Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 08:57:30 am

Author Topic: If everyone was atheist...  (Read 41177 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #165 on: November 29, 2010, 04:03:47 pm »
0

I think enwiabe's points about uncertainty are very good, but you also have to keep in mind that many atheists are certain about how the world works. It started with the big bang,
Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can.


Spreadbury

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 787
  • Respect: +12
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #166 on: November 29, 2010, 04:09:29 pm »
0

Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can.

I have never heard more fail. How does monotheism claim God came to exist then? He just created himself?
Bachelor of Laws, Deakin

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #167 on: November 29, 2010, 04:09:45 pm »
0

I think enwiabe's points about uncertainty are very good, but you also have to keep in mind that many atheists are certain about how the world works. It started with the big bang,
Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can.

(Image removed from quote.)
hahahah. Just saying
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

enwiabe

  • Putin
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4358
  • Respect: +529
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #168 on: November 29, 2010, 04:50:57 pm »
0
Monotheism makes a guess. It doesn't explain shit

Yitzi_K

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Respect: +3
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #169 on: November 29, 2010, 07:08:07 pm »
0

Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can.

I have never heard more fail. How does monotheism claim God came to exist then? He just created himself?

G-d was never created. He always has existed, and always will.
2009: Legal Studies [41]
2010: English [45], Maths Methods [47], Economics [45], Specialist Maths [41], Accounting [48]

2010 ATAR: 99.60

Maxinquaye

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #170 on: November 29, 2010, 08:26:27 pm »
0
Eriny, a lot of your post needs to be corrected.

I'm going to change the topic a little. A number of pages ago, someone asked if you can be atheist and spiritual. I would say yes, certainly, though I don't think that I'm spiritual as such.
Incoherent statement, I have no idea what you mean when you say the word 'spiritual'.

I think enwiabe's points about uncertainty are very good, but you also have to keep in mind that many atheists are certain about how the world works. It started with the big bang, it's comprised of atoms and energy and such. When you die there is nothing.

Flat out incorrect. By definition, an atheist is merely one who is not persuaded by the claims of theism, nowhere does this view assert certainty, nowhere does it make claims about the big bang, atoms or the possibility of an afterlife. The postulation that 'it all started with the big bang, it's all comprised of atoms, etc" has nothing to do with atheism. nothing.

While I disagree with the way religion gives certainty to the universe, I also disagree that we can speculate what happens after we die. And further, while I definitely believes in the findings of science, I don't think it gives us a full illustration of the world.
Although I don't identify myself as a spiritual person, I am interested in the intangible. In ideas, in metaphysics, I'm interested in things that aren't directly observable.
Terribly weak minded thoughts here, you clearly don't understand the nature of science discovery, things don't need to be directly observable or 'tangible', and ideas are not equivalent to 'metaphysics', ideas may be falsifiable, while metaphysical postulations are by definition unfalsifiable.


God could be one of those things, but I personally believe that the idea of God is much more important then his or her literal existence.
White noise statement, typical of a muddled mind.


What character, (in one form or another or many) boasts quite so much influence over human civilisation? We can see God everywhere in churches and synagogues and mosques,
yes..the interaction between the neuroscience of our infantile desert cult ancestors and their environment produced this (and still does), this is not a mystery, the validity of an immaterial deity is not strengthen by this observation.

but God gets to the heart of our laws, our beliefs, our idea of what's right and wrong. God is in the Declaration of Human Rights as much as he is in the church. Even those who don't believe in God are so deeply influenced by the idea of God, because this idea has so much to do with out culture. Putting on my anthropologist hat here, many of our ideas, particularly pertaining to morality, are based on Judeo-Christian sentiment. God is very real (maybe not literally though).
rather vile babble, 'Judeo-Christian' 'values' where largely plagiarized from ancient, even more arcane peasant religions, they are not the basis of our society or culture or moral system. Humans brains are evolved organs and it follows that our morals are evolved mechanisms, we nee-dent appeal to immaterial or 'spiritual' systems to construct a moral framework.

But anyway, I think that my interest in the humanities, in philosophy, in art, etc. means that I don't see the world in a reductionist kind of way. There's more to the world than its physical/biological/chemical nature.

Pardon? this demarcation between 'humanities' and 'hard sciences' is entirely the product of your own confused little mind, the obvious fact that we are made of material, i.e. the materialist viewpoint, does not necessitate that we cannot appreciate art or literature.
The irony of course is the science you dismiss as 'insuffienct' can explain exactly why you believe that 'there's something more to life than its chemical nature'.

There's beauty and power and emotions and lots of over abstract stuff. For me, this abstract level of intellectual inquiry replaces spirituality for me. That's why I actually identify myself as a Secular Humanist before I see myself as an atheist. I think that there is more to the world than what we can observe, but I don't think that necessarily means that there is a literal God out there who created us and watches over us.

Please don't confuse abstract inquiry with incoherent wishful thinking. Of course there's more to the universe that humans can observe, by our very nature we are imperfectly evolved animals, we are made of, and governed by, atoms, there is no mystery if you do not make one.


Yitzi_K

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
  • Respect: +3
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #171 on: November 29, 2010, 09:26:03 pm »
0
well that's quite some first post...
2009: Legal Studies [41]
2010: English [45], Maths Methods [47], Economics [45], Specialist Maths [41], Accounting [48]

2010 ATAR: 99.60

enwiabe

  • Putin
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4358
  • Respect: +529
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #172 on: November 29, 2010, 09:32:02 pm »
0
well that's quite some first post...

Who was a previously lifebanned member, and has been re-banned. Showed no signs of reform and is still an insulting, condescending person who had previously made far more egregiously insulting comments to other members.

QuantumJG

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1748
  • Applied Mathematics Student at UoM
  • Respect: +82
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #173 on: November 29, 2010, 10:04:37 pm »
0

I think enwiabe's points about uncertainty are very good, but you also have to keep in mind that many atheists are certain about how the world works. It started with the big bang,
Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can.

(Image removed from quote.)

I just had to after seeing this by /0.

This guy looks like my group theory lecturer.

Anyway I accept that atheism can't explain what happened before the Big Bang. Pretty much because all atheists aren't physicists and all physicists aren't atheists. You claim monotheism explains it, but I claim that this is simply a guess since their is no way you can prove this without any counterclaims lowering the validity of this answer.

But seriously facepalm at this answer.
2008: Finished VCE

2009 - 2011: Bachelor of Science (Mathematical Physics)

2012 - 2014: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Physics)

2016 - 2018: Master of Engineering (Civil)

Semester 1:[/b] Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Engineering Risk Analysis, Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering

Semester 2:[/b] Earth Processes for Engineering, Engineering Materials, Structural Theory and Design, Systems Modelling and Design

Kotza

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 762
  • AEK ULTRAS!
  • Respect: +2
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #174 on: November 29, 2010, 11:08:54 pm »
0
My opinion ( a bit late lol )

1. When people think of the "big killers" such as cigarettes and car accidents, they fail to recognise religion as the BIGGEST killer. That being said, it would be acceptable (imo at least) to say that without religion, we would rid of the world's largest killer. However you could raise the argument that the lack of ethics religion provides would cause an increase in hostility and violence, resulting in more deaths. This is most likely correct, but i simply do not believe that an atheistic would surpass the millions of deaths claimed in the name of religion.
2. There are many kind souls out there who do not believe in a god, claiming that religion is the ONLY source of ethics which people abide by would be a grand generalization and shitty argument.
3. Chavi on page 4 or something stated that he finds it strange that atheists who denounce a deity believe in superstitious things such as ghosts etc. I for one believe in supernatural occurrences and am an atheist. This is because religion is so much more in depth in trusting the unknown (faith) than something superstitious. To say "i believe in the human soul remaining on earth" (which i dont believe) is not tantamount to saying "i believe in some God who was invented 50,000 years after human existence with no evidence, always existed and was the creator of this awesome universe because a book says so." So basically all im saying is that religion is such a grand story that requires a great amount of faith in something we have no evidence of whereas believing in something superstitious is perhaps more basic to comprehend.
4. Furthermore on the topic of Chavi's comments, for such an educated and intelligent individual, saying that "Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can." is arguably the most retarded thing ive read on this site. Lets use christianity for an example. The good ol' catholics said that the world was created in 7 days, with god taking a rest on sunday (stupid considering he is omnipotent and wouldnt need a rest, but is convenient for those wanting a day off). but oh shit! They were wrong. They said the world was flat (some quote about the 4 corners of the earth in one of the gospels), but oh they were wrong! And it continues. Religion takes a guess, a guess made by people living in 300 A.D. If people were totally religious we wouldnt have discovered the origin of this universe, and we would still be scared of falling off the edge of the earth.
5. Lastly, i think the human intellect would be so much more advanced. People were subservient to their religious masters, unwilling to question authority in fear that they would be questioning god. Christianity did a lot to fuck up the progress of the human intellect. This is also relevant in strict islamic nations today.

anyways, thats my opinion.

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #175 on: November 30, 2010, 12:07:50 am »
0
4. Furthermore on the topic of Chavi's comments, for such an educated and intelligent individual, saying that "Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can." is arguably the most retarded thing ive read on this site. Lets use christianity for an example. The good ol' catholics said that the world was created in 7 days, with god taking a rest on sunday (stupid considering he is omnipotent and wouldnt need a rest, but is convenient for those wanting a day off). but oh shit! They were wrong. They said the world was flat (some quote about the 4 corners of the earth in one of the gospels), but oh they were wrong! And it continues. Religion takes a guess, a guess made by people living in 300 A.D. If people were totally religious we wouldnt have discovered the origin of this universe, and we would still be scared of falling off the edge of the earth.
My education doesn't extend beyond VCE level, so contrary to the level of my writing style, I am no more educated than most of the posters here.
Secondly, I don't see why the comment is met with such skepticism. Science has no answers beyond the Big Bang - and even that is a relatively new discovery (until the next discovery discredits this one). Monotheism at least provides a theory for the creation of the universe: intelligent design by an omnipotent being unconstrained by time. Keeping in with this thread, obviously faith is require to accept the beliefs mandated in this theory - but it nonetheless provides an answer where science does not (how tenuous that answer is, can be debated).
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

Kotza

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 762
  • AEK ULTRAS!
  • Respect: +2
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #176 on: November 30, 2010, 08:54:18 am »
0
i appreciate the modesty.

Well it is met which such skepticism because that is the way in which i see it.

The perfect response to that comment however is this:
"Faith is not wanting to know what is true." - Nietzsche. Obviously not the most reliable source considering the guy was as much of a pessimist as one can be, but still reflects my views.

And i understand you completely, i was once as religious as any person could be (and believed that theory), but in the words of Martin Luther, "I did not leave the Church, the Church left me." So i get where you are coming from. However, i would rather trust highly intelligent scientists who went to Harvard or whatever and conducted strenuous tests on the origins of the universe based on fact than believing a bunch of animal-sacrificing primitives who lived ~2000 years ago.

Whilst many "factual" theories have been discredited over the ages, at least they are founded with at least a modicum of rationalization and logic (e.g. Aristotle believing the world to be the center of the universe based on the apparentness of the planets rotating around earth and that the world is stable and not moving.)

While that is essentially crap, at least there was some logic involved. This is where religion fails, it has such a lack of proof, "just because a book says so" is perhaps a weak argument.

 

MBBS

  • Guest
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #177 on: November 30, 2010, 09:41:43 am »
0
Kotza, I take offence to your avatar/picture-thingy.

If I was to post something anti-Semite on the forum and question the authenticity of their religion, I would be thrown off the forum, so you should be thrown off. I haven't read this thread but your picture is anti-Christianity and is not respecting everybody's right to a religion.  
« Last Edit: November 30, 2010, 09:48:33 am by MBBS »

MuggedByReality

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 606
  • Respect: +5
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #178 on: November 30, 2010, 09:56:38 am »
0
4. Furthermore on the topic of Chavi's comments, for such an educated and intelligent individual, saying that "Atheism can't explain what came before the big bang. Monotheism can." is arguably the most retarded thing ive read on this site. Lets use christianity for an example. The good ol' catholics said that the world was created in 7 days, with god taking a rest on sunday (stupid considering he is omnipotent and wouldnt need a rest, but is convenient for those wanting a day off). but oh shit! They were wrong. They said the world was flat (some quote about the 4 corners of the earth in one of the gospels), but oh they were wrong! And it continues. Religion takes a guess, a guess made by people living in 300 A.D. If people were totally religious we wouldnt have discovered the origin of this universe, and we would still be scared of falling off the edge of the earth.
My education doesn't extend beyond VCE level, so contrary to the level of my writing style, I am no more educated than most of the posters here.
Secondly, I don't see why the comment is met with such skepticism. Science has no answers beyond the Big Bang - and even that is a relatively new discovery (until the next discovery discredits this one). Monotheism at least provides a theory for the creation of the universe: intelligent design by an omnipotent being unconstrained by time. Keeping in with this thread, obviously faith is require to accept the beliefs mandated in this theory - but it nonetheless provides an answer where science does not (how tenuous that answer is, can be debated).

 Curiously, does one have to expressly believe in God in order to go to your (old) school?
"People living deeply have no fear of death"
                                      -Anais Nin

"In the 2nd grade, they asked us what we wanted to be. I said I wanted to be a ballplayer and they laughed. In the 8th grade they asked the same question and I said a ballplayer again and they laughed a little more. By the 11th grade no one was laughing."
  -Johnny Bench, Hall of Fame baseball player

Kotza

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 762
  • AEK ULTRAS!
  • Respect: +2
Re: If everyone was atheist...
« Reply #179 on: November 30, 2010, 10:49:10 am »
0
I went to a strict Catholic school and there were a couple of Buddhists and many non-religious individuals.

So no. However it would definitely vary according to the specific school.