Hey all,
I have a question that I couldn't solve
Solve for x:
e-x + 3= x
Thanks!

This is an example of what we call a transcendental equation. In general, transcendental equations cannot be solved algebraically. However, you can obtain quite a decent approximation using Newton's method. Newton's method is not on the Methods course, but if you're interested:
Let f(x) = e^(-x) - x + 3. We are required to solve f(x) = 0, which effectively means finding the x-intercept of the graph of y = f(x). First, we guess at an x-intercept. This initial guess does not need to be accurate. All we need is a random initial guess. Suppose that we guess x = 1. Now we note that f(1) does not equal to 0, but that doesn't matter. What we do now is construct the tangent to the curve at x = 1, and then find the x-intercept of the tangent. After a bit of number bashing, you'll find that the x-intercept of the tangent to the curve at x = 1 is x = 2.73105857863... We now let this be our next guess at the x-intercept of the graph of y = f(x). But again, we note that f(2.73105857863...) does not equal to 0, and so again, we construct the tangent to the curve at x = 2.73105857863..., and then find the x-intercept of the tangent, which happens to be x = 3.04471545135... Just as before, we let this be our next guess at the x-intercept of the graph of y = f(x). After you repeat this process a sufficient number of times, you'll find that your guess at the x-intercept of the graph of y = f(x) gets better and better. The actual x-intercept is x = 3.04747849102..., and so you can see that after repeating the process twice, we already have a pretty good approximation.
It's in the methods 3 & 4 Essential Cambridge book
There is a specific question where they ask you for a intersection concerning two graphs: e-x +3 and -loge(x+3)
I figured that if I made e-x +3 =x, I'd find the answer the easier way. 
I'm assuming you mean -ln(x-3) rather than -ln(x+3)?