 pm »
0
yeah, section three was ridiculous. but like I said, will probably be my best, then sec 1, and 2 was a disaster. so long, questions were hard, and so many words i had no idea about the meaning.

the last last question in my book was the one with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 in the pics, but you had to add the shapes to the cumber, so the sequence ended up being 4,5,6,7,8  ?

that was my fave question.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown