Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 08:04:22 pm

Author Topic: HORRIBLE first sac score :(  (Read 1936 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

luke_rulz94

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Respect: -1
  • School: St Paul's
HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« on: April 16, 2012, 05:53:53 pm »
0
Got my first Spesh sac back today,
was around 50-60% :(
the highest in the class was 75%
Various reasons such as a horrible teacher who lectures all day and my own poor effort due to lack of motivation ( mainly the latter I feel ) were the reason for this.
Can I still get a high 30/low 40's study score?

Bhootnike

  • Chief Curry Officer
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1332
  • Biggest Sharabi
  • Respect: +75
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2012, 05:56:02 pm »
0
that isn't as bad as you think man!
if 75 was the highest, and you got b/w 50 and 60, it seems as if you're still ranked well!
just try to get higher in the next one and im sure you'll be right :)
2011: Biol - 42
2012: Spesh |Methods |Chemistry |English Language| Physics
2014: Physiotherapy
khuda ne jab tujhe banaya hoga, ek suroor uske dil mein aaya hoga, socha hoga kya doonga tohfe mein tujhe.... tab ja ke usne mujhe banaya hoga

nisha

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1247
  • Hum Honge Kamyab.
  • Respect: +117
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2012, 07:04:55 pm »
0
Exact same situation. I just passed, Literally got 50%, and the highest was 74% in our class.
But that was the Calc sac, in non calc, I received a 75% and the highest was 98%.

It all depends on your ranking, not the individual score. And dont worry, I've heard Spesh is going to scale up by 15 this year:)
Melbourne University-Science-Second year

Am taking in students for CHEMISTRY and MATHS METHODS tuition for 2014 as well as first year chemistry. If interested, pm me. Flexible with location.

"Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught [/i]

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 11:47:16 pm »
+1
And dont worry, I've heard Spesh is going to scale up by 15 this year:)
WHAT!?

Surely not...

Most likely ~11-12, I would think.

(Although, this is still massive IMO)
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Hutchoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2356
  • Mate.
  • Respect: +218
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2012, 12:50:11 am »
+5

And dont worry, I've heard Spesh is going to scale up by 15 this year:)

I also heard that Santa Claus is real :3

Special At Specialist

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1542
  • Respect: +86
  • School: Flinders Christian Community College (Tyabb)
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2012, 01:58:23 pm »
0
My class was like the opposite. We had a super easy SAC (easier than most further maths SAC's) and everyone in the class got either 100% or very close to it. That means there is no variation and the good students will end up with a C+ SAC average :(
2012 ATAR - 86.75
2013 ATAR - 88.50
2014: BSci (Statistics) at RMIT
2015 - 2017: BCom at UoM

Sam_95

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Respect: 0
Re: HORRIBLE first sac score :(
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2012, 11:32:43 am »
0
Same here I got absolutly romped in my first SAC. Got 19 out of 38 which is 50% on the dot. The highest in the class was 32 out of 38. Was shattered after because I know it was my lack of motivation that caused this. really need to bounce back strongly in the next SAC.