Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 05:37:41 am

Author Topic: Vicki Roach Case  (Read 6002 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

smithy16

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Respect: +5
Vicki Roach Case
« on: November 06, 2011, 11:54:59 am »
0
For a question regarding the significance of the Vicki Roach case on the protection of rights in Australia, that is worth 4 marks, is there anything else that I could say other than that as the High Court found that Parliament cannot pass laws that unreasonably take away the right to vote of a class of persons, as it would interfere with the principle of representative government; the right to vote was protected.

selim31

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • Respect: -18
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2011, 09:08:37 pm »
0
Can you post the actual question?
Law is a kind of justice. It is not perfect justice, it is only a kind of justice.

- John Young, Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria.

smithy16

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Respect: +5
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2011, 06:06:18 pm »
0
Explain the significance of the High Court case you have selected on the protection of rights in Australia. (4 marks) And the case i am using is the Vicki Roach case.

anastasiastarz

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Wickedly Lovely
  • Respect: 0
  • School: WC
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2011, 01:52:11 am »
0
I find that there's more stuff in other cases. My teacher recommends Koowarta + tas dam.

RobDog

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 190
  • Respect: -1
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2011, 11:45:40 am »
0
I always thought the 'Tasmanian Dams Case' was related to the High Court's interpretation of the Constitution, where as the 'Roach case' is in regards to the protection of rights.
I could be wrong though...

smithy16

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Respect: +5
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2011, 02:39:05 pm »
0
No RobDog your right. The Koowarta and the Franklin Dam's case are more to do with the division of powers between the state and commonwealth. The Roach case is more about how the high courts interpretation protected rights.

mskux19

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Respect: 0
Re: Vicki Roach Case
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2011, 11:03:40 pm »
+1
For a question regarding the significance of the Vicki Roach case on the protection of rights in Australia, that is worth 4 marks, is there anything else that I could say other than that as the High Court found that Parliament cannot pass laws that unreasonably take away the right to vote of a class of persons, as it would interfere with the principle of representative government; the right to vote was protected.

4 marks right?

-Start off with name of case
- Facts (Basic not necessarily thorough)
- Reason for case being bought forward (as you stated above)
- How the decision reflects structural protections (i.e. it is evident that through the findings of the High Court their decision reflects the notion that the structural protection of Representative Government as stated in s.7 and s.24 enshrines the right to vote. The Electoral Amendment was thus declared unconstitutional as it limited the operation of representative government.)
RAW
2010 : Specialist [43]
2011: Literature [44], Legal Studies [50], Chemistry[42], Physics[45], Economics [50]
ATAR: 99.85

2012: Bachelor of Laws/Commerce @ ANU







---------------------------------------------

VCAA Examinations 2011 - "Be safe get 100%"