Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 06:53:43 am

Author Topic: Biomed or Science?  (Read 9722 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #30 on: December 19, 2011, 12:27:17 am »
0
Two things:

1.  This is true, because ATAR cut off is based on demand and it makes sense that the demand for a course with more limited places is higher than that for one with a greater number of places.

2.  The two in one subjects in Biomed are doubly weighted, I just thought you should know ;D
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM

Thu Thu Train

  • Voted AN's sexiest member 2012
  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 667
  • <3
  • Respect: +336
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #31 on: December 19, 2011, 12:40:52 am »
+10
Biomed is just BSc with a biology based major. It's there to make 98+ kids feel good about not getting into MBBS @ monash.
        (
     '( '
    "'  //}
   ( ''"
   _||__ ____ ____ ____
  (o)___)}___}}___}}___}   
  'U'0 0  0 0  0 0  0 0    0 0
BBSN14

i actually almost wish i was a monash student.

taiga

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4085
  • Respect: +588
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #32 on: December 19, 2011, 12:44:30 am »
0
Biomed is just BSc with a biology based major. It's there to make 98+ kids feel good about not getting into MBBS @ monash.

qft
vce: english, methods, spesh, chemistry, physics, geography.

ex admin/mod/partner

2010: Melbourne High School (VCE)
2011 - 2016: Monash University BComm/BEng (Hons)


If you guys have any concerns/suggestions for making ATARNotes a better place, don't hesitate to PM me.

Panicmode

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 828
  • Respect: +46
  • School: De La Salle College Malvern
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #33 on: December 19, 2011, 12:48:38 am »
+3
Thanks guys for all the suggestions. I suppose I have a lot to think about now. Tomorrow I'm going to this KLD thing at Melbourne and there will be an admissions person there so I think hopeful I'll be able to get some good advice. As it stands, I have biomed first and science second but my reasoning is really fragile. Basically what Stonecold and Slumdawg have said has sold me. It has nothing to do with the fact that I didn't get into MBBS @ Monash; I'm pretty sure that even if I did get in I'd still wanna go to Melbourne. =D
2012 Biomedicine @ UoM

VivaTequila

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +131
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #34 on: December 19, 2011, 12:55:54 am »
0
panicmode are you chris monger?

or tim carracher?

Panicmode

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 828
  • Respect: +46
  • School: De La Salle College Malvern
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #35 on: December 19, 2011, 01:04:23 am »
0
panicmode are you chris monger?

or tim carracher?

Ahhh no. I know those guys if that's what you mean. In all honesty though - and I know how ridiculously snobby/arrogant/mean this sounds - those two are not the type to aspire to medicine. I always pictured them as more into visual design, advertising, marketing - that kind of thing.
2012 Biomedicine @ UoM

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #36 on: December 19, 2011, 09:30:49 am »
0
IRC channel turnout in this thread.

You can do exchange in biomed, just in limited semesters. Biomed is also much better for socializing and meeting people because it's a core subject based course, whereas the thousand people in science are off doing half a dozen pathways and stuff. In biomed you'll have the same lectures with the same people always.

Few will choose Science over Biomedicine (those who are contemplating PG health sciences),  the latter confers no advantage in admission to post graduate courses which is why its puzzling. Pride goeth before the fall eh? Although many seem to cope well in general (not some I know). Im not sure what to say about that last point of yours.

It's not puzzling at all, people choose biomedicine because it's a better course for those who are interested in the health sciences. Also because prestige, but the first part is still true.

Interested in health sciences so much so that they would choose a course which can potentially damage their chances to enter an actual health science course not just one where some lame applications of theory are thrown together to make it seem so much more appealing along with 'medicine' in the title?

EDIT:I'm certainly not complaining though, just an observation..

Don't be naive.

Quote
I've heard that the BBiomed fees are higher than BSc. Not sure if this is true though.

Only for some subjects. The difference is negligible when you compare it to the total fees paid.

Quote
Biomed obviously doesn't ruin anyones chances at getting into PG health science courses. I haven't done it myself but perhaps Russ can confirm that it covers much more biomedical sciences compared to a normal Science course and covers a broad range of disciplines and issues in the healthcare profession - probably gives a much better stepping stone to MD. If I could go back I would have done biomed instead. The BSc is a very broad degree and wasn't able to cover other topics such as Pharmacology and Pathology.

Yeah pretty much, it very definitely supports the melbourne model idea of "know something about everything and everything about something".

Quote
By the same token, this is a 3rd year BBioMed friend who said this to me, and it's influenced me to riddle that I'd do better in a BBioMed course.

I have a BBiomed degree and in third year you will spend more time in the presence of science students than just biomed students. That's not to say there won't be pressure on you, but I never found myself to be competing against other students in 3rd year for marks in our core subjects. There is a general sense of competition all throughout the degree, but it's never particularly cutthroat or overt.

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #37 on: December 19, 2011, 10:31:32 am »
+1
PS: JUST CURIOUS NOW, but why am I a hipster!!!
Probably because your sig has arts in it and the science bar is so small that no one can read it without actually clicking on it... So they probably thought you were in arts ---->  generalisation that they're all hipsters :P

Just for the record VivaTequila that is no manner in which to address someone on these forums, especially someone as revered as Mavis. I would expect much more from someone intending to become a doctor, so please think more carefully before you call people "hipster pricks". In regards to your decision it's clear to me that you're set on biomed, so just do that. Quick question though, do you have any SEAS/Access melbourne considerations?
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


simpak

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3587
  • Respect: +376
Re: Biomed or Science?
« Reply #38 on: December 19, 2011, 10:43:49 am »
+3
I <3 you guyz.
2009 ENTER: 99.05
2014: BSci Hons (Microbiology/Immunology) at UoM
2015+: PhD (Immunology) at UoM