Hi,
I recently received the results of my first Politics assessment. It was a 500 word research essay in which we had to argue against an opinion-editorial piece. I received a grade of H2A (+), the + signifying that I was 1 or 2% off an H1, however my essay evaluation seems sub-par for the standard of an H2A/H1 essay.
I got a (all evaluations are out of 6 with 1 being the best) 2, 2 (excellent) for research, 5 (needs work), 4, 4 (good), for presentation and organisation which includes writing style and expression, comprehensive bibliography and grammar spelling and finally a 2, 2, 2 for content and argument. Is it just that university standards are extremely high where anything over 3 is very good or did my tutor just give me an H2A out of pity?
Don't get me wrong, I am EXTREMELY happy with this result, I'm just a little self-concious of receiving a grade that I shouldn't have received.
Also, I'm under the impression that everyone receives a decent grade for their first assessment, can anyone shed some light on this? Having received 2 H1s and an H2A while only achieving an ATAR score of 81, you can probably see why I'm skeptical of these grades.
Thank you! Sorry for the stupid questions. Just can't seem to get these thoughts out of my mind.