Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:10:36 pm

Author Topic: Systematic Errors in Volumetric Titration  (Read 18458 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chimpy400

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • Respect: +30
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Systematic Errors in Volumetric Titration
« on: March 01, 2012, 09:09:32 pm »
0
We're conducting a practical tommorow on the ammonium concentration in lawn fertiliser through back titration.

It is a common question throughout our SACs to ask about Systematic Errors in Volumetric titration and I am lacking ideas. (apparently equipment can't be used, e.g. calibration error.)

ty
2013 - BBus Monash
2014 - BCom Melb

Somye

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 296
  • Respect: +43
  • School: Melbourne High
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Systematic Errors in Volumetric Titration
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2012, 09:31:28 pm »
0
I'm not sure if this is a systematic error, but you could talk about errors which arise if you use wrong methods of cleaning the apparatus

ie. if burette not washed properly then conc. decreases. hence more vol needed hence leads to higher calculated values

or if pipette not cleaned properly than lower mol of ammonium and then lower solution required to neutralise and therefore lower calculated values
2011: Accounting, Latin
2012: Methods, Chem, Specialist, English, Business Management
ATAR: 99.85

Tutoring Chemistry, Accounting and Specialist Maths in 2013, PM if interested

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: Systematic Errors in Volumetric Titration
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2012, 10:50:10 pm »
0
You could possibly talk about your primary standard reacting with the atmosphere if it's an effluent substance (meaning that it absorbs moisture from the atmosphere, like sodium carbonate), which will mean that your weighed mass of the primary standard will be incorrect every time you conduct the experiment, and hence the concentration of your standard solution will be inaccurate.
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne