Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 21, 2025, 06:45:34 pm

Author Topic: Calibration Curve  (Read 1080 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rayray17

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Respect: 0
Calibration Curve
« on: June 07, 2012, 12:38:08 pm »
0
Hi,
This may seem like a stupid question but when creating a calibration curve for Chromo or Spectrometry, if they dont give the point's (100,230) (200,540) (300,820) should i start my graph from the origin (0,0)

Thanks,
Ray

Somye

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 296
  • Respect: +43
  • School: Melbourne High
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2012, 01:29:53 pm »
0
I wouldn't, because I don't technically think you're allowed to extrapolate graphs, (otherwise why would you have to make a soln fit within the bounds of the curve)

That said, someone else may be able to offer a better insight
2011: Accounting, Latin
2012: Methods, Chem, Specialist, English, Business Management
ATAR: 99.85

Tutoring Chemistry, Accounting and Specialist Maths in 2013, PM if interested

Truck

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 870
  • Respect: +122
  • School: who needs school when you got SWAG?
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2012, 01:54:54 pm »
0
Never extrapolate anything, so always plot the graph between the points you're given. Also remember, a solution with 0 concentration of the substance your analysing (i.e.) a solvent may still read some absorbance, so you might be incorrect starting it at (0,0).
#yolo #thuglife #swaggotandproud

Inspirations: Mahtama Ghandi, T-Pain, The Caped Crusader and Ayn Rand.

Tonychet2

  • Guest
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2012, 02:02:53 pm »
0
correct me if im wrong but, you ARE allowed to extrapolate points before your given points, but not after so e.g

if your given between 100 - 500 u can extrapolate to 0 but not > 500


edit: nvm im sure this is pretty wrong
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 04:55:52 pm by Tonychet2 »

amilss

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Respect: +7
  • School: St Peters College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2012, 04:41:42 pm »
0
Feel free to correct ME if im wrong, but my teacher told us we can't extrapolate below our lowest point, but we can continue it above our highest point

Im not sure either way:/ so im just gunna confine any calibration graphs to the points given
2011 - Psychology [42]
2012 atar aim - 99+. There,i said it, it's offical, now i have to reach it!

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
  • Respect: +410
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2012, 04:44:12 pm »
0
I'm pretty sure you can't extrapolate past the points you've been given, whether it be above or below
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: Calibration Curve
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2012, 04:53:20 pm »
0
Last year my teacher, an assessor, deducted marks on a SAC for extrapolating graphs below the lowest given point (down to 0). I can't recall about going above though, sorry. I probably wouldn't go above either, though.
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup