Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 09:13:02 am

Author Topic: Gravity and Satellites  (Read 1996 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

methodsboy

  • Guest
Gravity and Satellites
« on: February 27, 2009, 06:26:56 pm »
0
Hey
im in a bit of a pickle with this one:
Neptune has a mass of: 1.02 x 10^26 kg
It's moon, Triton has mass : 2.14 x 10^22 kg and has an orbital radius of 3.55 x 10^8 m
For triton, calculate its:
- orbital acceleration


The answer is 5.40 x 10^-2 m/s^2   but i keep getting it wrong.

Anyone out here willing to help?

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 06:39:40 pm »
0
Mao? True Tears? Edmond?  ANYONE???????

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 06:46:22 pm »
0
orbital acceleration as in centripetal acceleration, i.e. Neptune's gravitational field strength at the orbital radius

Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Edmund

  • Dr. Ruler Snapper
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1849
  • Respect: +95
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2009, 06:47:33 pm »
0
I think:

Use F = G.Mm / r^2

Then, F = ma, where m is mass of Triton


EDIT: Yeah look at Mao's... I don't know how to use Latex...
2007-2008 VCE ATAR 90.15
2009-2011 BSc (Unimelb)
2012-2015 DDS (Unimelb)

Booksale: Drugs That Shape Society, Forests in a Global Context

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2009, 07:58:09 pm »
0
orbital acceleration as in centripetal acceleration, i.e. Neptune's gravitational field strength at the orbital radius


where did u get 6.67E -11 from?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2009, 08:13:24 pm »
0
orbital acceleration as in centripetal acceleration, i.e. Neptune's gravitational field strength at the orbital radius


where did u get 6.67E -11 from?
Remeber G is a constant, better known as universal gravitational constant,
(obviously this is different from g, small case, which is 9.8 )
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2009, 08:15:02 pm »
0
oh LOL sorry.... i was meant to say 1.02 x 10^26.
just realized that M is for the bigger mass hence 1.02 x 10^26
b4 i kept using mass of triton and thats why i didnt get anywhere
Thanks all :)

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Gravity and Satellites
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2009, 08:16:36 pm »
0
oh LOL sorry.... i was meant to say 1.02 x 10^26.
just realized that M is for the bigger mass hence 1.02 x 10^26
yah, remember the M (capital M) is always the mass of the object being orbited. So like for the moon orbiting around the earth, M would be the mass of the earth. Or for earth orbiting around the sun, M would be the mass of the sun.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.