National Education > General National Education Discussion
Teacher quality vs Studying
acinod:
--- Quote from: dc302 on December 21, 2011, 10:58:57 pm ---How many ANers actually learned the course from their teachers? The only subjects I actually 'used' the teacher for were english and chemistry...
--- End quote ---
Now that you mention it...actually never learnt anything from my teachers...
And physics department is horrible at MHS except for two teachers and we they are obvious if you go to MHS. These 2 teachers are amazing.
aes_999:
Definitely learned BM from Mr. M
His exam tips are the bomb.
Liuy:
--- Quote from: Tobias Funke on December 21, 2011, 10:24:34 pm ---Every school has shit teachers, but you can't put any blame on that.
If you want to attribute it to something, compare MHS and MacRobs Humanities - Legal Studies for example, they just wiped the floor, and our Legal Studies teachers aren't even bad.
--- End quote ---
For sure.
Maybe girls are really better at Humanities and boys more suited to maths/science (generalising)
Also, MHS had a cohort of ~360 this year, much larger than usual. Could explain the below average ranking.
BoredSatan:
--- Quote from: dc302 on December 21, 2011, 10:58:57 pm ---How many ANers actually learned the course from their teachers? The only subjects I actually 'used' the teacher for were english and chemistry...
--- End quote ---
GWSC Accounting teachers are the best :D
pi:
--- Quote from: Bazza16 on December 21, 2011, 06:47:07 pm ---melbourne high has pretty bad teachers too, though some faculties are better than others, but atm chem and physics are pretty deplorable
--- End quote ---
Chem is alright, physics is crap
--- Quote from: dc302 on December 21, 2011, 10:58:57 pm ---How many ANers actually learned the course from their teachers? The only subjects I actually 'used' the teacher for were english and chemistry...
--- End quote ---
I did for chem, spesh and methods
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version