Fact - methods and specialist are two different subjects, and doing well in one does not dictate how you will do in the other. While it is true that there's a lot of overlap, it is still very possible to get under 30 in one and still get over 40 in the other. In fact, I know someone who matched my methods score, but was quite a bit below me in specialist. Similarly, I know someone who was quite a bit above me in methods, but not so much for specialist. Don't assume that a score of x in methods means you'll get a score of y in specialist.
To do well in specialist takes as much as it does in any other subject - you must understand the material, and be able to apply to any given situation. You don't have to understand the material the moment you've learned it - as long as you understand it by the time you walk into your SAC/exam. I didn't understand curvilinear motion and couldn't do any related questions until about a week before my final exam - still got full marks for mechanics. It doesn't matter if you don't understand things immediately, because barely anybody understands everything immediately. As long as you've got a handle on it when push comes to shove.