Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 08:22:31 am

Author Topic: Integration defined or not  (Read 545 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

horizon

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 179
  • Respect: +1
Integration defined or not
« on: November 07, 2011, 09:43:15 pm »
0
Hey, just wondering, if you integrate over an interval of [a,b], but between [a,b], the curve is discontinuous, then is the integral still defined?

Same question, if there is an asymptote between [a,b] but the integral is from a to b, then will it be defined?

Thanks in advance

dc302

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
  • Respect: +53
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: Integration defined or not
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2011, 10:13:58 pm »
0
First one, yes it is still defined.

Second one, technically no it is not defined unless the limit of the integral at the asymptote exists. If it does, it is called an improper integral. If it doesn't exist but both sides of the asymptote 'cancel' out, then it is still not defined but you can define something called a 'principle value' for the integral.

Also, any examples you have would be good.
2012-2015 - Doctor of Medicine (MD) @ UniMelb
2010-2011 - Bachelor of Science (BSc) majoring in Pure Mathematics @ UniMelb
2009 - VCE [99.70] -- Eng [43] - Methods [44] - Chem [44] - JapSL [45] - Spesh [45] - MUEP Jap [5.5]

abeybaby

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
  • Respect: +182
  • School: Scotch College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Integration defined or not
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2011, 10:15:12 pm »
0
what dc said, but with examples :)

Smarter VCE Lectures and Resources

2014-2017: Doctor of Medicine, University of Sydney.
2011-2013: Bachelor of Biomedicine, University of Melbourne. 2010 ATAR: 99.85

horizon

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 179
  • Respect: +1
Re: Integration defined or not
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2011, 08:10:27 am »
0
Thanks!